Update in the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism

Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 44-51

  McRae, Simon J ^a,b   Ginsberg, Jeffrey S ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Deep vein thrombosis; Diagnosis; Pulmonary embolism; Venous thrombosis

Indexed keywords

D DIMER;

CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; ECHOGRAPHY; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; LEG; LUNG EMBOLISM; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; REVIEW; SAFETY; SPIRAL COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;

BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; HUMANS; LUNG; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PULMONARY EMBOLISM; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; VENOUS THROMBOSIS;

EID: 33144465600     PISSN: 09527907     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.aco.0000192772.79032.f2     Document Type: Review

References (81)

1. White RH. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003; 107 (Suppl 1):I4-I8.
2. Barritt DW, Jordan SC. Anticoagulant drugs in the treatment of pulmonary embolism: a controlled trial. Lancet 1960; 1:1309-1312.
3. Hull RD, Raskob GE, Hirsh J, et al. Continuous intravenous heparin compared with intermittent subcutaneous heparin in the initial treatment of proximal-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 1986; 315:1109-1114.
4. Douketis JD, Kearon C, Bates S, et al. Risk of fatal pulmonary embolism in patients with treated venous thromboembolism. JAMA 1998; 279:458-462.
5. Palareti G, Leali N, Coccheri S, et al. Bleeding complications of oral anticoagulant treatment: an inception-cohort, prospective collaborative study (ISCOAT). Italian Study on Complications of Oral Anticoagulant Therapy. Lancet 1996; 348:423-428.
6. Linkins LA, Choi PT, Douketis JD. Clinical impact of bleeding in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy for venous thromboembolism: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139:893-900.
7. McLachlin J, Richards T, Paterson JC. An evaluation of clinical signs in the diagnosis of venous thrombosis. Arch Surg 1962; 85:738-744.
8. Bell WR, Simon TL, DeMets DL. The clinical features of submassive and massive pulmonary emboli. Am J Med 1977; 62:355-360.
9. Stein PD, Hull RD, Ghali WA, et al. Tracking the uptake of evidence: two decades of hospital practice trends for diagnosing deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 2003; 163:1213-1219.
10. Kearon C, Julian JA, Newman TE, Ginsberg JS. Noninvasive diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. McMaster Diagnostic Imaging Practice Guidelines Initiative. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128:663-677.
11. Kearon C. Natural history of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 2003; 107 (Suppl 1):I22-I30.
12. Moser KM, LeMoine JR. Is embolic risk conditioned by location of deep venous thrombosis? Ann Intern Med 1981; 94:439-444.
13. Cogo A, Lensing AW, Koopman MM, et al. Compression ultrasonography for diagnostic management of patients with clinically suspected deep vein thrombosis: prospective cohort study. BMJ 1998; 316:17-20.
14. Birdwell BG, Raskob GE, Whitsett TL, et al. The clinical validity of normal compression ultrasonography in outpatients suspected of having deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 1998; 128:1-7.
15. Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Douketis J, et al. A randomized trial of diagnostic strategies after normal proximal vein ultrasonography for suspected deep venous thrombosis: D-dimer testing compared with repeated ultrasonography. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142:490-496. A randomized controlled trial confirming the safety of withholding anticoagulation in patients with a negative D-dimer and an initial normal compression ultrasound.
16. Schellong SM. Complete compression ultrasound for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2004; 10:350-355. A comprehensive overview of the role of extended compression ultrasonography in diagnosis of DVT.
17. Schellong SM, Schwarz T, Halbritter K, et al. Complete compression ultrasonography of the leg veins as a single test for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. Thromb Haemost 2003; 89:228-234.
18. Elias A, Mallard L, Elias M, et al. A single complete ultrasound investigation of the venous network for the diagnostic management of patients with a clinically suspected first episode of deep venous thrombosis of the lower limbs. Thromb Haemost 2003; 89:221-227.
19. Stevens SM, Elliott CG, Chan KJ, et al. Withholding anticoagulation after a negative result on duplex ultrasonography for suspected symptomatic deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140:985-991. A methodologically sound prospective trial demonstrating a low rate of DVT following a negative comprehensive compression ultrasound.
