A new and efficient approach for analysis of a saturated synchronous generator under the load rejection test

Electric Power Components and Systems

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 539-563

  Wamkeue, Rene ^a   Kamwa, I ^b   Baetscher, F ^c   El Hayek, J ^d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC EN ABITIBI TÉMISCAMINGUE   (Canada)

^b HYDRO QUÉBEC   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^d Ecole D Ingénieurs et D Architectes de Friburg   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Experiment; Hybrid state model; Load rejection; Saturation; Simulation; Synchronous machine

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC LOADS; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTROMECHANICAL DEVICES; EXPERIMENTS; SIMULATION;

HYBRID STATE MODEL; LOAD REJECTION; SYNCHRONOUS MACHINE; VOLTAGE TRANSIENTS;

SYNCHRONOUS GENERATORS;

EID: 33344471437     PISSN: 15325008     EISSN: 15325016     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15325000500360827     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. J. Holtz and J. Quan, “Sensorless vector control of induction motors at very low speed using nonlinear inverter model and parameter identification,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 38, pp. 1087–1095, July/August 2002.
2. S. Morimoto, Y. Takeda, T. Hirasa, and K. Taniguchi., “Expansion of operating limits for permanent magnet motor by current vector control considering inverter capacity,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 26, pp. 866–871, September/October 1990.
3. L. A. Jones and J. H. Lang, “A state observer for the permanent-magnet synchronous motor,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 36, pp. 174–382, August 1989.
4. G. Grelet and G. Clerc, Actionneurs Électriques, Principes, Modèles, Commande, Eyrolles, Paris, 1999.
5. I. Boldea and S. A. Nasar, Vector Control of AC Drives, Florida: CRC Press, 1992.
6. R. Wamkeue and I. Kamwa, “Load rejection analysis of self-excited induction generators for autonomous power generation,” Electric Power Components and Systems, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 263–275, 2002.
7. P. Vas, Vector Control of AC Machines, Oxford University Press, 1988.
8. H. A. Toliyat and S. G. Campbell, DSP-Based Electromechanical Motion Control, CRC Press, 2004.
9. R. Wamkeue, I. Kamwa, and X. Dai-Do, “Line-to-line short-circuit test based maximum likelihood estimation of stability model of large generators,” IEEE Trans. on Energy Conversion, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 167–174, June 1999.
10. IEEE/ANSI Standard 115, Test Procedures for Synchronous Machines, 1996.
11. R. Wamkeue, I. Kamwa, and X. Dai-Do, “Current-controlled modeling of synchronous machines with application to stator and rotor decrement test analysis,” ELECTRIMACS Proc., vol. 1/3, Saint Nazaire, France, pp. 169–176, September 1996.
12. F. P. De Mello and L. H. Nannet, “Validation of synchronous machine models and derivation of model parameters from tests,” IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. PAS-100, no. 2, pp. 662–672, February 1981.
13. T. Sugiyama, T. Nishiwaki, S. Takeda, and S. Abe, “Measurements of synchronous-machine parameters under operating conditions,” IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. PAS-101, no. 4, pp. 895–904, April 1982.
14. EPRI, Confirmation of test methods for synchronous-machine dynamic performance model, EPRI Report, EL-5736, Power Consumer Inc., August 1988.
15. IEEE Std 1110, Guide for Synchronous Generator Modeling Practices in Stability Analysis, 2002.
16. IEEE Std 115, Test Procedures for Synchronous Machines, 1995.
17. K. Hirayama, “Practical detailed model for generators,” IEEE Trans. on Energy Conversion, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 105–110, March 1995.
18. E. D. C. Bortoni and J. A. Jardini, “Synchronous machines parameter identification using load rejection test data,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 242–247, June 2002.
19. S. A. Tahan and I. Kamwa, “A two-factor saturation model for synchronous machines with multiple rotor circuits,” IEEE Trans. on Energy Conversion, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 609–616, December 1995.
20. A. M. El-Serafi and J. Wu, “Determination of the parameter representing the cross-magnetizing effect in saturated synchronous machines,” IEEE Trans. on Energy Conversion, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 333–340, 1993.
21. J. C. Li, “Analytical model of the cross magnetizing effect in saturated synchronous machines,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 37, pp. 19–28, 1996.
22. E. Levi, “Impact of dynamic cross-saturation on accuracy of saturated synchronous machine models,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 224–230, June 2000.
23. A. M. El-Serafi and N. C. Kar, “Methods for determining the q-axis saturation characteristics of salient-pole synchronous machines from the measured d-axis characteristics,” IEEE Transactions on Energy Conversion, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 80–86, March 2003.
24. G. G. Johntone and J. H. B. Deane, “Relations between two-port parameters,” Int. J. Electron., vol. 1, no. 71, pp. 107–116, 1991.
25. I. Kamwa, P. Viarouge, H. Le-Huy, and E. J. Dickinson, “Three-transfer-function approach for building phenomenological models of synchronous machines,” IEE Proc., Generation, Transmission, Distribution, vol. 141, no. 2, pp. 89–98, March 1994.
26. P. Guillaume, R. Pintelon, and J. Schoukens, “Parametric identification of two-port models of synchronous machines,” IEEE Trans., vol. IM-40, no. 2, pp. 233–239, 1992.
27. V.-Q. Do and A. O. Barry, “A real-time model of synchronous machine based on digital signal processors,” IEEE Trans. on Energy Conversion, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 60–66, March 1993.
28. P. Dandeno and A. T. Poray, “Development of detailed turbo-generator equivalent circuits from standstill frequency response measurements,” IEEE Trans. on Power Apparatus and Systems, vol. PAS-100, pp. 1656–1665, April 1981.
29. R. Wamkeue, I. Kamwa, X. Dai-Do, and A. Keyhani, “Iteratively reweighted least squares for maximum likelihood identification of synchronous machine parameters from on-line tests,” IEEE Trans. on Energy Conversion, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 159–166, June 1999.
30. S. A. Nasar, Electric Machines and Power Systems, vol. 1, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1995.