Colony size affects division of labour in the ponerine ant Rhytidoponera metallica

Naturwissenschaften

Volumn 90, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 88-92

  Thomas, Melissa L ^a,b   Elgar, Mark A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANT; COLONY STRUCTURE; LABOR DIVISION; SOCIAL ORGANIZATION;

AGE; ANT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FORAGING; NONHUMAN; ORGANISM COLONY; TASK PERFORMANCE; WORK; WORK CAPACITY;

FORMICIDAE; HEXAPODA; HYMENOPTERA; RHYTIDOPONERA; RHYTIDOPONERA METALLICA;

EID: 0037291131     PISSN: 00281042     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00114-002-0396-x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Anderson C, McShea DW (2001) Individual versus social complexity, with particular reference to ant colonies. Biol Rev 76:211-237
2. Anderson C, Ratnieks FLW (1999) Task partitioning in insect societies. I. Effect of colony size on queueing delay and colony ergonomic efficiency. Am Nat 154:521-535
3. Beshers SN, Fewell JH (2001) Models of division of labor in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 46:413-440
4. Bonavita-Cougourdan A, Clément JL, Lange C (1993) Functional subcaste discrimination (foragers and brood-tenders) in the ant Camponotus vagus Scop.: polymorphism of cuticular hydrocarbon patterns. J Chem Ecol 7:1461-1477
5. Bourke AFG (1999) Colony size, social complexity and reproductive conflict in social insects. J Evol Biol 12:245-257
6. Bourke AFG, Franks NR (1995) Social evolution in ants. Princeton University Press, Princeton
7. Calabi P, Rosengaus R (1988) Interindividual differences based on behaviour transition probabilities in the ant Camponotus sericeiventris. In: Jeanne RL (ed) Interindividual behavioural variability in social insects. Westview, Boulder, Colo.
8. Corbara B, Lachaud J-P, Fresneau D (1989) Individual variability, social structure and division of labour in the ponerine ant Ectatomma ruidum Roger (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Ethology 82:89-100
9. Dejean A, J-P Lachaud (1991) Polyethism in the ponerine ant Odontomachus troglodytes: interaction of age and interindividual variability. Sociobiology 18:177-196
10. Franks NR, Tofts C (1994) Foraging for work: how tasks allocate workers. Anim Behav 48:470-472
11. Gautrais J, Theraulaz G, Deneubourg J-L, Anderson C (2002) Emergent polyethism as a consequence of increased colony size in insect societies. J Theor Biol 215:363-373
12. Gordon DM, Kulig AW (1996) Founding, foraging, and fighting: colony size and the spatial distribution of harvester ant nests. Ecology 77:2393-2409
13. Gordon DM, Mehdiabadi NJ (1999) Encounter rate and task allocation in harvester ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 45:370-377
14. Gordon DM, Goodwin BC, Trainor LEH (1992) A parallel distributed model of the behaviour of ant colonies. J Theor Biol 156:293-307
15. Gordon DM, Paul RE, Thorpe K (1993) What is the function of encounter patterns in ant colonies? Anim Behav 45:1083-1100
16. Haskins PC, Haskins EF (1979) Worker compatibilities within and between populations of Rhytidoponera metallica. Psyche 86:299-312
17. Huang SY, Robinson GE (1992) Honeybee colony integration: worker - worker interactions mediate hormonally regulated plasticity in division of labor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89:11726-11729
18. Jaisson R, Fresneau D, Lachaud J-P (1988) Individual traits of social behaviour in ants. In: Jeanne RL (ed) Interindividual behavioural variability in social insects. Westview, Boulder, Colo., pp 1-51
19. Jeanne RL (1986) The organization of work in Polybia occidentalis: costs and benefits of specialisation in a social wasp. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 19:333-341
20. Jeanne RL (1987) Do water foragers pace nest construction activity in Polybia occidentalis? In: Detrain C, Pasteels JM, Deneubourg JL (eds) From individual to collective behaviour in social insects. Birkhäuser, Basel
21. Jeanne RL (1991) The swarm-founding Polistinae. In: Ross KG, Matthes RW (eds) The social biology of wasps, pp 191-231. Comstock, Ithaca, N.Y.
