Isoflurane increases amplitude and incidence of evoked and spontaneous otoacoustic emissions

Hearing Research

Volumn 194, Issue 1-2, 2004, Pages 135-142

  Drexl, Markus ^a,c   Henke, Julia ^b   Kössl, Manfred ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b Lehrst F Experimentelle O   (Germany)

^c GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

ACh, acetylcholine; CF2, constant frequency part of the second harmonic of the echolocation call; CLN, contralateral noise; CRF, cochlear resonance frequency; DPOAE, distortion product otoacoustic emission; MEM, middle ear muscles

Indexed keywords

ACETYLCHOLINE; INHALATION ANESTHETIC AGENT; ISOFLURANE;

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BAT; COCHLEA POTENTIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; HAIR CELL; INCIDENCE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; NONHUMAN; POSTSYNAPTIC POTENTIAL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPONTANEOUS OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VAPORIZER;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANESTHETICS, INHALATION; ANIMALS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CHIROPTERA; COCHLEA; EFFERENT PATHWAYS; FEMALE; ISOFLURANE; MALE; MODELS, ANIMAL; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS;

EID: 3342917523     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2004.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Albera R., Ferrero V., Canale A., Siena L.D., Pallavicino F., Poli L. Cochlear blood flow modifications induced by anaesthetic drugs in middle ear surgery: Comparison between sevoflurance and propofol. Acta Oto-Laryngol. 123(7):2003;812-816
2. Albera R., Tondolo E., Ferrero V.P.P., Pallavicino F. The evaluation of isoflurane's effect on the cochlear blood flow by laser doppler flowmetry. Acta Otorhinolaryngol. Ital. 15(4):1995;289-293. (article in Italian)
3. Bissinger U., Plinkert P.K., Sesterhenn G., Grimm A., Lenz G. Influence of volatile and intravenous anesthetics on the threshold of the acoustically evoked stapedius reflex. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 257(7):2000;349-354
4. Boege P., Janssen T. Pure-tone threshold estimation from extrapolated distortion product otoacoustic emission. i/o -functions in normal and cochlear hearing loss ears J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111(4):2002;1810-1818
5. Boyev K.P., Liberman M.C., Brown M.C. Effects of anesthesia on efferent-mediated adaptation of the DPOAE. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 3(3):2002;362-373
6. Brown A.M. Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: a comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs and gerbils. Hear. Res. 31(1):1987;25-37
7. Brown J.N., Nuttall A.L. Autoregulation of cochlear blood flow in guinea pigs. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 266(2):1994;H458-H467
8. Bufler J., Pichlmeier R., Schneck H.J., Hussman H., Franke C. Block of nicotinic acetylcholine-activated channels of cultured mouse myotubes by isoflurane. Neurosci. Lett. 168(1-2):1994;135-138
9. Camalet S., Duke T., Julicher F., Prost J. Auditory sensitivity provided by self-tuned critical oscillations of hair cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97(7):2000;3183-3188
10. Cazals Y. Auditory sensori-neural alterations induced by salicylate. Progr. Neurobiol. 62(6):2000;583-631
11. Clark W.W., Kim D.O., Zurek P.M., Bohne B.A. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in chinchilla ear canals: correlation with histopathology and suppression by external tones. Hear. Res. 16(3):1984;299-314
12. Coro F., Kössl M. Distortion- product otoacoustic emissions from the tympanic organ in two noctuoid moths. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 183:1998;525-531
13. Davis H. An active process in cochlear mechanics. Hear. Res. 9(1):1983;79-90
14. Dilger J.P., Brett R.S., Lesko L.A. Effects of isoflurane on acetycholine receptor channels: 1. Single-channel currents. Mol. Pharmacol. 41:1991;127-133
