메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 543-574

Holding the expert accountable

(1)  Slovenko, Ralph a  

a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUTOPSY; COMPETENCE; CUSTODY; EXPERT WITNESS; FORENSIC PSYCHIATRY; HUMAN; INSURANCE; LAW; LEGAL ASPECT; LEGAL LIABILITY; LICENSING; MALPRACTICE; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MENTAL HEALTH; NOTE; PSYCHIATRIST; PSYCHOLOGIC TEST;

EID: 0035560921     PISSN: 00931853     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/009318530102900413     Document Type: Note
Times cited : (3)

References (71)
  • 1
    • 85037019080 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • United States v. Ramirez, 871 F.2d 582 at 585 (6th Cir. 1989)
  • 2
    • 0001458169 scopus 로고
    • The case against expert witnesses
    • Sept. 25
    • (1989) Fortune , pp. 135
    • Olson, W.1
  • 3
    • 85037009073 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In re Air Crash Disaster at New Orleans, Louisiana, 795 F.2d 1230 at 1234 (5th Cir.1986)
  • 4
    • 85037019374 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rules 701-705, Federal Rules of Evidence
  • 5
    • 85037020669 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
  • 9
    • 85037022443 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 509 U.S. 579 (1993)
  • 10
    • 85037010784 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
  • 11
    • 85037010801 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Harris v. Riggenbach, 633 N.W.2d 193 (S.D. 2000)
  • 12
    • 85037012598 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Calkins v. Sumner, 13 Wis. 193 (1860)
  • 13
    • 85037020551 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The U.S. Supreme Court spelled out these reasons in Briscoe v. LaHue 460 U.S. 325 (1983)
  • 14
    • 85037010472 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See, e.g., Cal. Code of Civil Procedure, Sec. 47 (b)(2)
  • 16
    • 0006078435 scopus 로고
    • Absolute privilege and California civil code section 47(2): A need for consistency
    • (1982) Pacific L.J. , vol.14 , pp. 105
    • Smith, S.M.1
  • 17
    • 85037024416 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Silberg v. Anderson, 50 Cal.3d 205, 786 P.2d 365, 266 Cal. Rptr. 638 (1990)
  • 18
    • 85037021489 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 249 Ill. App. 3d 5, 618 N.E.2d 794 (Ill. App. 1993)
  • 19
    • 85037009785 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 2 Cal. App. 4th 88, 3 Cal. Rptr. 2d 27 (1991)
  • 20
    • 85037009576 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See also Kennedy v. Cannon, 229 Md. 92, 192 A.2d 54 (1962)
  • 22
    • 0005865263 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Irresponsible testimony by medical experts in cases involving the physical abuse and neglect of children
    • quoted in Report of the Board of Trustees of the American Medical Association, Report 5-A-98
    • (1997) Child Maltreatment , vol.2 , pp. 313
    • Chadwick, D.L.1    Krous, H.F.2
  • 23
    • 85037015783 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
  • 24
    • 85037014600 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 673 F.Supp. 210 (E.D. Mich. 1987)
  • 25
    • 85037018147 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Lewis v. Swenson, 126 Ariz. 562, 617 P.2d 69 (Ariz. App. 1980)
  • 26
    • 85037014835 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 673 F. Supp. at 212, citing Collins v. Walden, 613 F. Supp. 1306 (N.D. Ga. 1985)
  • 27
    • 85037018529 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 412 Mich. 1, 312 N.W. 2d 585 (1981)
  • 28
    • 85037019959 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Tool Research & Engineering Corp. v. Henigson, 45 Cal. App. 3d 675, 120 Cal. Rptr. 291 (1975)
  • 29
    • 85037020974 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 500 U.S. 478 (1991)
  • 32
    • 85037008217 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Tex. Rev. Civ. Stat. Ann. art. 5547-5518
  • 33
    • 85037014221 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 637 S.W.2d 914 (Tex. 1982)
  • 34
    • 85037010812 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 637 S.W.2d at 917
  • 35
