Perspective-based reading: A replicated experiment focused on individual reviewer effectiveness

Empirical Software Engineering

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 119-142

  Maldonado, José C ^a,h,i,j   Carver, Jeffrey ^b   Shull, Forrest ^c   Fabbri, Sandra ^d   Dória, Emerson ^e,k   Martimiano, Luciana ^a   Mendonça, Manoel ^f,l   Basili, Victor ^g,m,n  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Fraunhofer USA Inc   (United States)

^d FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO CARLOS   (Brazil)

^e UNIVERSIDADE DO OESTE PAULISTA UNOESTE   (Brazil)

^f Universidade Salvador   (Brazil)

^g UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^h SBC (The Brazilian Computer Society)   (Brazil)

ⁱ ACM   (Brazil)

^j IEEE   (Brazil)

^k Brazilian Computer Society   (Brazil)

^l Federal University of São Carlos ^*  (Brazil)

^m Institute of Advanced Computer Science   (United States)

ⁿ NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Experimental replication; Laboratory package; Requirements documents; Software inspections; Software reading techniques

Indexed keywords

EXPERIMENTAL REPLICATION; LABORATORY PACKAGE; SOFTWARE INSPECTIONS;

COMPUTER SCIENCE;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 32944471489     PISSN: 13823256     EISSN: 15737616     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10664-006-5967-6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Basili V, Green S, Laitenberger O, Shull F, Sorumgaard S, Zelkowitz M (1996) The empirical investigation of perspective based reading. Empir Softw Eng-Int J. 1:133-164
2. Ciolkowski M, Differding C, Laitenberger O, Munch J (1997) Empirical investigation of perspective-based reading: a replicated experiment. ISERN 97-13
3. Conradi R, Mahagheghi P, Arif T, Hegde LC, Bunde GA, Pedersen A (2003) Object-oriented reading techniques for inspection of uml models - an industrial experiment. Proc of Eur Conf on Object Oriented Program (ECOOP'03). Darmstadt, Germany, pp. 483-500
4. Laitenberger O, Atkinson C, Schlich M, El Emam K (2000) An experimental comparison of reading techniques for defect detection in uml design documents. J Syst Softw 53: 183-204
5. Laitenberger O, El Emam K, Harbich TG (2001) An internally replicated quasi-experimental comparison of checklist and perspective based reading of code documents. IEEE Trans. Softw Eng 27:387-421
6. Mendonca M, Sunderhaft NL (1999) A state of the Art Report: Mining Software Engineering Data. Department of Defense (DoD) Data & Analysis Center for Software Engineering Data
7. Porter A, Votta L (1998) Comparing detection methods for software requirements inspections: a replication using professional subjects. Empir Softw Eng-Int J 3:355-379
8. Regnell B, Runeson P, Thelin T (2000) Are the perspectives really different? Further experimentation on scenario-based reading of requirements. Empir Softw Eng 5:331-356
9. Robson C (2002) Real World Research. Blackwell Publishing, Malden: MA
10. Shull F (1998) Developing Techniques for Using Software Documents: A Series of Empirical Studies. Ph.D. Thesis. Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park
11. Shull F, Basili V, Boehm B, Brown, AW, Costa P, Lindvall M, Port D, Rus I, Tesoriero R, Zelkowitz M (2002a). What we have learned about fighting defects. Proc IEEE Symp on Softw Metr 249-258
12. Shull F, Basili V, Carver J, Maldonado J, Travassos G, Mendonca M, Fabbri S (2002b) Replicating Software Engineering Experiments: Addressing the Tacit Knowledge Problem. Proc of Int Symp Empir Softw Eng (ISESE'02). Nara, Japan, pp. 7-16
13. Zhang Z, Basili V, Shneiderman B (1999) Perspective-based usability inspection: an empirical validation of efficacy. Empirical Software Engineering - An International Journal 4:43-70