Evaluating adult Miranda waiwer competency

Journal of Psychiatry and Law

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 471-489

  Greenfield, Daniel P ^c   Witt, Philip H ^a,b  

^a RUTGERS ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; CRIMINAL LAW; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMAN; HUMAN RIGHTS; INTELLIGENCE; INTERVIEW; MALINGERING; MENTAL CAPACITY; MENTAL HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; OFFENDER; PSYCHIATRIST; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST; PSYCHOLOGIST;

EID: 33144455176     PISSN: 00931853     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/009318530503300402     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420 (1984).
2. Borum, R. (2003). Not guilty by reason of insanity (Chapter 6). In Thomas Grisso, Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments (2nd Edition). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
3. DeClue, G. (2005). Interrogations and confessions: A manual for practice. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
4. Frederick, R. I. (1997). Validity Index Profile manual. Minnesota, MN: National Computer Systems.
5. Greenfield, D.P., Dougherty, E.J., Jackson, R.M., Podboy, J.W., and Zimmerman, M.L. (2001). Retrospective evaluation of Miranda reading levels and waiver competency," American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 19, 75-86.
6. Greenfield, D.P., Dougherty, E.J., Jackson, R.M., Podboy, J.W., and Zimmerman, M.L. (2000). A checklist for evaluating Miranda waiver competency, American Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 21: 57-71.
7. Grisso, T. (1998). Assessing understanding and appreciation of Miranda rights: Manual and materials. Sarasota, FL: Professional Resource Press.
8. Grisso, T. (2003). Evaluating competencies: Forensic assessments and instruments (2nd Edition). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1984). A new scale of interrogative suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 5, 303-314.
10. Gudjonsson, G. H. (1987). A parallel form of the Gudjonsson Suggestibility Scale. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26, 215-221.
11. Gutheil, T.G. and Applebaum, P.S. (2000). Clinical handbook of psychiatry and the law (Third Edition), Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Williams.
12. Martell, D.A. (1996). Causal relation between brain damage and homicide: The prosecution, Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatiatry, 1, 184-194.
13. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).
14. Oberlander, L. B., Goldstein, N. E. & Goldstein, A. M. (2003). Competence to confess. In Alan M. Goldstein (ed.) Handbook of psychology, Volume 11: Forensic psychology (pp. 335-357), Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
15. People v. Bernasco, 562 N.E.2d 958 (Ill. 1990).
16. Reck v. Pate, 367 U.S. 433 (1961).
17. Slovenko, R. (2001). Commentary: Holding the expert accountable," Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 29, 543-574.
18. Stone, A. A. (1984). The ethics of forensic psychiatry: A view from the ivory tower" (pages 57-75), Stone, A.A. (Ed.). Law psychiatry, and morality: Essays and analysis. Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatry Press, Inc.