    • 85037007709 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Littleton v. Good Samaritan Hosp., 39 Ohio St. 3d 86, 529 N.E.2d 449 (1988). It is to be noted that the professional-judgment rule applies only where the decision taken has been preceded by a "careful examination." 529 N.E.2d 529 N.E.2d at 457
  • 36
    • 85037010972 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 529 N.E.2d at 458
  • 38
    • 85037022297 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Id
  • 41
    • 85037017376 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 776 P.2d 666 (Wash. 1989)
  • 42
    • 0006077676 scopus 로고
    • When 'hired guns' backfire: The witness immunity doctrine and the negligent expert witness
    • (1993) UMKC L. Rev. , vol.62 , pp. 185
    • Jensen, E.G.1
  • 44
    • 0006074015 scopus 로고
    • Absolute immunity for the negligent expert witness
    • Bruce v. Byrne-Stevens
    • (1990) Willamette L. Rev. , vol.26 , pp. 1051
    • Pahl, D.1
  • 46
    • 85037013452 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
  • 47
    • 85037024620 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 2000 U.S. Dist. Lexis 8525; on appeal, 248 F.3d 382 (5th Cir. 2001); referred to Louisiana Supreme Court, 794 So.2d 778 (La. 2001)
  • 48
    • 0001084478 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Experts are liable, too: Client suits against 'friendly experts' multiplying, succeeding
    • Nov.
    • (2000) ABAJ , vol.86 , pp. 17
    • Hansen, M.1
  • 49
    • 85037018434 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 841 S.W.2d 671 (Mo. 1992)
  • 50
    • 85037007787 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • note
  • 51
    • 85037020597 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Mattco Forge Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co., 5 Cal. App. 4th 392, 6 Cal. Rptr. 2d 781 (1992)
  • 52
    • 85037020342 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 47 Conn. Supp. 179, 781 A.2d 518 (Conn. 2000)
  • 53
    • 85037008268 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Mangrum v. Roy, Wayne County Circuit (Michigan), No. 82- 217856-NO
  • 54
    • 85037017258 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 607. Still, a party may not call a witness primarily to impeach. The courts have imposed a requirement comparable to "surprise": "good faith." See, e.g., United States v. Gomez-Gallardo, 915 F.2d 553 (9th Cir. 1990); United States v. Hogan, 763 F.2d 697 (5th Cir. 1985); United States v. Webster, 734 F.2d 1191 7th Cir. 1984; United States v. DeLillo, 620 F.2d 939 (2d Cir. 1980); Whithurst v. Wright, 592 F.2d 834 (5th Cir. 1979)
  • 57
    • 85037021298 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See Federal Rules of Evidence, Rules 607-610, and counterparts in the various state rules of evidence
  • 58
    • 85037006830 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • United States v. Abel, 469 U.S. 45 (1984)
  • 59
    • 85037016779 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 803(18)
  • 60
    • 85037016936 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 449 Mich. 469, 536 N.W. 2d 760 (1995)
  • 61
    • 85037025307 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 203 Mich. App. 361, 512 N.W. 2d 82 (1994)
  • 62
    • 85037014459 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Personal communications
  • 63
    • 85037009480 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Board of Trustees Report 5-A-98
  • 66
    • 85037017560 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Lavit v. Superior Court, 839 P.2d 1141 (Ariz. App. 1992)
  • 67
    • 85037012856 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Levine v. Wiss & Co., 478 A.2d 397 400 (N.J. 1984)
  • 68
    • 85037015212 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 253 F.3d 967 (7th Cir. 2001)
  • 69
    • 85037017635 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 253 F.3d at 975. See also Mississippi State Board of Psychological Examiners v. Hosford, 508 So.2d 1049 (Miss. 1987) (withdrawal of license for breach of confidentiality)
  • 70
    • 85037012917 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Personal communications
  • 71
    • 85037020009 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999); State v. Myers, 359 N.W.2d 604 (Minn. 1984)


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.