Product architecture development with quantitative functional models

Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference

Volumn 3, Issue , 1999, Pages 247-259

  Stone, Robert B ^a   Wood, Kristin L ^b   Crawford, Richard H ^b  

^a MISSOURI UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

Customer needs; Functional modeling; Modular design; Product architecture

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURE; CONSUMER PRODUCTS; SALES;

DESIGN KNOWLEDGE; DEVELOPING PRODUCT; MODULE IDENTIFICATIONS; NUMERICAL MANIPULATION; PRODUCT ARCHITECTURE; PRODUCT DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; PRODUCT DESIGN KNOWLEDGE; PRODUCT FAMILIES;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 78751512773     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/DETC99/DTM-8764     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. Allen, K. and Carlson-Skalak, S., 1998, 1/2Defining.Product Architecture During Conceptual Design, 1/2 Accepted to Proceedings of DETC98, DETC98/DTM-5650, Atlanta, GA.
2. Altshuller, G., 1984, Creativity as an Exact Science, Gordon and Branch Publishers.
3. Bradley, S. and Agogino, A., 1994, 1/2An Intelligent. Real Time Design Methodology for Component Selection: An Approach to Managing Uncertainty, 1/2 Journal of Mechanical Design, 116:980-988.
4. Cutherell, D., 1996, 1/2Chapter 16: Product Architecture, 1/2 The PDMA Handbook of New Product Development, M. Rosenau Jr., et al., ed., John Wiley and Sons.
5. Griffen, A. and Hauser, J., 1993, 1/2The Voice of the. Customer, 1/2 Marketing Science, 12(l):l-27.
6. Gu, P., Hashemian, S. and Sosale, S., 1997, 1/2An Integrated Modular Design Methodology for Life-Cycle Engineering, 1/2 Annals of the CIRP, 46(1):71-74.
7. Gupta, S. and Krishnan, K., 1997, 1/2Product Family-Based Inte- . grated Component and Vendor Selection, 1/2 Department of Management Working Paper, The University of Texas at Austin
8. Krishnan, V., Singh, R., andTirupati, D., 1996, 1/2A Model-Based . Approach for Planning and Developing a Family of Technology- Based Products, 1/2 Department of Management Working Paper, The University of Texas at Austin.
9. Little, A., 1997, A Reverse Engineering Toolbox for Functional Product Measurement, Master Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.
10. Little, A., Wood, K., and McAdams, D., 1997, 1/2Functional Analysis: A Fundamental Empirical Study for Reverse Engineering, Benchmarking and Redesign, 1/2 Proceedings of the 1997 Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 97-DETC/DTM- . 3879, Sacramento, CA.
11. Marks, M., Eubanks, C., and Ishii, K., 1993, 1/2Life-Cycle Clumping of Product Designs for Ownership and Retirement, 1/2 Proceedings of the ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, DE-Vol. 53.
12. McAdams, D., Stone, R., and Wood, K., 1998, 1/2Product Similarity Based on Customer Needs, 1/2 Proceedings of DETC98, DETC98/DTM-5660, Atlanta, GA.
13. McAdams, D., Stone, R., and Wood, K., 1999, 1/2Functional Interdepehdance and Product Similarity based on Customer Needs, 1/2 To Appear Research in Engineering Design, 11(1).
14. Murdock, J., Szykman, S. and Sriram, R., 1997, 1/2An Information Modeling Framework to Support Design Databases and Repositones, Proceedings ofDETC 1/297, DETG97/DFM-4373, Sacramento, CA.
15. Newcomb, P., Bras, B., and Rosen, D., 1996, 1/2Implications of Modularity on Product Design for the Life Cycle, 1/2 Proceedings of the 1996 ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, 96-DETC/DTM-1516, Irvine, CA.
16. Otto, K. and Wood, K., 1996, 1/2A Reverse Engineering andRede- 1/2 sign Methodology for Product Evolution, 1/2 Proceedings of the 1996 ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, 96-DETC/DTM-1523^ Irvine, CA.
17. Otto, K. and Wood, K., 1997, 1/2Conceptual and Configuration Design of Products and Assemblies, 1/2 ASM Handbook, Materials Selection and Design, Vol. 20, ASM International.
18. Pahl, G. and Beitz, W., 1988, Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, Springer-Verlag.
19. Pimmler, T. and Eppinger, S., 1994, 1/2Integration Analysis of Product Decompositions, 1/2 Proceedings of the ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, DE-Vol. 68.
20. Rosen, D.-, 1996, 1/2Design of Modular Product Architectures in Discrete Design Spaces Subject to Life Cycle Issues, 1/2 Proceedings of the 1996 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, 96-DETC/DAC-1485, Iiwine, CA.
21. Schmidt, L, and Cagan, J, accepted 1997a, 1/2Optimal Configuration Design: An Integrated Approach Using Grammars, 1/2 To appear m Journal of Mechanical Design.
22. Schmidt, L. and Cagan, J., 19976, 1/2GGREADA: A Graph Grammar- Based Machine Design Algorithm, 1/2 Research in Engineering Design, 9(4): 195-213.
23. Stone, R., 1997, Towards a Theory of Modular Design, Doctoral Thesis, The University of Texas at Austin.
24. Stone, R., Wood, K., Crawford, R., 1998, 1/2AHeuristic Method to Identify Modules from a Functional Description of a Product, 1/2 Proceedings ofDETC98, DETC98/DTM-5642, Atlanta, GA.
25. Stone, R., Wood, K., Crawford, R., 1999, 1/2A Heuristic Method for Identifying Modules for Product Architectures, 1/2 To Appear Design Studies.
26. Stone, R. and Wood, K., 1999, 1/2Development of a Functional Basis for Design, 1/2 Proceedings ofDETC99, DETC99/DTM- 8765, Las Vegas, NV.
27. Ullman, D., 1997, The Mechanical Design Process 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill.
28. Uhich, K. and Eppinger, S., 1995, Product Design andDevelopment, McGraw-Hill.
29. Ulrich, K. and Tung, K., 1991, 1/2Fundamentals of Product Modularity, 1/2 Proceedings of the 1991 Winter Annual Meeting,DEVol. 39, Atlanta, GA.
30. Vadde, S., Allen, J., and Mistree, F., 1992, 1/2Catalog Design: Design Using Available Assets, 1/2 Proceedings of the 1992 ASME Design Technical Conferences, Advances in Design Automation, DE-Vol. 44-1, Scottsdale, AZ.
31. Ward, A., 1989, A Theory of Quantitative Inference Applied to a Mechanical Design Compiler, Doctoral Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
32. Ward, A. and Seering, W., 1993, 1/2Quantitative Inference in a Mechanical Design 1/2Compiler 1/2, 1/2 Journal of Mechanical Design, 115:29-35.