Comparison of 180° and 360° data acquisition for determination of left ventricular function from gated myocardial perfusion tomography and gated blood pool tomography

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Volumn 30, Issue 11, 2003, Pages 1498-1504

  Vanhove, Christian ^a   Franken, Philippe R ^a   Defrise, Michel ^a   Bossuyt, Axel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BRUSSELS   (Belgium)

Author keywords

180 versus 360 acquisition; Gated blood pool tomography; Gated myocardial perfusion tomography; Left ventricular function

Indexed keywords

SERUM ALBUMIN; TETROFOSMIN TC 99M; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; MACROSALB TC 99M; ORGANOPHOSPHORUS COMPOUND; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT; TECHNETIUM COMPLEX; TECHNETIUM TC 99M 1,2 BIS(BIS(2 ETHOXYETHYL)PHOSPHINO)ETHANE; TECHNETIUM TC 99M 1,2-BIS(BIS(2-ETHOXYETHYL)PHOSPHINO)ETHANE;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE VOLUME; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; GATED IMAGING; HEART STROKE VOLUME; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY; SCINTISCANNING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; STATISTICS; VALIDATION STUDY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; GATED BLOOD-POOL IMAGING; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANOPHOSPHORUS COMPOUNDS; ORGANOTECHNETIUM COMPOUNDS; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS; STROKE VOLUME; TECHNETIUM TC 99M AGGREGATED ALBUMIN; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 3342880958     PISSN: 16197070     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-003-1267-1     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Coleman RE, Jaszczak RJ, Cobb FR. Comparison of 180° and 360° data collection in thallium-201 imaging using single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT): concise communication. J Nucl Med 1982; 23:655-660.
2. Knesaurek K, King MA, Glick SJ, Penny BC. Investigation of causes of geometric distortion in 180° and 360° angular sampling in SPECT. J Nucl Med 1989; 30:1666-1675.
3. Hoffman EJ. 180° compared with 360° sampling in SPECT. J Nucl Med 1982; 23:745-747.
4. Liu YH, Lam PT, Sinusas AJ, Wackers FJ. Differential effect of 180° and 360° acquisition orbits on the accuracy of SPECT imaging: quantitative evaluation in phantoms. J Nucl Med 2002; 43:1115-1124.
5. Tamaki N, Mukai T, Ishii Y, Fujita T, Yamamoto K, Minato K, Yonekura Y, Tamaki S, Kambara H, Kawai C, Torizuka K. Comparative study of thallium emission myocardium tomography with 180° and 360° data collection. J Nucl Med 1982; 23:661-666.
6. Freeman MR, Konstantinou C, Barr A, Greysin NC. Clinical comparison of 180° and 360° data collection of technetium 99m sestamibi SPECT for detection of coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 1998; 5:14-18.
7. Eisner RL, Nowak DJ, Pettigrew R, et al. Fundamentals of 180 degree acquisition and reconstruction in SPECT imaging. J Nucl Med 1986; 27:1717-1728.
8. Maublant JC, Peycelon P, Kwiatkowski F, et al. Comparison between 180 degree and 360 degree data collection in technetium-99m MIBI SPECT of the myocardium. J Nucl Med 1989; 30:295-300.
9. DePuey EG, Garcia EV. Updated imaging guidelines for nuclear cardiology procedures. J Nucl Cardiol 2001; 8: G1-G58.
10. Snyder D, Miller M. Random point processes in time and space, 2nd edn. New York: Springer, 1991.
11. Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, Flannery BP. Numerical recipes in C. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
12. Devroye L. Non-uniform random variate generation. New York: Springer, 1986.
13. Germano G, Kiat H, Kavanagh PB, et al. Automatic quantification of ejection fraction from gated myocardial perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med 1995; 36:2138-2147.
14. Vanhove C, Franken PR, Defrise M, Momen A, Everaert H, Bossuyt A. Automatic determination of left ventricular ejection fraction from gated blood pool tomography. J Nucl Med 2001; 42:401-407.
15. Vanhove C, Franken PR. Left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes from gated blood pool tomography: comparison between two automatic algorithms working in three-dimensional space. J Nucl Cardiol 2001; 8:466-471.
16. Vanhove C, Walgraeve N, De Geeter F, Franken PR. Gated myocardial perfusion tomography versus gated blood pool tomography to calculate left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. Eur J Nucl Med 2002; 29:735-741.
17. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet 1986; 1:307-310.
18. Kubo N, Mabuchi M, Katoh C, et al. Accuracy and reproducibility of left ventricular function from quantitative, gated, single photon emission computed tomography using dynamic myocardial phantoms: effect of pre-reconstruction filters. Nucl Med Commun 2002; 23:529-536.
19. Nakajima K, Taki J, Higuchi T, et al. Gated SPET quantification of small hearts: mathematical simulation and clinical application. Eur J Nucl Med 2000; 27:1372-1379.
20. Achert A, King MA, Dahlberg ST, et al. An investigation of the estimation of ejection fractions and cardiac volumes by a quantitative gated SPECT software package on simulated gated SPECT images. J Nucl Cardiol 1998; 5:144-152.
21. Nakajima K, Higuchi T, Taki J, Kawano M, Tonami N. Accuracy of ventricular volume and ejection fraction measured by gated myocardial SPECT: comparison of 4 software programs. J Nucl Med 2001; 42:1571-1578.