A semiparametric approach to modeling nonlinear relations among latent variables

Structural Equation Modeling

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 513-535

  Bauer, Daniel J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPONENT DISTRIBUTIONS; FINITE MIXTURES; LATENT VARIABLE; LATENT VARIABLE REGRESSION; MODEL-BASED CLUSTER ANALYSIS; NONLINEAR RELATIONS; SEMIPARAMETRIC; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS;

EQUIVALENCE CLASSES;

EID: 32944465536     PISSN: 10705511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15328007sem1204_1     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Arminger, G., & Muthén, B. (1998). A Bayesian approach to nonlinear latent variable models using the Gibbs sampler and the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. Psychometrika, 63, 271-300.
2. Arminger, G., & Stein, P. (1997). Finite mixtures of covariance structure models with regressors. Socio-logical Methods and Research, 26, 148-182.
3. Arminger, G., Stein, P., & Wittenberg, J. (1999). Mixtures of conditional mean- and covariance-structure models. Psychometrika, 64, 475-494.
4. Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2004). The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: Potential problems and promising opportunities. Psychological Methods, 9, 3-29.
5. Bauer, D. J., & Shanahan, M. J. (in press). Modeling complex interactions: Person-centered and variable-centered approaches. In T. D. Little, J. Bovaird, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Modeling ecological and contextual effects in longitudinal studies of human development. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbuam.
6. Blåfield, E. (1980). Clustering of observations from finite mixtures with structural information (Jyvaskyla Studies in Computer Science, Economics & Statistics, No. 2). Jyvaskyla, Finland: Jyvaskyla University Press.
7. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
8. Bollen, K. A. (1995). Structural equation models that are nonlinear in latent variables: A least squares estimator. Sociological Methodology, 25, 223-251.
9. Bollen, K. A., & Paxton, P. (1998). Interactions of latent variables in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 5, 266-293.
10. Dolan, C. V., & van der Maas, H. L. J. (1998). Fitting multivariate normal finite mixtures subject to structural equation modeling. Psychometrika, 63, 227-253.
11. Escobar, M. D., & West, M. (1995). Bayesian density estimation and inference using mixtures. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 577-588.
12. Etezadi-Amoli, J., & McDonald, R. P. (1983). A second generation nonlinear factor analysis. Psychometrika, 48, 315-342.
13. Everitt, B. S., & Hand, D. J. (1981). Finite mixture distributions. London: Chapman & Hall.
14. Ferguson, T. S. (1983). Bayesian density estimation via mixtures of normal distributions. In M. H. Rizvi, J. S. Rustagi, & D. Siegmund (Eds.), Recent advances in statistics (pp. 287-302). New York: Academic.
15. Gibson, W. A. (1959). Three multivariate models: Factor analysis, latent structure analysis, and latent profile analysis. Psychometrika, 24, 229-252.
16. Jedidi, K., Jagpal, H. S., & DeSarbo, W. S. (1997a). Finite-mixture structural equation models for response based segmentation and unobserved heterogeneity. Marketing Science, 16, 39-59.
17. Jedidi, K., Jagpal, H. S., & DeSarbo, W. S. (1997b). STEMM: A general finite mixture structural equation model. Journal of Classification, 14, 23-50.
18. Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Simultaneous factor analysis in several populations. Psychometrika, 36, 409-126.
19. Jöreskog, K. G., & Yang, F. (1996). Non-linear structural equation models: The Kenny-Judd model with interaction effects. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 57-88). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
20. Kaplan, D. (2000). Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1984). Estimating the non-linear and interactive effects of latent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 201-210.
22. Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65, 457-474.
23. Klein, A., & Muthén, B. O. (2003). Quasi maximum likelihood estimation of structural equation models with multiple interaction and quadratic effects. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles.
24. Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford.
25. Lee, S. Y., & Zhu, H. T. (2002). Maximum likelihood estimation of nonlinear structural equation models. Psychometrika, 67, 189-210.
26. McDonald, R. P. (1967). Nonlinear factor analysis (Psychometric Monograph No. 15). Richmond, VA: William Byrd Press.
27. McLachlan, G., & Peel, D. (2000). Finite mixture models. New York: Wiley.
28. Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525-543.
29. Mortimer, J. T. (2003). Working and growing up in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
30. Muthé, B. O. (2001). Second-generation structural equation modeling with a combination of categorical and continuous latent variables: New opportunities for latent class/latent growth modeling. In A. Sayer & L. Collins (Eds.), New methods for the analysis of change (pp. 291-322). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
31. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2001). Mplus user's guide (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Muthén & Muthén.
32. Nagin, D. (1999). Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semi-parametric, group-based approach. Psychological Methods, 4, 139-157.
33. Roeder, K., & Wasserman, L. (1997). Practical Bayesian density estimation using mixtures of normals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92, 894-902.
34. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (1998). Estimating nonlinear effects using a latent moderated structural equations approach. In R. E. Schumacker & G. A. Marcoulides (Eds.), Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling (pp. 203-238). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
35. Schumacker, R. E., & Marcoulides, G. A. (Eds.). (1998). Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
36. Silverman, B. W. (1986). Density estimation for statistics and data analysis. New York: Chapman & Hall.
37. Sörbom, D. (1974). A general method for studying differences in factor means and factor structure between groups. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 27, 229-239.
38. Titterington, D. M., Smith, A. F. M., & Makov, U. E. (1985). Statistical analysis of finite mixture distributions. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
39. Verbeke, G., & Lesaffre, E. (1996). A linear mixed-effects model with heterogeneity in the random-effects population. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 217-221.
40. Wall, M. M., & Amemiya, Y (2000). Esitmation for polynomial structural equations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 929-940.
41. Yung, Y.-F. (1997). Finite mixtures in confirmatory factor-analysis models. Psychometrika, 62, 297-330.
42. Zhu, H.-T.,& Lee, S.-Y. (1999). Statistical analysis of nonlinear factor analysis models. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 52, 225-242.
43. Zhu, H.-T., & Lee, S.-Y. (2001). A Bayesian analysis of finite mixtures in the LISREL model. Psychometrika, 66, 133-152.