Likelihood of reporting adverse events in community pharmacy: An experimental study

Quality and Safety in Health Care

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 48-52

  Ashcroft, D M ^a   Morecroft, C ^a   Parker, D ^a   Noyce, P R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INCIDENT REPORT; MEDICAL STAFF; PATIENT SAFETY; PHARMACIST; PHARMACY; QUESTIONNAIRE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; DATA COLLECTION; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MEDICATION ERRORS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PHARMACIES; PHARMACISTS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK MANAGEMENT; SAFETY MANAGEMENT;

EID: 33244482489     PISSN: 14753898     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014639     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Department of Health. An organisation with a memory, A report from an expert working group on learning from adverse events in the NHS. London: Department of Health, 2000.
2. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999.
3. Dovey SM, Phillips RL. What should we report to medical error reporting systems? Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:322-3.
4. Leape LL. Reporting of adverse events. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1633-8.
5. National Patient Safety Agency. Seven steps to patient safety. London: National Patient Safety Agency, 2004.
6. Barach P, Small SD. Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems. BMJ 2000;320:759-63.
7. Ashcroft D, Morecroft C, Parker D, et al. Patient safety in community pharmacy: understanding errors and managing risk. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, 2005.
8. Pharmaceutical Services Negotiating Committee (PSNC). The new contract for community pharmacy. Amersham: PSNC, 2004.
9. Reason J, Parker D, Lawton R. Organizational controls and safety: the varieties of rule-related behaviour. J Occup Organ Psychol 1998;71:289-99.
10. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS for Windows. London: Sage, 2000.
11. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1990.
12. Department of Health. General Pharmaceutical Services in England and Wales 1994-95 to 2003-2004. London: Department of Health, 2005.
13. Ashcroft DM, Quinlan P, Blenkinsopp A. Prospective study of the incidence, nature and causes of dispensing errors in community pharmacies. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2005;14:327-32.
14. Stanhope N, Crowley-Murphy M, Vincent C, et al. An evaluation of adverse incident reporting. J Eval Clin Pract 1999;5:5-12.
15. Lawton R, Parker D. Barriers to incident reporting in a healthcare system. Qual Saf Health Care 2002;11:15-8.
16. Kingston MJ, Evans SM, Smith BJ, et al. Attitudes of doctors and nurses towards incident reporting: a qualitative analysis. Med J Aust 2004;181:36-9.
17. Jeffe DB, Dunagan WC, Garbutt J, et al. Using focus groups to understand physicians' and nurses' perspectives on error reporting in hospitals. Jt Comm J Qual Saf 2004;30:471-9.
18. White C. Doctors mistrust systems for reporting medical mistakes. BMJ 2004;329:12-3.
19. Berwick D. Disseminating innovations in health care. JAMA 2003;289:1969-75.
20. Nieva VF, Sorra J. Safety culture assessment: a tool for improving patient safety in healthcare organizations. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12(Suppl N):ii17-23.
21. Nathan A. Reporting errors: can a 'fair blame' culture really work for pharmacists. Pharm J 2004;272:707.
22. Hassell K. Pharmacist work patterns: summary of the 2003 pharmacy workforce census. London: Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, 2004.