Using conceptests to assess and improve student conceptual understanding in introductory geoscience courses

Journal of Geoscience Education

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 61-68

  McConnell, David A ^a   Steer, David N ^a   Owens, Katharine D ^a   Knott, Jeffrey R ^b   Van Horn, Stephen ^c   Borowski, Walter ^d   Dick, Jeffrey ^e   Foos, Annabelle ^a   Malone, Michelle ^f   McGrew, Heidi ^g   Greer, Lisa ^h   Heaney, Peter J ⁱ  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AKRON   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MUSKINGUM COLLEGE   (United States)

^d EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e YOUNGSTOWN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON   (United States)

^h WASHINGTON AND LEE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁱ PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; GEOLOGY;

EID: 33344455406     PISSN: 10899995     EISSN: 10899995     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5408/1089-9995-54.1.61     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. American Geophysical Union, 1994, Report of the AGU Chapman Conference on scrutiny of undergraduate geoscience education, 55p.
2. Angelo, T.A., 1993 A "Teacher's dozen", American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, April, p. 3-13.
3. Astin, A.W., and Astin, H.S., 1993, Undergraduate Science Education: The Impact of different college environments on the educational pipeline in the sciences, Higher Education Research Institute, Los Angeles.
4. Bykerk-Kauffman, A., 1995, Using cooperative learning in college geology classes, Journal of Geological Education, v.43, p. 309-316.
5. Chickering, A.W., and Gamson, Z.F., 1987, Seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education, American Association of Higher Education Bulletin, March, p. 3-7.
6. Cox, A.J., and Junkin, W.F., III, 2002, Enhanced student learning in the introductory physics laboratory, Physics Education, v. 37, p. 37-44.
7. Crouch, C.H., and Mazur, E., 2001, Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results, American Journal of Physics, v. 69, p. 970-977.
8. Ebert-May, D., Brewer, C., and Allred, S., 1997, Innovation in large lectures - teaching for active learning, Bioscience, v.47, p. 601-607
9. Fleming, N., 1995, I'm different; not dumb: Modes of presentation (V.A.R.K.) in the tertiary classroom, in Zelmer, A., ed., Research and Development in Higher Education, Proceedings of the 1995 Annual Conference of the Higher Education and Research Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA), HERDSA, v.18, p. 308-313.
10. Gibbons, A., 1994, A time of trials and tribulations, Science, v.266, p. 844, 845, and 851.
11. Greer, L., and Heaney, P.J., 2004, Real-time analysis of student comprehension: An assessment of electronic student response technology in an introductory Earth Science course, Journal of Geoscience Education, v. 52, p. 345-351.
12. Hake, R.R., 1998, Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses, American Journal of Physics, v. 66, p. 64-74.
13. Handelsman, J., Ebert-May, D., Beichner, R., Bruns, P., Chang, A., DeHaan, R., Gentile, J., Lauffer, S., Stewart, J., Tilghman, S.M., and Wood, W.B., 2004, Scientific teaching, Science, v. 304, p. 521-522.
14. Jones, L.R., Miller, A.G., and Watts, J.F., 2001, Conceptual learning and quantitative problem solving: Friends or Foes?, Journal of Cooperation and Collaboration in College Teaching, v. 10, p. 109-116.
15. Judson, E., and Sawada, D., 2002, Learning from past and present: Electronic response systems in college lecture halls, Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teachning, v. 21, p. 167-181.
16. Landis, C.R., Ellis, A.B., Lisensk, G.C., Lorenz, J.K., Meeker, K., and Wamser, C.C., 2001, Chemistry conceptests: A pathway to interactive classrooms: Prentice Hall, 99p.
17. Libarkin, J.C., and Anderson, S.W., 2005, Science concept inventory development in higher education: A mixed-methods approach in the geosciences, In press, Journal of College Science Teaching.
18. Kovac, J., 1999, Student active learning methods in general chemistry, Journal of Chemical Education, v. 76, p. 120-124.
