Illuminating reform evaluation studies through incorporating teacher effectiveness research: A case study in mathematics

School Effectiveness and School Improvement

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 3-32

  Kyriakides, L ^a   Charalambous, C ^a   Philippou, G ^a   Campbell, R J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS   (Cyprus)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 32944477636     PISSN: 09243453     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09243450500404293     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Amit, M., & Fried, M. N. (2002). Research, reform, and times of change. In L. D. English (Ed.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 355-381). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Atkin, J. M. (1998). The OECD study of innovations in science, mathematics and technology education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 30(6), 647-660.
3. Berends, M. (2000). Teacher-reported effects of new American school designs: Exploring relationships to teacher background and school context. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(1), 65-82.
4. Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. (1986). Teacher behaviour and student achievement. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 328-375). New York: Macmillan.
5. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. Calderhead, J. (Ed.). (1987). Exploring teachers thinking. London: Cassell.
7. Campbell, R. J. (1985). Developing the primary school curriculum. London: Cassell.
8. Charalambous, C. (2003). A model for solving problems based on schema theory: Examining three aspects of the implementation of a mathematics reform introduced in Cypriot primary schools. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
9. Charalambous, C., Kyriakides, L., & Philippou, G. (2003). Testing a comprehensive model for measuring problem solving and problem posing skills of primary pupil. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceeding of the 2003 Joint Meeting of PME and PMENA, 2 (pp. 205-212). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii.
10. Charalambous, C., Philippou, G., & Kyriakides, L. (2004). Towards a unified model on teachers' concerns and efficacy beliefs related to a mathematics reform. In M. J. Hoines & A. B. Fuglestad (Eds.), Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2 (pp. 199-206). Bergen, Norway: Bergen University College.
11. Chen, H. (1990). Theory-driven evaluations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
12. Crawford, A. R., Chamblee, G. E., & Rowlett, R. J. (1998). Assessing concerns of algebra teachers during a curriculum reform: A constructivist approach. Journal of In-service Education, 24(2), 317-327.
13. Creemers, B. P. M. (1994). The effective classroom. London: Cassell.
14. Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (3rd ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
15. Datnow, A., Borman, G., & Stringfield, S. (2000). School reform through a highly specified curriculum: Implementation and effects of the core knowledge sequence. The Elementary School Journal, 101(2), 167-191.
16. Datnow, A., Borman, G., Stringfield, S., Overman, L. T., & Castellano, M. (2003). Comprehensive school reform in culturally and linguistically diverse contexts: Implementation and outcomes from a four-year study. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 143-170.
17. Datnow, A., Hubbard, L., & Mehan, H. (2002). Extending educational reform: From one school to many. New York: RoutledgeFalmer Press.
18. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19. Duke, D. (2004). The challenges of educational change. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
20. Ellett, C. D., & Teddlie, C. (2003). Teacher evaluation, teacher effectiveness and school effectiveness: Perspectives from the USA. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17(1), 101-128.
21. Evers, W. J. G., Brouwers, A., & Tomic, W. (2002). Burnout and self-efficacy: A study on teachers' beliefs when implementing an innovative educational system in Netherlands. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72, 227-243.
22. Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1996). Monitoring education: Indicators, quality and effectiveness. London: Cassell-Continuum.
23. Fullan, G. M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Cassell.
24. Ghaith, G., & Shaaban, K. (1999). The relationship between perceptions of teaching concerns, teacher efficacy, and selected teacher characteristics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 487-496.
25. Ghaith, G., & Yaghi, H. (1997). Relationships among experience, teacher efficacy, and attitudes towards the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(4), 451-458.
26. Goldstein, H. (2003). Multilevel statistical models (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
27. Hextall, I., & Mahony, P. (1998). Effective teachers effective schools. London: Biddles.
28. Karagiorgis, A. G. (1986). Education development in Cyprus 1960-1977. Nicosia, Cyprus: Theo Press.
29. Kelly, A. V. (1989). The curriculum: Theory and practice. London: Paul Chapman.
30. Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.
31. Kyriakides, L. (1997). Primary teachers' perceptions of policy for curriculum reform in Mathematics. Educational Research and Evaluation, 3, 214-242.
32. Kyriakides, L. (1999). The management of curriculum improvement in Cyprus: A critique of a "centre-periphery" model in a centralised system. In T. Townsend, P. Clarke, & M. Ainscow (Eds.), Third millennium schools: A world of difference in effectiveness and improvement (pp. 107-124). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
33. Kyriakides, L. (2002). A research-based model for the development of policy on baseline assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 28(6), 805-826.
34. Kyriakides, & Campbell, R. J. (2003). Teacher evaluation in Cyprus: Some conceptual and methodological issues arising from teacher and school effectiveness research. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17(1), 21-40.
35. Kyriakides, L., & Campbell, R. J. (2004). School self-evaluation and school improvement: A critique of values and procedures. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 30(1), 23-36.
