Mylar: A degree-of-interest model for IDEs

AOSD 2005: 4th International Conference on Aspect-Oriented Software Development - Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 159-168

  Kersten, Mik ^a   Murphy, Gail C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Development tools; Program structure; Program views; Software evolution; Software tasks; Task representation

Indexed keywords

CODES (SYMBOLS); COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

DEVELOPMENT TOOLS; PROGRAM STRUCTURE; PROGRAM VIEWS; SOFTWARE EVOLUTION; SOFTWARE TASKS; TASK REPRESENTATION;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 33244494424     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1052898.1052912     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Card, S. K. and D. Nation. Degree-of-Interest Trees: A Component of an Attention-Reactive User Interface. Advanced Visual Interfaces Conference, Trento, Italy, 2002.
2. Cockburn, A. Supporting tailorable program visualisation through literate programming and fisheye views. Information & Software Technology 43(13), 2001, 745-758.
3. Findlater, L., McGrenere, J. A comparison of static, adaptive, and adaptable menus. In Proceedings of Computer-Interaction, 2004, 89-96.
4. Furnas, G.W. Generalized Fisheye views. In Human Factors in Computing Systems III. Proceedings of the CHI'86 conference. ACM, Amsterdam, 1986, 16-23.
5. Gosling, J., Joy, B., and Steele, G., Bracha, G.: The Java Language Specification. Second Edition. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts, 2000.
6. Harrison, W., Ossher, H., Tarr, P., Kruskal, V. and Tip, F. CAT: A Toolkit for Assembling Concerns. Research Report RC22686, IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, NY, December, 2002.
7. Hill, W. C., Hollan, J. D., Wroblewski, D., and McCandless, T. Edit wear and read wear. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors and Computing Systems, 1992, 3-9.
8. Janzen, D. and De Voider, K. Navigating and querying code without getting lost. In Proceedings of Aspect Oriented Software Development, Boston, 2003, 178-187.
9. Janzen, D. and de Voider, K. Programming With Crosscutting Effective Views, In Proceedings of the European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Springer-Verlag, Oslo, 2004, 197-222.
10. Kiczales, G., et al. An Overview of AspectJ. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming. Springer-Verlag, Budapest, 2001, 327-353.
11. Kiczales, G., et al. Aspect-Oriented Programming. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming. Springer-Verlag, Finland, 1997, 220-242.
12. Munzner, T., Guimbretiere, F., Tasiran, S., Zhang, L. and Zhou, Y. TreeJuxtaposer: Scalable Tree Comparison using Focus+Context with Guaranteed Visibility. SIGGRAPH published as ACM Transactions on Graphics 22(3), 2003, 453-462.
13. Rieman, J. A field study of exploratory learning strategies. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 3, 3, 1996, 189-218.
14. Robillard, M. P., Murphy, G. C. Automatically Inferring Concern Code from Program Investigation Activities. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, 2003, 225-234.
15. Robillard, M. P., Murphy, G. C. FEAT. A Tool for Locating, Describing, and Analyzing Concerns in Source Code. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003, 822-823.
16. Teitelman, W. and Masinter, L. The Interlisp programming environment. IEEE Computer, vol. 14, 1981, 25-34.