15. Dilger J.P., Brett R.S., Mody H.I. The effects of isoflurane on acethylcholine channels: 2. Currents elicited by rapid perfusion of acetycholine. Mol. Pharmacol. 44:1993;1056-1063
16. Drexl M., Kössl M. Sound-evoked efferent effects on cochlear mechanics of the mustached bat. Hear. Res. 184(1-2):2003;61-74
17. Elgoyhen A.B., Vetter D.E., Katz E., Rothlin C.V., Heinemann S.F., Boulter J. Alpha 10: a determinant of nicotinic cholinergic receptor function in mammalian vestibular and cochlear mechanosensory hair cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98(6):2001;3501-3506
18. Faulstich M., Kössl M. Evidence for multiple dpoae components based upon group delay of the. 2f(1)-f(2) distortion in the gerbil Hear. Res. 140(1-2):2000;99-110
19. Faulstich M., Kössl M., Reimer K. Analysis of non-linear cochlear mechanics in the marsupial monodelphis domestica: ancestral and modern mammalian features. Hear. Res. 94(1-2):1996;47-53
20. Foeller E., Kössl M. Mechanical adaptations for echolocation in the cochlea of the bat Hipposideros lankadiva. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 186(9):2000;859-870
21. Fukazawa T., Tanaka Y. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in an active feed-forward model of the cochlea. Hear. Res. 95(1-2):1996;135-143
22. Geisler C.D. A cochlear model using feedback from motile outer hair cells. Hear. Res. 54(1):1991;105-117
23. Geisler C.D. A realizable cochlear model using feedback from motile outer hair cells. Hear. Res. 68(2):1993;253-262
24. Goldberg R.L., Henson O.W. Changes in cochlear mechanics during vocalization: evidence for a phasic medial efferent effect. Hear. Res. 122(1-2):1998;71-81
25. Hatzopoulos S., Petruccelli J., Laurell G., Finesso M., Martini A. Evaluation of anesthesia effects in a rat animal model using otoacoustic emission protocols(l). Hear. Res. 170(1-2):2002;12-21
26. Henke J., Haberstroh J. Anästhesieausrüstung und Anästhesiearbeitsplatz. Erhardt W., Haberstroh J., Henke J. Anästhesie und Analgesie beim Klein-und Heimtier. 2004;Enke Verlag, Stuttgart
27. Henson O.W., Henson M.M. The tympanic membrane: highly developed smooth muscle arrays in the annulus fibrosus of mustached bats. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 1:2000;25-32
28. Henson O.W., Xie D.H., Keating A.W., Henson M.M. The effect of contralateral stimulation on cochlear resonance and damping in the mustached bat: the role of the medial efferent system. Hear. Res. 86(1-2):1995;111-124
29. Jensen N.F., Todd M.M., Kramer D.J., Leonard P.A., Warner D.S. A comparison of the vasodilating effects of halothane and isoflurane on the isolated rabbit basilar artery with and without intact endothelium. Anesthesiology. 76(4):1992;624-634
30. Kemp D.T. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64(5):1978;1386-1391
31. Kettembeil S., Manley G.A., Siegl E. Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and their anaesthesia sensitivity in the european starling and the chicken. Hear. Res. 86(1-2):1995;47-62
32. Köppl C. Otoacoustic emissions as an indicator for active cochlear mechanics: a primitive property of vertebrate auditory organs. Manley G.A., Klump G.M., Köppl C., Fastl H., Oeckinghaus H. Advances in Hearing Research. 1995;207-216 World Scientific, Singapore
33. Kössl M. High frequency distortion products from the ears of two bat species, Megaderma lyra and Carollia perspicillata. Hear. Res. 60(2):1992;156-164
34. Kössl M. Otoacoustic emissions from the cochlea of the 'constant frequency' bats, Pteronotus parnellii and Rhinolophus rouxi. Hear. Res. 72(1-192):1994;59-72
35. Kössl M., Mayer F., Frank G., Faulstich M., Russell I.J. Evolutionary adaptations of cochlear function in Jamaican mormoopid bats. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 185(3):1999;217-228
36. Kössl M., Vater M. Consequences of outer hair cell damage for otoacoustic emissions and audio- vocal feedback in the mustache bat. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 01:2000;300-314
