Modelling intransitive preferences: A random-effects approach

Journal of Mathematical Psychology

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-14

  Tsai, Rung Ching ^a   Böckenholt, Ulf ^b  

^a NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Intransitivity; Paired comparison data

Indexed keywords

EID: 32944464350     PISSN: 00222496     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmp.2005.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. T.G.G. Bezembinder Circularity and consistency in paired comparisons British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 34 1981 16-29
2. U. Böckenholt Hierarchical modeling of paired comparison data Psychological Methods 6 2001 49-66
3. U. Böckenholt R. Tsai Individual differences in paired comparison data British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 54 2001 265-277
4. P. Bossuyt A comparison of probabilistic unfolding theories for paired comparisons data 1990 Springer New York
5. R.A. Bradley M.E. Terry Rank analysis of incomplete block designs: The method of paired comparisons Biometrika 39 1952 324-345
6. J.D. Carroll G. DeSoete Toward a new paradigm for the study of multiattribute choice behaviour American Psychologist 46 1991 342-352
7. H.A. David The method of paired comparisons 1988 Griffin London
8. E. deDoncker M. Ciobanu A. Genz Parallel computation of multivariate normal probabilities Computing Science and Statistics 31 1999 89-93
9. Fishburn, P. C. (1998). Stochastic utility. In S. Barbera, P. J. Hammond, C. Seidl (Eds.), Handbook of utility theory (Vol. 1, pp. 275-319). Dordrect: Kluwer Academics Publishers.
10. A. Genz Numerical computation of multivariate normal probabilities Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 1 1992 141-150
11. P.E. Gill W. Murray M.H. Wright Practical optimization 1981 Academic Press New York
12. R. González G. Wu On the shape of the probability weighting function Cognitive Psychology 38 1999 129-166
13. C. González-Vallejo Making trade-offs: A probabilistic and context-sensitive model of choice behaviour Psychological Review 109 2002 137-155
14. J.D. Hey C. Orme Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data Econometrica 62 1994 1291-1326
15. G. Iverson J.-C. Falmagne Statistical issues in measurement Mathematical Social Sciences 10 1985 131-153
16. J.M. Linacre The normal cumulative distribution and the logistic ogive Rasch Measurement Transactions 11 2 1997 569
17. H.R. Lindman J. Lyons Stimulus complexity and choice inconsistency among gambles Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 21 1978 141-159
18. G. Loomes R. Sugden Incorporating a stochastic element into decision theories European Economic Review 39 1995 641-648
19. R.D. Luce Individual choice behaviour 1959 Wiley New York
20. R.D. Luce Utility of gains and losses: Measurement-theoretical and experimental approaches 2000 Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Hillsdale
21. A. Maydeu-Olivares Limited information estimation and testing of Thurstonian models for paired comparison data under multiple judgment sampling Psychometrika 66 2001 209-228
22. Maydeu-Olivares, A. (2003). Thurstonian covariance and correlation structures for multiple judgment paired comparisons data. Instituto de Empresa WP 04/03.
23. B.A. Mellers K. Biagini Similarity and choice Psychological Review 101 1994 505-518
24. H. Montgomery A study of intransitive preferences using a think aloud procedure In: J. Jungerman G. de Zeeuw (Eds.), Decision making and change in human affairs 1977 D. Reidel Publishing Dordrecht 347-362
25. H.W. Morrison Testable conditions for triads of paired comparison choices Psychometrika 28 1963 369-390
26. Y. Takane Analysis of covariance structures and probabilistic binary choice data Cognition and Communication 20 1987 45-62
27. L.L. Thurstone A law of comparative judgment Psychological Review 34 1927 273-286
28. R. Tsai Remarks on the identifiability of Thurstonian paired comparison models under multiple judgment Psychometrika 68 2003 361-372
29. R. Tsai U. Böckenholt Two-level linear paired comparison models: Estimation and identifiability issues Mathematical Social Sciences 43 2002 429-449
30. A. Tversky Intransitivity of preference Psychological Review 76 1969 31-48
31. G. Wu R. González Curvature of the probability weighting function Management Science 42 1996 1676-1690