20. El Kheir D, Buller H. One-time comprehensive ultrasonography to diagnose deep venous thrombosis: is that the solution? Ann Intern Med 2004; 140:1052-1053. A well written editorial, highlighting the potential for overtreatment associated with a comprehensive ultrasound protocol.
21. Bounameaux H, Righini M, Perrier A. Diagnosing deep vein thrombosis: the case for compression ultrasonography limited to the proximal veins. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2:2260-2261.
22. Elias A, Cadene A, Elias M, et al. Extended lower limb venous ultrasound for the diagnosis of proximal and distal vein thrombosis in asymptomatic patients after total hip replacement. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2004; 27:438-444. An accuracy study of extended compression ultrasonography in comparison with venography for asymptomatic DVT.
23. Kelly J, Hunt BJ. The utility of pretest probability assessment in patients with clinically suspected venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Haemost 2003; 1:1888-1896.
24. Wells PS, Hirsh J, Anderson DR, et al. A simple clinical model for the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis combined with impedance plethysmography: potential for an improvement in the diagnostic process. J Intern Med 1998; 243:15-23.
25. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Bormanis J, et al. Value of assessment of pretest probability of deep-vein thrombosis in clinical management. Lancet 1997; 350:1795-1798.
26. Goodacre S, Sutton AJ, Sampson FC. Meta-analysis: the value of clinical assessment in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med 2005; 143:129-139. An excellent meta-analysis clarifying the role of clinical assessment in diagnosis of DVT.
27. Tamariz LJ, Eng J, Segal JB, et al. Usefulness of clinical prediction rules for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review. Am J Med 2004; 117:676-684. A well performed meta-analysis of the utility of clinical prediction rules for DVT.
28. Oudega R, Hoes AW, Moons KG. The Wells rule does not adequately rule out deep venous thrombosis in primary care patients. Ann Intern Med 2005; 143:100-107. A sound study demonstrating reduced utility of the Wells rule for excluding DVT in primary care patients.
29. Wells PS, Hirsh J, Anderson DR, et al. Accuracy of clinical assessment of deep-vein thrombosis. Lancet 1995; 345:1326-1330.
30. Douketis JD. Use of a clinical prediction score in patients with suspected deep venous thrombosis: two steps forward, one step back? Ann Intern Med 2005; 143:140-142.
31. Oudega R, Moons KG, Hoes AW. Ruling out deep venous thrombosis in primary care: a simple diagnostic algorithm including D-dimer testing. Thromb Haemost 2005; 94:200-205. An initial description of a new prediction rule for primary care patients, requiring further validation in prospective trials.
32. Kelly J, Rudd A, Lewis RR, Hunt BJ. Plasma D-dimers in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Arch Intern Med 2002; 162:747-756.
33. Stein PD, Hull RD, Patel KC, et al. D-dimer for the exclusion of acute venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2004; 140:589-602. A comprehensive review of the accuracy of different D-dimer tests used for the diagnosis of DVT.
34. Becker DM, Philbrick JT, Bachhuber TL, Humphries JE. D-dimer testing and acute venous thromboembolism: a shortcut to accurate diagnosis? Arch Intern Med 1996; 156:939-946.
35. Fancher TL, White RH, Kravitz RL. Combined use of rapid D-dimer testing and estimation of clinical probability in the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis: systematic review. BMJ 2004; 329:821. An excellent review summarizing the evidence for D-dimer testing in DVT diagnosis.
36. Gardiner C, Pennaneac'h C, Walford C, et al. An evaluation of rapid D-dimer assays for the exclusion of deep vein thrombosis. Br J Haematol 2005; 128:842-848.
37. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med 2003; 349:1227-1235.
38. Schutgens RE, Ha-s FJ, Biesma DH. Reduced efficacy of clinical probability score and D-dimer assay in elderly subjects suspected of having deep vein thrombosis. Br J Haematol 2005; 129:653-657. A well performed study highlighting the reduced specificity of D-dimer testing in older patients.
39. Linkins LA, Bates SM, Ginsberg JS, Kearon C. Use of different D-dimer levels to exclude venous thromboembolism depending on clinical pretest probability. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2:1256-1260. A retrospective trial examining the potential for increasing specificity of D-dimer testing.
40. Linkins LA, Pasquale P, Paterson S, Kearon C. Change in thrombus length on venous ultrasound and recurrent deep vein thrombosis. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164:1793-1796. An interesting trial examining the difficulties in using ultrasound in diagnosing recurrent DVT.
41. Rathbun SW, Whitsett TL, Raskob GE. Negative D-dimer result to exclude recurrent deep venous thrombosis: a management trial. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141:839-845. A sound prospective trial providing initial evidence on the role of D-dimer in excluding recurrent DVT.