36. Kyriakides, L., Campbell, R. J., & Christofidou, E. (2002). Generating criteria for measuring teacher effectiveness through a self-evaluation approach: A complementary way of measuring teacher effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 13, 291-325.
37. Kyriakides, L., Campbell, R. J., & Gagatsis, A. (2000). The significance of classroom effect in primary schools: An application of Creemers' Comprehensive Model of Educational Effectiveness. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 501-529.
38. Lee, J. C. K., Lam, W. R., & Li, Y. Y. (2003). Teacher evaluation and effectiveness in Hong Kong: Issues and challenges. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17(1), 41-65.
39. Levenberg, I., & Sfard, A. (1996). When change becomes the name of the game: Mathematics teachers in transition to a new learning environment. In L. Puig & A. Gutierrez (Eds.), Proceedings of the 20th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 249-256). Valencia, Spain: University of Valencia.
40. Lincoln, Y. S., & Cuba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
41. Lindsay, G., & Desforges, M. (1998). Baseline assessment: Practice, problems and possibilities. London: David Fulton.
42. Lloyd, G. M., & Wilson, M. (1998). Supporting innovation: The impact of a teacher's conceptions of functions on his implementation of a reform curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(3), 248-274.
43. MacBeath, J. (1999). Schools must speak for themselves: The case for school self-evaluation. London: Routledge.
44. MacDonald, B. (1991). Critical ntroduction from innovation to reform - A framework for analysing change. In J. Rudduck (Ed.), Innovation and change: Developing involvement and understanding (pp. 1-13). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
45. Marshall, S. P. (1995). Schemas in problem solving. New York: Cambridge University Press.
46. Miller, S. (1984). Experimental design and statistics (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
47. Milner, H. R., & Woolfolk-Hoy, A. (2003). A case study of an African American teacher's self-efficacy, stereotype threat and persistence. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 263-276.
48. Muijs, D., & Reynolds, D. (2000). School effectiveness and teacher effectiveness in mathematics: Some preliminary findings from the evaluation of the mathematics enhancement programme (Primary). School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11, 273-303.
49. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
50. Oser, F. K., Dick, A., & Patry, J. L. (1992). Effective and responsible teaching. New York: Macmillan.
51. Pajares, F. (1999). Current directions in self-efficacy research. In M. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 1-49). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
52. Pajares, F., & Miller, M. (1994). Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(2), 193-203.
53. Philippou, G., & Christou, C. (1999). A schema-based model for teaching problem solving. In O. Zaslavsky (Ed.), Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 57-64). Haifa: Israel Institute of Technology.
54. Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470.
55. Plewis, I. (2000). Evaluating educational interventions using multilevel growth curves: The case of reading recovery. Educational Research and Evaluation, 6, 83-101.
56. Pollard, A., Broadfoot, P., Croll, P., Osborn, M., & Abbott, D. (1994). Changing English primary schools? The impact of the Education Reform Act at Key Stage 1. London: Cassell.
57. Polettini, A. F. F. (2000). Mathematics teaching life histories in the study of teachers' perceptions of change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 765-783.
58. Ponte, J. P., Matos J. F., Guimaraes, H. M., Leal, L. C., & Canavarro, A. P. (1994). Teachers' and students' views and attitudes towards a new mathematics curriculum: A case study. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26, 347-365.
59. Popham, W. J. (1993). Educational evaluation (3rd ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
60. Rasbash, J., Browne, W., Goldstein, H., Yang, M., Plewis, I., Healy, M., Woodhouse, G., Draper, D., Langford, I., & Lewis, T. (2002). A users'guide to MLwiN. London: University of London, Institute of Education.
61. Rasch, G. (1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
62. Reynolds, D., Muijs, D., & Treharne, F. D. (2003). Teacher evaluation and teacher effectiveness in the United Kingdom. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 17(1), 83-100.
63. Robson, C. (1993). Real world research. Oxford: Blackwell.
64. Scheerens, J., & Bosker, R. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. Oxford: Pergamon.
65. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem-solving, metacognition and sense making in mathematics. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334-368). New York: Macmillan.
66. Schon, D. A. (1971). Beyond the stable state. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
67. Scriven, M. (1991). Evaluation thesaurus (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
68. Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
69. Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1996). Changing schools. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
70. Sztajn, P. (2003). Adapting reform ideas in different mathematics classrooms: Beliefs beyond mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 6, 53-75.
71. Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk-Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of educational Research, 68(2), 202-248.
72. Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward Utopia; A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
73. Van den Berg, R., & Ros, A. (1999). The permanent importance of the subjective reality of teachers during educational innovation: A concerns-based approach. American Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 879-906.
74. Van den Berg, R., Sleegers, P., Geijsel, F., & Vandenberghe, R. (2000). Implementation of an innovation: Meeting the concerns of teachers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 26(4), 331-350.
75. Woods, P. (1994). Adaptation and self-determination in English primary schools. Oxford Review of Education, 20(4), 387-410.
76. Worthen, B. R., Sanders, J. R., & Fitzpatrick, J. L. (1997). Program evaluation; Alternative approaches and practical guidelines (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.