Optical properties of gas-phase tryptophan-silver cations: Charge transfer from the indole ring to the silver atom

ChemPhysChem

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 524-528

  Antoine, Rodolphe ^a   Tabarin, Thibault ^a   Broyer, Michel ^a   Dugourd, Philippe ^a   Mitrić, Roland ^b   Bonačić Koutecký, Vlasta ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LYON 1   (France)

^b HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Amino acids; Charge transfer; Density functional calculations; Laser spectroscopy; Silver

Indexed keywords

ABSORPTION SPECTROSCOPY; AMINO ACIDS; CHARGE TRANSFER; DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE ABSORPTION; EXCITED STATES; GASES; LASER SPECTROSCOPY; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; OPTICAL PARAMETRIC OSCILLATORS; OPTICAL PROPERTIES; POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS; SILVER;

BOLTZMANN AVERAGES; CONFIGURATION-INTERACTION CALCULATIONS; DIRECT MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; ELECTRONIC EXCITATION SPECTRA; ENERGY TRANSITIONS; QUADRUPOLE ION TRAPS; THEORETICAL INVESTIGATIONS; TIME DEPENDENT DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY;

SILVER COMPOUNDS;

EID: 32944461072     PISSN: 14394235     EISSN: 14397641     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.200500495     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. I. Bertini, H. B. Gray, S. J. Lippard, J. S. Valentine, Bioinorganic Chemistry, Univ. Sci. Books, Mill Valley, 1994.
2. W. F. DeGrado, C. M. Summa, V. Pavone, F. Nastri, A. Lombardi, Ann. Rev. Biochemistry 1999, 68, 779.
3. Y. Lu, S. M. Berry, T. D. Pfister, Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3047.
4. E. Katz, I. Willner, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6042.
5. T. Shoeib, A. C. Hopkinson, K. W. M. Siu, J. Phys. Chem. B 2001, 105, 12 399.
6. T. Shoeib, C. F. Rodriquez, K. W. M. Siu, A. C. Hopkinson, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2001, 3, 853.
7. Y. Hoppilliard, G. Ohanessian, S. Bourcier, J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 9687.
8. C. Ruan, M. T. Rodgers, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 14 600.
9. V. Ryzhov, R. C. Dunbar, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 2259.
10. A. S. Lemoff, M. F. Bush, E. R. Williams, J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 1903.
11. W. A. Tao, L. Wu, R. G. Cooks, J. Am. Soc., Mass Spectrom. 2001, 12, 490.
12. V. W. M. Lee, H. Li, T. C. Lau, R. Guevremont, K. W. M. Siu, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 1998, 9, 760.
13. T. Wyttenbach, J. E. Bushnell, M. T. Bowers, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5098.
14. T. Wyttenbach, M. Witt, M. T. Bowers, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 3458.
15. M. Kohtani, B. S. Kinnear, M. F. Jarrold, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 12 377.
16. T. Shoeib, K. W. M. Siu, A. C. Hopkinson, J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 6121.
17. C. Kapota, J. Lemaire, P. Maître, G. Ohanessian, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 1836.
18. K. F. Willey, P. Y. Cheng, K. D. Pearce, M. A. Duncan, J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 4769.
19. K. F. Willey, P. Y. Cheng, M. B. Bishop, M. A. Duncan, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 4721.
20. Y.-S. Yang, W.-Y. Hsu, H.-F. Lee, Y.-C. Huang, C.-S. Yeh, C. H. Hu, J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 11 287.
21. F. O. Talbot, T. Tabarin, R. Antoine, M. Broyer, P. Dugourd, J. Chem. Phys. 2005, 122, 074310.
22. A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 5648.
23. C. Lee, W. Yang, R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B 1988, 37, 785.
24. V. Bonacic-Koutecky, V. Veyret, R. Mitric, J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115, 10 450.
25. V. Bonacic-Koutecky, J. Pittner, M. Boiron, P. Fantucci, J. Chem. Phys. 1999, 110, 3876.
26. F. Furche, R. Ahlrichs, J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 7433.
27. D. Nolting, C. Marian, R. Weinkauf, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2004, 6, 2633.
28. T. R. Rizzo, Y. D. Park, L. Peteanu, D. H. Levy, J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 83, 4819.
29. A. Dreuw, M. Head-Gordon, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4007.
30. The transition energies of excited states with relatively long-range charge-transfer character, calculated in the framework of TD-DFT, are usually red-shifted. The simplest explanation for this is that the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) in DFT still corresponds approximately to the ionization potential (IP) but the lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) is more bound than in HF and cannot be related to the electron affinity (EA). Therefore, the negative of the LUMO energy is larger than the electron affinity and the orbital energy difference corresponding to CT is considerably lower than the realistic excitation energy. Moreover, the DFT orbital energy is subjected to the so-called self-interaction (SI) error. Since this error is of the same order of magnitude for the occupied and virtual orbitals, the orbital energy differences are relatively good approximations for the excitation energies of non-CT valence excited states. They do not require a change in the number of electrons within independent subsystems, which is necessary for CT states.
31. G. Granucci, M. Persico, A. Toniolo, J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 10 608.
32. H. Kang, C. Jouvet, C. Dedonder-Lardeux, S. Martrenchard, G. Grégoire, C. Desfrançois, J. P. Schermann, M. Barat, J. A. Fayeton, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 394.
33. H. El-Aribi, G. Orlova, A. C. Hopkinson, K. W. M. Siu, J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 3844.
34. J. Hager, M. Ivanco, M. A. Smith, S. C. Wallace, Chem. Phys. Lett. 1985, 113, 503.
35. C. Sieber, J. Buttet, W. Harbich, C. Félix, R. Mitric, V. Bonacic-Koutecky, Phys. Rev. A 2004, 70, 041201.
36. V. Bonacic-Koutecký, L. Cešpiva, P. Fantucci, J. Koutecký, Z. Phys. D 1993, 26, 287.