Evidence for multiple DPOAE components based upon group delay of the 2f1-f2 distortion in the gerbil

Hearing Research

Volumn 140, Issue 1-2, 2000, Pages 99-110

  Faulstich, M ^a   Kossl M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cochlear amplifier; Cochlear non linearity; DPOAE; Otoacoustic emission

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; COCHLEA; DISTORTION PRODUCT OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; FEMALE; GERBIL; MALE; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR MICROPHONIC POTENTIALS; EVOKED POTENTIALS, AUDITORY; FEMALE; GERBILLINAE; MALE; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION;

EID: 0343339911     PISSN: 03785955     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0378-5955(99)00189-6     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Allen J.B., Fahey P.F. A second cochlear-frequency map that correlates distortion product and neural tuning measurements. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94:1993;809-816.
2. Brown A.M. Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: a comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs and gerbils. Hear. Res. 31:1987;25-37.
3. 2 stimulated acoustic emissions in gerbil and man. Hear. Res. 13:1984;29-37.
4. Brown A.M., Gaskill S.A. Measurement of acoustic distortion reveals underlying similarities between human and rodent mechanical responses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 88:1990;840-849.
5. Brown A.M., Gaskill S.A., Williams D.M. Mechanical filtering of sound in the inner ear. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 250:1992;29-34.
6. Brown A.M., Harris F.P., Beveridge H.A. Two sources of acoustic distortion products from the human cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100:1996;3260-3267.
7. Cooper N.P., Yates G.K. Nonlinear input-output functions derived from the responses of guinea-pig cochlear nerve fibres: variations with characteristic frequency. Hear. Res. 78:1994;221-234.
8. Faulstich M., Kössl M. Neuronal response to cochlear distortion products in the anterventral cochlear nucleus of the gerbil. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105:1999;491-502.
9. Faulstich M., Kössl M., Reimer K. Analysis of non-linear cochlear mechanics in the marsupial Monodelphis domestica: ancestral and modern mammalian features. Hear. Res. 94:1996;47-53.
10. 2 suppression tuning curves reflects basilar membrane specializations in the mustached bat, Pteronotus parnellii. Hear. Res. 83:1995;151-160.
11. 1 and their possible relation to changes in the operating point of the cochlear amplifier. Hear. Res. 98:1996;104-115.
12. 2. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100:1996;3268-3274.
13. 1 ratio. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 85:1989;220-229.
14. 2 removes DP-gram fine structure - Evidence for two generation sites DPOAE. Abstracts of the 22nd Midwinter Research Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, p. 83.
15. Kimberley B.P., Brown D.K., Eggermont J.J. Measuring human cochlear traveling wave delay using distortion product emission phase responses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94:1993;1343-1350.
16. Kössl M. High frequency distortion products from the ears of two bat species, Megaderma lyra and Carollia perspicillata. Hear. Res. 60:1992;156-164.
17. Kössl M., Frank G., Burda H., Müller M. Acoustic distortion products from the cochlea of the blind african mole rat, Cryptomys spec. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 178:1996;427-434.
18. 2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in humans. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98:1995;197-210.
19. Martin, G.K., 1999. Generation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions: Insights from suppression studies. Abstracts of the 24th Midwinter Research Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, p. 210.
20. Martin G.K., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Probst R., Scheinin S.A., Coats A.C. Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear-canal. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure-tone exposures. Hear. Res. 28:1987;191-208.
21. 2 in rabbits. Abstracts of the 24th Midwinter Research Meeting of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, p. 382.
22. Mills D.M. Interpretation of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. I. Two stimulus tones. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 102:1997;413-429.
23. Mills D.M., Rubel E.W. Development of distortion product emissions in the gerbil: 'filter' response and signal delay. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101:1997;395-411.
24. Müller M. The cochlear place-frequency map of the adult and developing mongolian gerbil. Hear. Res. 94:1996;148-156.
25. Neely, S.T., Stover, L.J., 1997. A generation of distortion products in a model of cochlear mechanics. In: Lewis, E.R., Long, G.R., Lyon, R.F., Narins, P.M., Steele, C.R., Hecht-Poinar, E. (Eds.), Diversity in Auditory Mechanics. World Scientific, Singapore, pp. 434-440.
26. Ohlemiller K.K., Siegel J.H. Cochlear basal and apical differences reflected in the effects of cooling on responses of single auditory nerve fibers. Hear. Res. 80:1994;174-190.
27. Ohlemiller K.K., Echteler S.M., Siegel J.H. Factors that influence rate-versus-intensity relations in single cochlear nerve fibers of the gerbil. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90:1991;274-287.
28. O'Mahoney C.F., Kemp D.T. Distortion product otoacoustic emission delay measurement in human ears. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97:1995;3721-3735.
29. Probst R., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89:1991;2027-2067.
30. Ravicz M.E., Rosowski J.J., Voigt H.F. Sound-power collection by the auditory periphery of the mongolian gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus. II. External-ear radiation impedance and power collection. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99:1996;3044-3063.
31. Ryan A. Hearing sensitivity of the mongolian gerbil, Meriones unguiculatus. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 59:1975;1222-1226.
32. Schmiedt R.A., Zwislocki J.J. Comparison of sound-transmission and cochlear-microphonic characteristics in Mongolian gerbil and guinea pig. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 61:1977;133-149.
33. Schmiedt R.A., Zwislocki J.J. Low-frequency neural and cochlear-microphonic tuning curves in the gerbil. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64:1978;502-507.
34. Sewell W.F. The effects of furosemide on the endocochlear potential and auditory-nerve fiber tuning curves in cats. Hear. Res. 14:1984;305-314.
35. Shera C.A., Guinan J.J. Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise from two fundamentally different mechanisms: A taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105:1999;782-798.
36. Stover L.J., Neely S.T., Gorga M.P. Latency and multiple sources of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99:1996;1016-1024.
37. Talmadge C.L., Long G.R., Tubis A., Dhar S. Experimental confirmation of the two-source interference model for the fine structure of distortion product otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105:1999;275-292.
38. 2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 92:1992;2662-2682.
39. Whitehead M.L., McCoy M.J., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97:1995;2346-2358.
40. Whitehead M.L., Stagner B.B., McCoy M.J., Lonsbury-Martin B.L., Martin G.K. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. II. Asymmetry in L1, L2 space. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97:1995;2359-2377.
41. Whitehead, M.L., Lonsbury-Martin, B.L., Martin, G.K., McCoy, M.J., 1996a. Otoacoustic emissions: Animal models and clinical observations. In: Van De Water, T.R., Popper, A.N., Fay, R.R. (Eds.), Clinical Aaspects of Hearing, Springer Verlag, New York, pp. 199-257.
42. Whitehead M.L., Stagner B.B., Martin G.K., Lonsbury-Martin B.L. Visualization of the onset of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, and measurement of their latency. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100:1996;1663-1679.