42. Hull RD, Hirsh J, Carter CJ, et al. Diagnostic value of ventilation-perfusion lung scanning in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Chest 1985; 88:819-828.
43. Hull RD, Raskob GE, Coates G, Panju A. Clinical validity of a normal perfusion lung scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Chest 1990; 97:23-26.
44. The PIOPED Investigators. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism: results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). The PIOPED Investigators. JAMA 1990; 263:2753-2759.
45. Ten Wolde M, Hagen PJ, Macgillavry MR, et al. Non-invasive diagnostic work-up of patients with clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: results of a management study. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2:1110-1117.
46. Schoepf UJ, Goldhaber SZ, Costello P. Spiral computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 2004; 109:2160-2167. An overview of the potential role of CT for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
47. Kamphuisen PW, Agnelli G. Spiral computed tomography is the first-line chest-imaging test for acute pulmonary embolism: no. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 3:11-13.
48. Schoepf UJ, Costello P. Spiral computed tomography is the first-line chest-imaging test for acute pulmonary embolism: yes. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 3:7-10.
49. Le Gal G, Testuz A, Righini M, et al. Reproduction of chest pain by palpation: diagnostic accuracy in suspected pulmonary embolism. BMJ 2005; 330: 452-453. A surprising study highlighting the lack of discriminatory ability of reproduction of chest pain by palpation in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
50. Chunilal SD, Eikelboom JW, Attia J, et al. Does this patient have pulmonary embolism? JAMA 2003; 290:2849-2858.
51. Righini M, Bounameaux H. External validation and comparison of recently described prediction rules for suspected pulmonary embolism. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2004; 10:345-349. A comprehensive overview of clinical prediction rules for pulmonary embolism.
52. Leclercq MG, Kruip MJ, Mac Gillavry MR, et al. Observer variability in the assessment of clinical probability in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2:1204-1206.
53. Wolf SJ, McCubbin TR, Feldhaus KM, et al. Prospective validation of Wells Criteria in the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Emerg Med 2004; 44:503-510.
54. Righini M, Le Gal G, Perrier A, Bounameaux H. Effect of age on the assessment of clinical probability of pulmonary embolism by prediction rules. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2:1206-1208. A retrospective analysis demonstrating the utility of prediction rules in elderly patients with suspected pulmonary embolism.
55. Bernard Bagattini S, Bounameaux H, Perneger T, Perrier A. Suspicion of pulmonary embolism in outpatients: nonspecific chest pain is the most frequent alternative diagnosis. J Intern Med 2004; 256:153-160. An interesting trial examining the final diagnosis in patients who have a suspected diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and in whom it is excluded.
56. Kline JA, Mitchell AM, Kabrhel C, et al. Clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2:1247-1255. An excellent trial attempting to create a prediction rule to identify patients in whom D-dimer testing can be safely withheld.
57. Righini M, Le Gal G, Perrier A, Bounameaux H. More on: clinical criteria to prevent unnecessary diagnostic testing in emergency department patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 3:188-189 (author reply 190-191). An important comment, demonstrating reduced accuracy of the above prediction rule in a population with a higher prevalence of pulmonary embolism.
58. Kearon C. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. CMAJ 2003; 168:183-194.
59. Righini M, Aujesky D, Roy PM, et al. Clinical usefulness of D-dimer depending on clinical probability and cutoff value in outpatients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 2004; 164:2483-2487. An interesting trial examining the use of altering cut-point levels of D-dimer tests in an attempt to increase test specificity.
60. Di Nisio M, Sohne M, Kamphuisen PW, Buller HR. D-dimer test in cancer patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 3:1239-1242. A sound prospective trial looking at the performance of D-dimer in patients with cancer.
61. Bosson JL, Barro C, Satger B, et al. Quantitative high D-dimer value is predictive of pulmonary embolism occurrence independently of clinical score in a well-defined low risk factor population. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 3:93-99.
62. Richman PB, Courtney DM, Friese J, et al. Prevalence and significance of nonthromboembolic findings on chest computed tomography angiography performed to rule out pulmonary embolism: a multicenter study of 1,025 emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med 2004; 11:642-647.
