Advantages and potential dangers of presentation before publication: Third in a series on editorship

Archives of Ophthalmology

Volumn 122, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 1045-1048

  Bressler, Neil M ^a   Liesegang, Thomas J ^b   Schachat, Andrew P ^a   Albert, Daniel M ^c  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OPHTHALMOLOGY; PEER REVIEW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; REVIEW; ARTICLE; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; METHODOLOGY; ORGANIZATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CONGRESSES; GUIDELINES; HUMANS; OPHTHALMOLOGY; PEER REVIEW; PERIODICALS; PUBLICATIONS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;

EID: 3342986669     PISSN: 00039950     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.122.7.1045     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Rochon PA, Bero LA, May AM, et al. Comparison of review articles published in peer-reviewed and throwaway journals. JAMA. 2002;287:2853-2856.
2. Angell M, Kassirer JP. The Ingelfinger Rule revisited. N Engl J Med. 1991;325:1371-1373.
3. Woloshin S, Schwartz LM. Press releases: translating research into news. JAMA. 2002;287:2856-2858.
4. National Emphysema Treatment Trial Research Group. Patients at high risk of death after lung-volume-reduction surgery. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1075-1083.
5. Johannes L. Study casts doubt on surgery used against emphysema. Wall Street Journal. August 15, 2001:1.
6. Schwartz LM, Woloshin S, Baczek L. Media coverage of scientific meetings: too much, too soon? JAMA. 2002;287:2859-2863.
7. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D, for the CONSORT Group. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA. 2001;285:1987-1991.
8. Ingelfinger FJ. Shattuck lecture: the general medical journal: for readers or repositories? N Engl J Med. 1977;296:1258-1264.
9. Altman LK. The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review: part 1. Lancet. 1996;347:1382-1386.
10. Altman LK. The Ingelfinger rule, embargoes, and journal peer review: part 2. Lancet. 1996;347:1459-1463.
11. Lichter PR. Duplicate publication and copyright: the role of authors and reviewers. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:1601-1602.