Systematic evaluation methodology for cell phone user interfaces

Interacting with Computers

Volumn 18, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 304-325

  Lee, Young Seok ^a   Hong, Sang W ^b   Smith Jackson, Tonya L ^a   Nussbaum, Maury A ^a   Tomioka, Kei ^c  

^a Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University   (United States)

^b Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)   (South Korea)

^c TOSHIBA CORPORATION   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cell phone; Mobile phone; Usability evaluation; User interface design

Indexed keywords

CELLULAR RADIO SYSTEMS; DATA REDUCTION; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; PROBLEM SOLVING;

CELL PHONE; MOBILE PHONE; USABILITY EVALUATION; USER INTERFACE DESIGN;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 33144460976     PISSN: 09535438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.intcom.2005.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. T.S. Andre, H.R. Hartson, S.M. Belz, and F.A. McCreary The user action framework: a reliable foundation for usability engineering support tools International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 54 1 2001 107 136
2. J.P. Chin, V.A. Diehl, and K.L. Norman Development of an instrument measuring user satisfaction of the human-computer interface Proceedings of ACM CHI'88 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 88 1988 pp. 213-218
3. B. Christie, and M.M. Gardiner Evaluation of the Human-Computer Interface 1990 Taylor & Francis New York
4. G. Cockton, D. Lavery, and A. Woolrych Inspection-based evaluations J.A. Jacko A. Sears The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications 2003 Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates Mahwah, NJ 1118 1138
5. F.D. Davis Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology MIS Quarterly 13 3 1989 319 340
6. J.S. Dumas User-based evaluations J. Jacko A. Sears The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies And Emerging Applications 2002 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc Mahwah, NJ 1093 1117
7. J.S. Dumas, and J.C. Redish A Practical Guide to Usability Testing 1999 Intellect Portland, OR
8. K.A. Ericsson, and H.A. Simon Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data 1993 The MIT Press Cambridge, MA
9. W.D. Gray, and M.C. Salzman Damaged merchandise? A review of experiments that compare usability evaluation methods Human-Computer Interaction 13 1998 203 262
10. H.R. Hartson, T.S. Andre, and R.C. Williges Criteria for evaluating usability methods International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 13 4 2003 373 410
11. M. Hertzum, and N.E. Jacobsen The evaluator effect: a chilling fact about usability evaluation methods International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 15 1 2003 183 204
12. D. Hix, and H.R. Hartson Developing User Interfaces: Ensuring Usability through Product and Process 1993 Wiley New York, NY
13. ISO/IEC. 9241-11, 1998. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDT)s - Part II Guidance on Usability, ISO/IEC 9241-II: 1998 (E).
14. J. Karat Software evaluation methodologies M. Helander Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction 1988 Elsevier Science Publishers North-Holland 891 903
15. J. Kirakowski, and M. Corbett SUMI: the software usability measurement inventory British Journal of Educational Technology 24 3 1993 210 212
16. H. Kuusela, and P. Pallab A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal protocol analysis American Journal of Psychology 113 3 2000 387 404
17. Y.S. Lee, T.L. Smith-Jackson, M.A. Nussbaum, K. Tomioka, and Y. Bhatkhande Use of product-interactive focus groups for requirement capture and usability assessment Proceedings of the 48th Annual Human Factors and Ergonomics Conference. New orleans, LA 2004 pp. 2461-2465
18. Lee, Y.S., Ryu, Y.S., Smith-Jackson, T.L., Shin, D.J., Nussbaum, M.A., Tomioka, K., Usability Testing with Cultural Groups in Developing a Cell Phone Navigation System. To appear: Proceedings of HCII 2005 (in press).
19. J.R. Lewis IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 7 1 1995 57 78
20. G. Lindgaard Are the notions of thoroughness, efficiency and validity valid in HCI practice? Publication of the Human Oriented Technology Lab Carleton University vol. 4 2004
21. C. Lindholm, and T. Keinonen Mobile Usability: How Nokia Changed the Face of the Mobile Phone 2003 McGraw-Hill Professional New York, NY
22. A. Marcus Metaphor design in user interfaces Journal of Computer Documentation 22 2 1998 43 57
23. J. Nielsen Usability Engineering 1993 Academic San Diego, CA
24. M.B. Rosson, and J.M. Carroll Usability Engineering: Scenario-based Development of Human Computer Interaction 2002 Morgan Kaufmann San Francisco
25. A. Sears Testing and evaluation J. Jacko A. Sears The Human-computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications 2002 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Mahwah, NJ 1091 1092
26. B. Shneiderman, and C. Plaisant Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction 2004 Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. Boston, MA
27. M. Sweeney, M. Maguire, and B. Shackel Evaluating user-computer interaction: a framework International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 38 4 1993 689 711
28. M.V. Welie, G.C. Van der Veer, and A. Eliens Patterns as tools for user interface design International Workshop on Tools for Working with Guidelines, October 7-8, 2000 2000 Biarritz France
29. A. Whitefield, F. Wilson, and J. Dowell A framework for human factors evaluation Behaviour & Information Technology 10 1991 65 79
30. M. Ziefle The influence of user expertise and phone complexity on performance, ease of use and learnability of different mobile phones Behaviour & Information Technology 21 5 2002 303 311