Effect of pressure on a heavy-atom isotope effect of yeast alcohol dehydrogenase

Journal of the American Chemical Society

Volumn 128, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1868-1872

  Park, Hyun ^b   Girdaukas, Gary G ^a   Northrop, Dexter B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b Korea Research Institute of Ships and Ocean Engineering   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLS; BIOCHEMISTRY; HYDROGEN BONDS; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; ISOTOPES; MASS SPECTROMETRY; OXIDATION; YEAST;

BENZYL ALCOHOL; KINETIC PARAMETERS; TRANSITION STATE;

ENZYMES;

ALCOHOL; ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE; BENZYL ALCOHOL; CARBON; CARBON 13; DEUTERIUM; HYDROGEN;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL BOND; ENVIRONMENTAL TEMPERATURE; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; KINETICS; MASS SPECTROMETRY; OXIDATION; YEAST;

ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE; DEUTERIUM; HYDROSTATIC PRESSURE; KINETICS; YEASTS;

EID: 33244478782     PISSN: 00027863     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ja056525e     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bigeleisen, J.; Wolfsberg, M. Adv. Phys. Chem. 1958, 1, 15-76.
2. Isaacs, N. S. In Isotope Effects in Organic Chemistry, Volume 6; Buncel, E., Lee, C. C., Eds.; Elsevier: London, UK, 1984; pp 67-105.
3. (a) Lewis, E. S.; Robinson, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 4337.
4. (b) Lewis, E. M.; Perry, J. M.; Grinstein, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 709.
5. Isaacs, N. S.; Javaid, K.; Rannala, E. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1987, 709-711.
6. Bell, R. P. The Tunnel Effecr in Chemistry; Chapman and Hall: London and New York, 1980.
7. Northrop, D. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 3521-3524.
8. Previous papers from this laboratory incorrectly listed a value of 82.0578 in the text for the gas constant. This value applies to pressures measured in atmospheres, not bars. However, all computer regression analyses in these papers used the correct value of 83.133739.
9. (a) Huskey, W. P.; Schowen, R. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 5704-5706.
10. (b) Cha, Y.; Murray, C. J.; Klinman, J. P. Science 1989, 243, 1325-1330.
11. Northrop, D. B.; Cho, Y. K. Biochemistry 2000, 39, 2406-2412.
12. Park, H.; Kidman, G.; Northrop, D. B. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2005, 433, 335-340.
13. Zuev, P. S.; Sheridan, R. S.; Albu, T. V.; Truhlar, D. G.; Hrovat, D. A.; Borden, W. T. Science 2003, 299, 867-870.
14. Northrop, D. B. J. Chem. Educ. 1998, 75, 1153-1157.
15. Northrop, D. B. In Isotope Effects on Enzyme-Catalyzed Reactions; Cleland, W. W., O'Leary, M. H., Northrop, D. B., Eds.; University Park Press: Baltimore, 1977; pp 122-152.
16. Goshe, M. B.; Anderson, V. E. Anal. Biochem. 1995, 231, 387-392.
17. Huskey, P. W. In Enzyme Mechanism from Isotope Effects; Cook, P. F., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1991; pp 331-338.
18. Scharschmidt, M.; Fisher, M. A.; Cleland, W. W. Biochemistry 1984, 23, 5471-5478.
19. Swain, C. G.; Stivers, E. C.; Reuwer, J. F., Jr.; Schaad, L. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 5885-5893.
20. (a) Eyring, H.; Lumry, R.; Spikes, J. In Mechanism of Enzyme Action; McElroy, W., Glass, G., Eds.; Johns Hopkins University Press: Baltimore, MD, 1954; pp 123-135.
21. (b) Lumry, R.; Eyring, H. J. Phys. Chem. 1954 58, 110-120.
22. (c) Lumry, R.; Biltonen, R. In Structure and Stability of Biological Macromolecules; Timasheff, S. N., Fasman, G. D., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1969; pp 65-212.
23. (d) Lumry, R. In Mechanism of Enzyme Action, Vol. 2; Kuby, S. A., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1991; pp 3-81.
24. (e) Lumry, R. In Protein-Solvent Interactions; Gregory, R. B., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1995; pp 1-141.
25. (f) Lumry, R. In Energetics of Biological Macromolecules; Johnson, M. L., Ackers, G. K., Eds.; Methods in Enzymology 259; Academic Press: New York, 1995; pp 628-720.
26. (g) Lumry, R. Biophys. J. 2000, 78, 156A (916-Pos Part 2).
27. (h) Lumry, R. J. Biophys. Chem. 2002, 101, 93-98.
28. Lowry, T. H.; Richardson, K. S. Mechanism and Theory in Organic Chemistry, 3rd ed.; Harper & Row: New York. 1987; pp 209-210.
29. Luo, J.; Bruice, T. C. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101, 13152-13156.
30. (a) Hayward, S. Proteins 1999, 36, 425-435.
31. (b) Gerstein, M.; Lesk, A. M.; Chothia, C. Biochemistry 1994, 33, 6739-6749.
32. Schultz-Heienbrok, R.; Maier, T.; Sträter, N. Biochemistry 2005, 44, 2244-2252.
33. (a) Hammes-Sehiffer, S. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 13335-13343.
34. (b) Masgrau, L.; Basran, J.; Hothi, P.; Sutcliffe, M. J.; Scrutton, N. S. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2004, 428, 41-51.
35. (c) Liang, Z. X.; Klinman, J. P. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2004, 14, 648-655.
36. 18f refers to this phenomenon as an "overshoot". The same reviewer suggested that, because pressure drives water into the interior of proteins, pressure may cause the dynamics in proteins to be more pronounced. For example, some of the inserted water will solvate buried ions, so some salt bridges could be weakened or broken under pressure, making the protein more flexible.
37. Kitamura, Y.; Itoh, T. J. Sol. Chem. 1987, 16, 715-725.
38. Equation 8 was derived for trace labeled substrates. When dealing with comparable levels of labeled and unlabeled substrates, a more complex form of eq 4 applies (see eq 55 of Cleland, W. W. In Investigations of Rates and Mechanisms of Reactions, Vol. 6; Bernasconi, C. F., Ed.; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 1986; pp 791-870). However, the differences are insignificant with small isotope effects of 5% or less (W. W. Cleland, personal communication).