Barriers to incident reporting in a healthcare system

Quality and Safety in Health Care

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 15-18

  Lawton, Rebeccal ^a   Parker, D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERROR; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; MEDICAL STAFF; MIDWIFE; NORMAL HUMAN; NURSE ATTITUDE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE;

EID: 0036489342     PISSN: 09638172     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/qhc.11.1.15     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Hollnagel E. Human reliability Analysis: Context and Control. London: Academic Press, 1993.
2. Reason J. Managing the Risks of Organisational Accidents. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate: 1997.
3. Vincent C, Taylor-Adams S, Stanhope N. Framework for analysing risk and safety in clinical medicine. BMJ 1998;316:1154-7.
4. Department of Health. An Organisation with a Memory. London: The Stationery Office, 2000.
5. Stanhope N, Crowley-Murphy M, Vincent C, et al. An evaluation of adverse incident reporting. J Eval Clin Pract 1999;5:5-12.
6. Walker SB, Lowe MJ. Nurses' views on reporting medication incidents. Int J Nursing Pract 1998;4:97-102.
7. Weingart SN, Ship AN, Aronson MD. Confidential clinician reported surveillance of adverse events among medical inpatients. J Gen Intern Med 2000;15:470-7.
8. Barach P, Small SD. Reporting and preventing medical mishaps: Lessons from non-medical near miss reporting systems. BMJ 2000;320:759-63.
9. Rosenthal M. How doctors think about medical mishaps. In: Rosenthal M, Mulcahy L, Lloyd-Bostock S, eds. Medical Mishaps. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1999: 141-53.
10. Liang BA. Error in medicine: Legal impediments to US reform. J Health Politics Policy 1999;24:27-58.
11. Hurwitz B. Guidelines and jurisprudence: Advice, guidance or regulation. Epidemiol Preview 1998;22:85-93.
12. Lawton R. Not working to rule: Understanding procedural violations at work. Safety Sci 1998;28:77-95.
13. Lawton R, Parker D. Procedures and the professional: The case of the British NHS. Soc Sci Med 1999;48:353-61.
14. Reason JT, Manstead A, Stradling S, et al. Errors and violations on the roads: A real distinction? Ergonomics 1990;33:1315-32.
15. Reason JT, Parker D, Lawton R. Organisational control and the varieties of rule related behaviour. J Organisat Occup Psychol 1998;71:289-304.
16. Lawton R, Parker D. Judgements of the rule-related behaviour of healthcare professionals: An experimental study. Br J Health Psychol 2002 (in press).
17. Grol R. National standard setting for quality of care in general practice: Attitudes of general practitioners and response to a set of standards. Br J Gen Pract 1990;40:361-4.
18. Tunis SR, Hayward RSA, Wilson MC, et al. Internists' altitudes about clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:956-63.