19. Mazur, E., 1997, Peer instruction: A user's manual, Prentice Hall, 253 p.
20. Macdonald, R.H. and Korinek, L., 1995, Cooperative-learning activities in large entry-level geology courses, Journal of Geological Education, v. 43, p. 341-345.
21. McConnell, D.A., Steer, D.N., and Owens, K.D., 2003, Assessment and active learning strategies for introductory geology courses, Journal of Geoscience Education, v. 51, p. 205-216.
22. McConnell, D.A., Steer, D.N., Owens, K.D., and Knight, C., 2005, How students think: Implications for learning in introductory geoscience courses, Journal of Geoscience Education, v. 53, p. 462-470.
23. McManus, D.A., 2002, The two paradigms of education and the peer review of teaching, Journal of Geoscience Education, v.49, p. 423-434.
24. Meltzer, D.E., and Manivannan, K., 2002, Transforming the lecture-hall environment: The fully interactive physics lecture, American Journal of Physics, v.70, p.639-654.
25. Murck, B., 1999, Promoting and evaluating participation in high-enrollment undergraduate courses, Journal of Geoscience Education, v. 47, p. 131-134.
26. Murray, H., 1983, Low-inference classroom teaching behaviors and student ratings of college teaching effectiveness, Journal of Educational Psychology, v. 75, p. 138-149.
27. Murray, K. and R. MacDonald, 1997, The disjunction between lecturer's conceptions of teaching and their claimed educational practice, Higher Education, v. 33, p. 331-349.
28. National Research Council, 1997, Science teaching reconsidered, National Academy Press, 88 p.
29. National Science Foundation, 1996, Shaping the future: New expectations for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology, 76 p.
30. National Science Board, 2002 Science and Engineering Indicators, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
31. National Science Board, 2003, The science and engineering workforce: Realizing America's potential, National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.
32. Nelson, C.E., 1996, Student diversity requires different approaches to college teaching, even in math and science, American Behavioral Scientist, v. 40, p. 165-175.
33. Piepmeier, E., Jr., 1998, Use of conceptests in a large lecture course to provide active student involvement and peer teaching, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, v. 62, p. 347-351.
34. Pilzer, S., 2001, Peer instruction in physics and mathematics, Primus, v. 11, p. 185-192.
35. Rao, S.P., and DiCarlo, S.E., 2000, Peer instruction improves performance on quizzes. Advances in Physiology Education, v. 24, p. 51-55.
36. Reynolds, S.J., and Peacock, S.M., 1998, Slide observations - Promoting active learning, landscape appreciation, and critical thinking in introductory geology courses, Journal of Geoscience Education, v.46, p. 421-426.
37. Seymour, E., and Hewitt, N.M., 1997, Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences, Westview Press, Boulder.
38. Sokoloff, D.R., and Thornton, R.K., 1997, Using interactive lecture demonstrations to create an active learning environment, The Physics Teacher, v.35, p. 340-347.
39. Sorcinelli, M.D., 1991, Research findings on the seven principles, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, #47, p. 13-25.
40. Stokstad, E., 2003, Reintroducing the intro course, Science, v. 293, p. 1608-1610.
41. Strenta, A.C., Elliott, R., Adair, R., Matier, and Scott, J., 1994, Choosing and leaving science in highly selective institutions, Research in Higher Education, v. 35, #5, p. 513-547.
42. Tobias, S., 1990, They're not dumb, they're different: Stalking the second tier, Research Corporation, 94 p.
43. Uno, G.E., 1997, Learning about learning through teaching about inquiry, in, Student Active Science: Models of Innovation in College Science Teachings, eds. A.P. McNeal and C. D'Avanzo, p. 189-198, Saunders College Publishing.
44. Wenk, L., Dufresne, R., Gerace, W., Leonard, W., and Mestre, J., 1997, Technology-assisted active learning in large lectures, in, Student Active Science: Models of Innovation in College Science Teachings, eds. A.P. McNeal and C. D'Av anzo, p. 431-451, Saunders College Publishing.