63. Wittram C, Meehan MJ, Halpern EF, et al. Trends in thoracic radiology over a decade at a large academic medical center. J Thorac Imaging 2004; 19:164-170.
64. Mullins MD, Becker DM, Hagspiel KD, Philbrick JT. The role of spiral volumetric computed tomography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 2000; 160:293-298.
65. Rathbun SW, Raskob GE, Whitsett TL. Sensitivity and specificity of helical computed tomography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2000; 132:227-232.
66. Eng J, Krishnan JA, Segal JB, et al. Accuracy of CT in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a systematic literature review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183:1819-1827. A thorough updated review of the accuracy of CT in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
67. Van Strijen MJ, De Monye W, Kieft GJ, et al. Accuracy of single-detector spiral CT in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicenter cohort study of consecutive patients with abnormal perfusion scintigraphy. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 3:17-25. An excellent prospective accuracy study of single-detector CT in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
68. Moores LK, Jackson WL Jr. Shorr AF, Jackson JL. Meta-analysis: outcomes in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism managed with computed tomographic pulmonary angiography. Ann Intern Med 2004; 141:866-874. A thorough overview of clinical outcome in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and a negative CT scan.
69. Quiroz R, Kucher N, Zou KH, et al. Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. JAMA 2005; 293:2012-2017. A systematic review of clinical outcome in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism and a negative CT scan.
70. Frost SD. Defining the role of computed tomographic pulmonary angiography in suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142:800-801 (author reply 802).
71. Kamphuisen PW, Agnelli G. Defining the role of computed tomographic pulmonary angiography in suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 2005; 142:801-802 (author reply 802).
72. Elias A, Cazanave A, Elias M, et al. Diagnostic management of pulmonary embolism using clinical assessment, plasma D-dimer assay, complete lower limb venous ultrasound and helical computed tomography of pulmonary arteries: a multicentre clinical outcome study. Thromb Haemost 2005; 93:982-988. A well performed prospective trial confirming the safety of a protocol of CT combined with ultrasound for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
73. van Strijen MJ, de Monye W, Schiereck J, et al. Single-detector helical computed tomography as the primary diagnostic test in suspected pulmonary embolism: a multicenter clinical management study of 510 patients. Ann Intern Med 2003; 138:307-314.
74. Musset D, Parent F, Meyer G, et al. Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study. Lancet 2002; 360:1914-1920.
75. Perrier A, Roy PM, Aujesky D, et al. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in outpatients with clinical assessment, D-dimer measurement, venous ultrasound, and helical computed tomography: a multicenter management study. Am J Med 2004; 116:291-299.
76. Perrier A, Roy PM, Sanchez O, et al. Multidetector-row computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:1760-1768. An important study providing initial evidence on the tolerability of multi-detector CT in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
77. Ghanima W, Alma-s V, Aballi S, et al. Management of suspected pulmonary embolism (PE) by D-dimer and multi-slice computed tomography in outpatients: an outcome study. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 3:1926-1932. An important initial true management study examining the safety of multi-detector CT as a stand-alone test for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
78. Doyle NM, Ramirez MM, Mastrobattista JM, et al. Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 191:1019-1023.
79. Nijkeuter M, Geleijns J, De Roos A, et al. Diagnosing pulmonary embolism in pregnancy: rationalizing fetal radiation exposure in radiological procedures. J Thromb Haemost 2004; 2:1857-1858.
80. Morris TA, Marsh JJ, Chiles PG, et al. Single photon emission computed tomography of pulmonary emboli and venous thrombi using anti-D-dimer. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004; 169:987-993. An interesting animal study presenting initial evidence on the role of radiolabelled D-dimer antibodies in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.
81. Blum A, Bellou A, Guillemin F, et al. Performance of magnetic resonance angiography in suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost 2005; 93:503-511. A prospective study highlighting concerns over the role of MRA in diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.