37. Liberman M.C. Rapid assessment of sound-evoked olivocochlear feed- back: suppression of compound action potentials by contralateral sound. Hear. Res. 38(1-2):1989;47-56
38. Liberman M.C., Gao J., He D.Z., Wu X., Jia S., Zuo J. Prestin is required for electromotility of the outer hair cell and for the cochlear amplifier. Nature. 419(6904):2002;300-304
39. Lukashkin A.N., Lukashkina V.A., Russell I.J. One source for distortion product otoacoustic emissions generated by low- and high-level primaries. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 111(6):2002;2740-2748
40. Martin G.K., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Probst R., Coats A.C. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a nonhuman primate. i. Basic features and relations to other emissions. Hear. Res. 33:1988;49-68
41. Martin P., Hudspeth A.J. Compressive nonlinearity in the hair bundle's active response to mechanical stimulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98(25):2001;14386-14391
42. McFadden D., Pasanen E.G. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in heterosexuals, homosexuals, and bisexuals. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105(4):1999;2403-2413
43. Morand N., Veuillet E., Gagnieu M.C., Lemoine P., Collet L. Ben-iszodiazepines alter cochleo-cochlear loop in humans. Hear. Res. 121(1-2):1998;71-76
44. Ohyama K., Wada H., Kobayashi T., Takasaka T. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in the guinea pig. Hear. Res. 56(1-2):1991;111-121
45. Ren T., Brown N.J., Zhang M., Nuttall A.L., Miller J.M. A reversible ischemia model in gerbil cochlea. Hear. Res. 92(1-2):1995;30-37
46. Russell I.J., Kössl M. Micromechanical responses to tones in the auditory fovea of the greater mustached bat's cochlea. J. Neurophysiol. 82(2):1999;676-686
47. Schloth E., Zwicker E. Mechanical and acoustical influences on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. Hear. Res. 11(3):1983;285-293
48. Shera C.A. Mammalian spontaneous otoacoustic emissions are amplitude-stabilized cochlear standing waves. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114(1):2003;244-262
49. Siegel J.H., Kim D.O. Efferent neural control of cochlear mechanics. olivocochlear bundle stimulation affects cochlear biomechanical nonlinearity. Hear. Res. 6(2):1982;171-182
50. Sill J.C., Eskuri S., Nelson R., Tarara J., Dyke R.A.V. The volatile anesthetic isoflurane attenuates Ca(2+) mobilization in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 265(1):1993;74-80
51. Talmadge C.L., Long G.R., Murphy W.J., Tubis A. New off-line method for detecting spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in human subjects. Hear. Res. 71(1-2):1993;170-182
52. Taschenberger G., Gallo L., Manley G.A. Filtering of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in the inner ear of birds and lizards. Hear. Res. 91(1-2):1995;87-92
53. van Dijk P., Mason M.J., Narins P.M. Distortion product otoacoustic isemissions in frogs: correlation with middle and inner ear properties. Hear. Res. 173(1-2):2002;100-108
54. van Dijk P., Narins P.M., Jianxin W. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in seven frog species. Hear. Res. 101(1-2):1996;102-112
55. Wittekindt, A., Drexl, M., Kössl, M., 2003. Cochlear sensitivity in the lesser spear-nosed bat, Phyllostomus discolor. In: Proceedings of the 29th Göttingen Neurobiology Conference, p. 427
56. Yang X., Henson O.W. Smooth muscle in the annulus fibrosus of the tympanic membrane: physiological effects on sound transmission in the gerbil. Hear. Res. 164(1-2):2002;105-114
57. Zheng Y., Ohyama K., Hozawa K., Wada H., Takasaka T. Effect of anesthetic agents and middle ear pressure application on distortion product otoacoustic emission in the gerbil. Hear. Res. 112(1-2):1997;167-174
58. Zwicker E. Otoacoustic emissions in a nonlinear cochlear hardware model with feedback. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 80(1):1986;154-162