22. Jeanne RL (1999) Group size, productivity, and information flow in social wasps. In: Detrain CD, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM (eds) Information processing in social insects. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 3-30
23. Karsai I, Wenzel JW (1998) Productivity, individual-level and colony-level flexibility, and organization of work as consequences of colony size. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:8665-8669
24. Kaspari M, Vargo EL (1995) Colony size as a buffer against seasonality: Bergmann's rule in social insects. Am Nat 145:610-632
25. Lenoir A (1987) Factors determining polyethism in social insects. Experientia 54:219-241
26. McCune B, Mefford MJ (1999) PC-ORD: multivariate analysis of ecological data, version 4.10. MjM Software, Glenedon Beach, Ore.
27. Nonacs P, Dill LM (1990) Mortality risk versus food quality trade-offs in a common currency: ant patch preferences. Ecology 71:886-892
28. Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.
29. Pacala SW, Gordon DM, Godfray HCJ (1996) Effects of social group size on information transfer and task allocation. Evol Ecol 10:127-165
30. Peeters C (1997) Morphologically 'primitive' ants: comparative review of social characters, and the importance of queen-worker dimorphism. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of social behaviour in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 372-391
31. Pereira HM, Gordon DM (2001) A trade-off in task allocation between sensitivity to the environment and response time. J Theor Biol 208:165-184
32. Pielou EC (1969) An introduction to mathematical ecology. Wiley, New York
33. Ratnieks FLW, Anderson C (1999) Task partitioning in insect societies. Insectes Soc 46:95-108
34. Robinson GE (1992) Regulation of division of labor in insect societies. Annu Rev Entomol 37:637-702
35. Robinson GE, Page RE, Huang Z-Y (1994) Temporal polyethism in social insects is a developmental process. Anim Behav 48:467-469
36. Schmid-Hempel P, Winston ML, Ydenberg RC (1993) Foraging of individual workers in relation to colony state in social Hymenoptera. Can Entomol 125:129-160
37. Seeley TD (1989) Social foraging in honey bees: how nectar foragers assess their colony's nutritional status. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 24:181-199
38. Sendova-Franks A, Franks NR (1993) Task allocation in ant colonies within variable environments. (A study of temporal polyethism: experimental). Bull Math Biol 55:75-96
39. Sendova-Franks A, Franks NR (1994) Social resilience in individual worker ants and its role in division of labour. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 256:305-309
40. Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Ill.
41. Thomas ML (2002) Causes and consequences of colony size in the ponerine ant Rhytidoponera metallica. PhD thesis, University of Melbourne, Australia
42. Tofts C (1993) Algorithms for task allocation in ants. (A study of temporal polyethism: theory). Bull Math Biol 55:891-918
43. Tofts C, Franks NR (1992) Doing the right thing: ants, honeybees and naked mole-rats. Trends Ecol Evol 7:346-349
44. Traniello JFA (1978) Caste in a primitive ant: absence of age polyethism in Amblyopone. Science 202:770-772
45. Tschinkel WR (1988) Colony growth and the ontogeny of worker polymorphism in the fire ant, Solenopsis invicta. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:103-115
46. Ward PS (1986) Functional queens in the Australian greenhead ant, Rhytidoponera metallica (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Psyche 93:1-12
47. Wenzel JW, Pickering J (1991) Cooperative foraging, productivity, and the central limit theorem. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88:36-38
48. Wilkinson L (1997) SYSTAT 7.0.1 for Windows. SPSS, Chicago
49. Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
50. Wilson EO (1976) Behavioral discretization and the number of castes in an ant species. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1:141-154
51. Wilson EO (1985) The principles of caste evolution. In: Hölldobler B, Lindauer M (eds) Experimental behavioral ecology and sociobiology. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, pp 307-324
52. Wilson EO (1990) Success and dominance in ecosystems: the case of the social insects. Ecology Institute, Oldendorf/Luhe, Germany