Hierarchical modeling of paired comparison data

Psychological Methods

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 49-64

  Böckenholt, Ulf ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESS; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; GROUP PROCESSES; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; MODELS, STATISTICAL;

EID: 0035289446     PISSN: 1082989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037//1082-989X.6.1.49     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Andersen, E. (1976). Paired comparison with individual differences. Psychometrika, 41, 141-158.
2. Arbuckle, J., & Nugent, J. H. (1973). A general procedure for parameter estimation for the law of comparative judgement. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 26, 240-260.
3. Arrow, K. A. (1951). Social choice and individual values. New York: Wiley.
4. Ben-Akiva, M., & Lerman, S. (1985). Discrete choice analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Bezembinder, T. G. G. (1981). Circularity and consistency in paired comparisons. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 34, 16-29.
6. Bock, R. D. (1958). Remarks on the test of significance for the method of paired comparisons. Psychometrika, 23, 323-334.
7. Bock, R. D., & Jones, L. V. (1968). The measurement and prediction of judgment and choice. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
8. Böckenholt, I., & Gaul, W. (1986). Analysis of choice behavior via probabilistic ideal point and vector models. Applied Stochastic Models and Data Analysis, 2, 209-226.
9. Böckenholt, U., & Dillon, W. R. (1997). Modeling within-subject dependencies in ordinal paired comparison data. Psychometrika, 62, 414-434.
10. Bradbury, H., & Ross, K. (1990). The effects of novelty and choice materials on the intransitivity of preferences of children and adults. Annals of Operations Research, 23, 141-159.
11. Bradley, R. A. (1965). Another interpretation of a model for paired comparisons. Psychometrika, 30, 315-318.
12. Bradley, R. A. (1984). Paired comparisons: Some basic procedures and examples. In P. R. Krishnaiah & P. K. Sen (Eds.) Handbook of statistics (Vol. 4, pp. 299-326). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
13. Browne, W. J. (1999). Applying MCMC methods to multilevel models. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
14. Brownstone, D., & Train, K. (1999). Forecasting new product penetration with flexible substitution patterns. Journal of Econometrics, 89, 109-129.
15. Carroll, J. D., & DeSoete, G. (1991). Toward a new paradigm for the study of multiattribute choice behavior. American Psychologist, 46, 342-351.
16. Cohen, A. S., & van Tassel, E. (1978). A comparison of complete and incomplete paired comparisons in sociometric measurement of preschool groups. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2, 31-40.
17. David, H. A. (1988). The method of paired comparisons. London: Griffin.
18. Evans, M., & Swartz, T. (2000). Approximating integrals via Monte Carlo and deterministic methods. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
19. Fienberg, S. E., & Larntz, K. (1976). Log-linear representation for paired and multiple comparison models. Biometrika, 63, 245-254.
20. Goldstein, H. (1995). Multilevel statistical models (2nd ed.) London: Edward Arnold.
21. Goldstein, H., & Rasbash, J. (1996). Improved approximations for multilevel models with binary responses. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 159, 505-513.
22. Halff, H. M. (1976). Choice theories for differentially comparable alternatives. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 14, 244-246.
23. Hedeker, D., & Gibbons, R. (1996). MIXOR: A computer program for mixed-effects ordinal regression analysis. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 49, 157-176.
24. Kendall, M. G. (1975). Rank correlation methods. London: Griffin.
25. Koppleman, F. S., & Wen, C.-H. (2000). The paired combinatorial logit model: Properties, estimation and application. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 34, 75-89.
26. Kroeger, K. (1992). Modeling intransitivity through logbilinear models. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
27. Longford, N. T. (1993). Random coefficient models. New York: Oxford University Press.
28. Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley.
29. Luce, R. D. (1977). The choice axiom after twenty years. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 15, 215-233.
30. May, K. O. (1954). Intransitivity, utility, and the aggregation of preference patterns. Econometrica, 22, 1-13.
31. McCullagh, P., & Neider, J. A. (1989). Generalized linear models. London: Chapman & Hall.
32. McGuire, D. P., & Davidson, M. L. (1991). Testing group differences in paired comparison data. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 171-182.
33. Mellers, B. A., & Biagini, K. (1994). Similarity and choice. Psychological Review, 101, 505-518.
34. Morrison, H. W. (1963). Testable conditions for triads of paired comparison choices. Psychometrika, 28, 369-390.
35. Munizaga, M. A., Heydecker, B. G., & de Ortuzar, J. (2000). Representation of heteroscedasticity in discrete choice models. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 34, 219-240.
36. Rasbash, J., Browne, W., Goldstein, H., Yang, M., Plewis, I., Healy, M., Wodhouse, G., Draper, D., Langford, I., & Lewis, T. (2000). A user's guide to MLwiN: Version 2.1. London: Institute of Education, University of London.
37. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. (2000). HLM 5: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
38. Raudenbush, S. W., Yang, M. L., & Yosef, M. (2000). Maximum likelihood for hierarchical models via higher-order, multivariate Laplace approximation. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 9, 141-157.
39. Robinson, W. S. (1950). Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review, 15, 351-357.
40. Rodriguez, G., & Goldman, N. (1995). An assessment of estimation procedures for multilevel models with binary responses. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 158, 73-89.
41. Roelosfma, P. H. M. P., & Read, D. (2000). Intransitive intertemporal choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13, 161-177.
42. Rumelhart, D. L., & Greeno, J. G. (1971). Similarity between stimuli: An experimental test of the Luce and Restle choice models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 8, 370-381.
43. Sen, A. (1993). Internal consistency of choice. Econometrica, 61, 405-421.
44. Snijders, A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analyses: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Springall, A. (1973). Response surface fitting using a generalization of the Bradley-Terry paired comparison model. Applied Statistics, 22, 59-68.
46. Stroud, A. H., & Secrest, D. (1966). Gaussian quadrature formulas. New York: Prentice Hall.
47. Takane, Y. (1980). Maximum likelihood estimation in the generalized cases of Thurstone's law of comparative judgment. Japanese Psychological Research, 22, 188-196.
48. Takane, Y. (1987). Analysis of covariance structures and probabilistic binary choice data. Cognition and Communication, 20, 45-62.
49. Train, K. (1986). Qualitative choice analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
50. Tsai, R. (2000). Remarks on the identifiability of Thurstonian ranking models: Case V, Case III, or neither? Psychometrika, 65, 233-240.
51. Tversky, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preference. Psychological Review, 76, 31-48.
52. Tversky, A., & Russo, J. E. (1969). Substitutability and similarity in binary choices. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 6, 1-12.
53. Tversky, A., & Simonson, I. (1993). Context-dependent preferences. Management Science, 39, 1179-1189.
54. van Acker, P. (1990). Transitivity revisited. Annals of Operations Research, 23, 1-35.
55. van Putten, W. L. J. (1982). Maximum likelihood estimation for Luce's choice model. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 25, 163-174.
56. Williams, E. R. (1976). Resolvable paired comparison designs. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 38, 171-174.
57. Yao, G., & Böckenholt, U. (1999). Bayesian estimation of Thurstonian ranking models based on the Gibbs sampler. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 52, 79-92.
58. Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 15, 151-175.