Text classification based on data partitioning and parameter varying ensembles

Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Computing

Volumn 2, Issue , 2005, Pages 1044-1048

  Dong, Yan Shi ^a   Han, Ke Song ^b  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b MOTOROLA INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Ensemble; Support vector machines; Text classification

Indexed keywords

HETEROGENEOUS ENSEMBLES; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES (SVM); TEXT CLASSIFICATION;

DATA REDUCTION; VECTORS;

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

EID: 33644498840     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1066677.1066916     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Ali, K. M., and Pazzani, M. J. Error reduction through learning multiple descriptions. Machine Learning, 24(3):173-202, 1996.
2. Brank, J., Grobelnik, M., Milic-Frayling, N., and Mladenic, D. Interaction of feature selection methods and linear classification models. In Proceedings of the ICML-02 Workshop on Text Learning, Sydney, AU, 2002.
3. Breiman, L. Bagging predictors. Machine Learning 24(2):123-140, 1996.
4. th intl. Conf. on knowledge discovery and data mining, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, 164-168, 1998.
5. Chang, Y. I. Boosting SVM classifiers with logistic regression. See www.stat.sinica.edu.tw/library/c_tec_rep/2003-03.pdf, 2003.
6. Chawla, N. V., Lazarevic, A., Hall, L, O., and Bowyer, K. W. SMOTEBoost: Improving prediction of the minority class in boosting. In 7th European Conference on Principles and Practice of Knowledge Discovery in Databases, Springer, Berlin, New York, 107-119, 2003.
7. st Intl. Workshop on Multiple Classifier Systems, 1-15, Springer Verlag, New York, NY, USA, 2000.
8. Dumais, S., Platt, J., Heckerman, D., and Sahami, M. Inductive learning algorithms and representations for text categorization. In Proc. 7th Intl. Conf. on Information and knowledge management, ACM Press New York, NY, USA, 148-155, 1998.
9. th ICML, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, USA, 325-332, 1996.
10. Joachims, T. Learning to Classify Text Using Support Vector Machines: Methods, Theory and Algorithms, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA, USA, 2002.
11. Kolcz, A., and Alspector, J. SVM-based filtering of E-mail spam with content-specific misclassification costs. In Proc. ICDM-2001 Workshop on Text Mining, 2001.
12. th ICML, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, USA, 179-186, 1997.
13. th ICML. 331-339, 1995.
14. rd Annual Symp. on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval, 81-93, 1994.
15. Lewis, D. D., Yang, Y., Rose, T. G., and Li, Fan. RCV1: A new benchmark collection for text categorization research. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2004(5):361-397, 2004.
16. McCallum, A. and Nigam, K. A comparison of event models for naïve Bayes text classification, In Proc. of AAAI-98 Workshop on Learning for Text Categorization, AAAI Press, 41-48, 1998.
17. Mladenic, D., and Grobelnik, M. Feature selection for unbalanced class distribution and naïve Bayes. In Proc. 16th ICML, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, USA, 1999.
18. th ACM SIGIR, 67-73, ACM Press, New York, NY, 1997.
19. Salton, G., and Buchley, C. Term-weighting approaches in automatic text retrieval. Information Processing & Management, 24(5):513-523, 1988.
20. Steinbach, M., Karypis, G., and Kumar, V. A comparison of document clustering techniques. In Text Mining Workshop of the 6th ACM SIGKDD Intl. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2000.
21. Weiss, G. M., and Provost, F. The effect of class distribution on classifier learning: An empirical study. Technical Report ML-TR-44, Dept. of Computer Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, 2001.
22. Wiener, E., Pedersen, L O., and Weigend, A. S. A neural network approach to topic sporting. In Proc. of the Symp. on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval, 317-332, 1995.