Response of the auditory nerve to sinusoidal electrical stimulation: Effects of high-rate pulse trains

Hearing Research

Volumn 194, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 1-13

  Runge Samuelson, Christina L ^a,d   Abbas, Paul J ^a,b   Rubinstein, Jay T ^b,c   Miller, Charles A ^a,b   Robinson, Barbara K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF IOWA HOSPITALS AND CLINICS   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^d MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

Author keywords

A, microamperes; D A, digital to analog; DC, direct current; ECAP, electrically evoked compound action potential; FFT, fast Fourier transform; mA, milliamperes; mV, millivolt; Pt Ir, platinum iridium; RMS, root mean square; RS, relative spread

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC NERVE FIBER; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CAT; COCHLEAR NERVE; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; GUINEA PIG; HEARING; HEARING AID; NERVE POTENTIAL; NERVE STIMULATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CATS; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; COCHLEAR NERVE; DEAFNESS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; GUINEA PIGS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 3342996932     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.03.020     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Abbas, P.J., Miller, C.A., Rubinstein, J.T., Abkes, B.A., Runge-Samuelson, C.L., Robinson, B.K., 2000. Effects of Remaining Hair Cells on Cochlear Implant Function. Third Quarterly Progress Report N01-DC-9-2106
2. Brown C.B., Abbas P.J. Electrically evoked whole nerve action potentials: Parametric data from the cat. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88(5):1990;2205-2210
3. Chatterjee M., Robert M.E. Noise enhances modulation sensitivity in cochlear implant listeners: stochastic resonance in a prosthetic sensory system? J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2(2):2001;159-171
4. Chi, S.-L. 2001. Correlating Loudness and EAP Measures. Doctoral dissertation, Department of Speech Pathology and Audiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA
5. Dynes, S.B.C. 1996. Discharge Characteristics of Auditory Nerve Fibers for Pulsatile Electrical Stimuli. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
6. Hartmann R., Klinke R. Spatial and temporal resolution in multichannel cochlear impants. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 104(Suppl. 166):1995;113-115
7. Hartmann R., Topp G., Klinke R. Discharge patterns of cat primary auditory fibers with electrical stimulation of the cochlea. Hear. Res. 13:1984;47-62
8. Hartmann R., Pennigdorf T., Klinke R. Evoked potentials from the auditory nerve following sinusoidal electical stimulation of the cochlea: New possibilities for preoperative testing in cochlear-implant candidates? Acta Otolaryngol. (Stockh.). 114:1994;495-500
9. Hong R., S, Rubinstein J.T., Wehner D., Horn D. Dynamic range enhancement for cochlear implants. Otol. Neurotol. 24(4):2003;590-595
10. Kiang N.Y.S., Watanabe T., Thomas E.C., Clark L.F. Discharge Patterns of Single Fibers in the Cat's Auditory Nerve, Research monographs 35. 1965;MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
11. Litvak L., Delgutte B., Eddington D.K. Auditory nerve fiber responses to electrical stimulation: Modulated and unmodulated pulse trains. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 110(1):2001;368-379
12. Litvak, L., Smith, Z., Delgutte, B., Eddington, D.K., 2001b. Using high-rate pulse trains to improve the neural representation of stimulus fine structure: single unit recordings. In: 2001 Conf. Implant. Audit. Prosthes., Pacific Grove, CA
13. Matsuoka A.J., Abbas P.J., Rubinstein J.T., Miller C.A. The neuronal response to electrical constant-amplitude pulse train stimulation: evoked compound action potential recordings. Hear. Res. 149:2000;115-128
14. Matsuoka A.J., Abbas P.J., Rubinstein J.T., Miller C.A. The neuronal response to electrical constant-amplitude pulse train stimulation: additive Gaussian noise. Hear. Res. 149:2000;129-137
15. Matsuoka A.J., Rubinstein J.T., Abbas P.J., Miller C.A. The effects of interpulse interval on stochastic properties of electrical stimulation: models and measurements. IEEE Trans. Bio. Eng. 48(4):2001;416-424
16. Miller C.A., Abbas P.J., Rubinstein J.T., Robinson B.K., Matsuoka A.J., Woodworth G. Electrically evoked compound action potentials of guinea pig and cat: responses to monopolar, monophasic stimulation. Hear. Res. 119:1998;142-154
17. Miller C.A., Abbas P.J., Rubinstein J.T. An empirically based model of the electrically evoked compound action potential. Hear. Res. 135:1999;1-18
18. Miller C.A., Abbas P.J., Robinson B.K. Response properties of the refractory auditory nerve fiber. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2:2001;216-232
19. Morse R.P., Evans E.F. Enhancement of vowel coding for cochlear implants by addition of noise. Nat. Med. 2(8):1996;928-932
20. Parnas B.R. Noise and neuronal populations conspire to encode simple waveforms reliably. IEEE Tans. Biomed. Eng. 43(3):1996;313-318
21. Rubinstein J.T., Hong R.S. Signal coding in cochlear implants: exploiting stochastic effects of electrical stimulation. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 112(Suppl. 191):2003;14-19
22. Rubinstein J.T., Wilson B.S., Finley C.C., Abbas P.J. Pseudospontaneous activity: stochastic independence of auditory nerve fibers with electrical stimulation. Hear. Res. 127:1999;108-118
23. Rubinstein, J.T., Abbas, P.J., Miller, C.A., 2000. The Effects of Remaining Hair Cells on Cochlear Implant Function. Second Quarterly Progress Report N01-DC-2106
24. Shepherd R.K., Javel E. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status. Hear. Res. 108:1997;112-144
25. van den Honert C., Stypulkowski P.H. Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. II. Single fiber recordings. Hear. Res. 14:1984;225-243
26. van den Honert C., Stypulkowski P.H. Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. Hear. Res. 29:1987;195-206
27. Verveen A.A. Fluctuation in Excitability. 1961;Drukkerij Holland, Amsterdam
28. West B.A., Brummett R.E., Himes D.L. Interaction of kanamycin and ethacrynic acid. Arch. Otolaryngol. 98:1973;32-37
29. Wilson, B.S., Zebri, M., Lawson, D.T., van den Honert, C., 1997. Speech Processors for Auditory Prostheses. Seventh Quarterly Progress Report N01-DC-5-2103
30. Xu S.A., Shepherd R.K., Chen Y., Clark G.M. Profound hearing loss in the cat following the single co-administration of kanamycin and ethacrynic acid. Hear. Res. 70:1993;205-215