Production of biomass (algae-bacteria) by using a mixture of settled swine and sewage as substrate

Journal of Environmental Science and Health - Part A Toxic/Hazardous Substances and Environmental Engineering

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 415-429

  Travieso, L ^a   Benitez F ^b   Sanchez E ^a   Borja, R ^a   Colmenarejo, M F ^c  

^a INSTITUTO DE LA GRASA   (Spain)

^b Ministerio de Ciencia   (Cuba)

^c INSTITUTO DE CIENCIAS AGRARIAS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Biomass production; Continuous culture; Dilution rate; Kinetics; Mixed swine and sewage waste

Indexed keywords

ALGAE; BACTERIA; NITROGEN; OXYGEN; SEWAGE; SUBSTRATES;

BIOMASS PRODUCTION; CONTINUOUS CULTURE; DILUTION RATE; KINETICS; MIXED SWINE AND SEWAGE WASTE;

BIOMASS;

AMMONIA; CHLOROPHYLL; NITROGEN; PHOSPHATE; PHOSPHORUS DERIVATIVE;

AEROBIC BACTERIUM; ARTICLE; BIOCHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CHLORELLA VULGARIS; DILUTION; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; FEASIBILITY STUDY; KINETICS; NONHUMAN; PH; SEWAGE; SWINE; WASTE;

ALGAE; ANIMALS; BACTERIA; BIODEGRADATION, ENVIRONMENTAL; BIOMASS; CHLOROPHYLL; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; KINETICS; NITROGEN; OXYGEN; PHOSPHATES; PHOSPHORUS; SEWAGE; SWINE; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WATER PURIFICATION;

ALGAE; CHLORELLA VULGARIS; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 32944454963     PISSN: 10934529     EISSN: 15324117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10934520500428302     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Lavoie, A.; de la Noüe, J. Hyper-concentrate culture of Scenedesmus obliquus a new approach for wastewater tertiary treatment. Water Res. 1985, 19, 1437-1442.
2. Pearson, H.W.; Mara, D.D.; Mills, S.W.; Smallman D.J. Factors determining algal population in waste stabilization pond and the influence of algae on the performance. Water Sci. Technol. 1987, 19 (12), 131-140.
3. Travieso, L.; Benítez, F.; Sánchez, E. Microalgae ponds for swine waste treatment. Ciencia y Técnica en la Agricultura. Veterinaria 1988, 9 (1), 7-17.
4. Oswald, W.J. Photosynthesis in sewage treatments. J. Sanit. Eng. Division. 1955, 81, 321-329.
5. Valderrama, L.T.; Del Campo, C.M.; Rodriguez, C.M.; de-Bashan, L.E.; Bashan, Y. Treatment of recalcitrant wastewater from ethanol and citric acid production using the microalga Chlorella vulgaris and the macrophyte Lemna minuscule. Water Res. 2002, 36 (17), 4185-4192.
6. Travieso, L.; Benítez, F. Unicellular microalgae growth on Swine Waste. Ciencia y Técnica en la Acuicultura. Ganado Porcino. 1982, 5 (3), 89-99.
7. Piorreck, M.; Baasch, K.H.; Pohl, P. Biomass production, total protein, chlorophylls, lipids and fatty acids of freshwater green and blue-green algae under different nitrogen regimes. Phytochem. 1984, 23 (2), 207-216.
8. Grobbelaar, J.U.; Soeder, C.J.; Stengel, H. Modelling algal productivity in large outdoor cultures and wastewater systems. Biomass 1990, 21, 297-314.
9. Vilchez, C.; Garvallo, I.; Lobato, M.V.; Vega, J.M. Microalgae-mediated chemicals production and wastes removal. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1997, 20 (8), 562-572.
10. Sevrin-Reyssac, J. Biotreatment of swine manure by production of aquatic valuable biomasses. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 1998, 68 (3), 177-186.
11. Kayombo, S.; Mbwette, T.S.A.; Katima, J.H.Y.; Jorgensen, S.E. Effect of substrate concentration on the growth of heterotrophic bacteria and algae in secondary facultative ponds. Water Res. 2003, 37 (12), 2937-2943.
12. Olaizola, M. Commercial development of microalgal biotechnology: from the test tube to the marketplace. Biomol. Engin. 2003, 20 (4-6), 459-466.
13. Andreadakis, A.D. Anaerobic digestion of swine wastes. Water Sci. Technol. 1992, 25, 9-16.
14. Sánchez, E.; Monroy, O.; Cañizares, R.O.; Travieso, L. Comparative study of swine waste treatment by upflow sludge beds anaerobic reactors and packed bed reactors. J. Agric. Engin. Res. 1995, 62, 71-76.
15. Sánchez, E.; Borja, R.; Weiland, P.; Travieso, L. Effect of substrate concentration and temperature on the anaerobic digestion of swine waste in tropical climates. Process Biochem. 2001, 37, 483-489.
16. Finlayson, M.; Chick, A.; von Oertzen, I.; Mitchel, D. Treatment of swine effluents by an aquatic plant filter. Biol. Wastes 1987, 19, 179-196.
17. Shi, X.M.; Zhang, X.W.; Cheng, F. Heterotrophic production of biomass and lutein by Chlorella protothecoides on various nitrogen sources. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2000, 27 (3-5), 312-318.
18. Wang, B.; Dong, W.; Zhang, J.; Cao, X. Experimental study of high rate pond system treating swine wastewater. Water Sci. Technol. 1996, 34 (11), 125-132.
19. American Public Health Association, APHA. Standard Methods for the Examination of Waters and Wastewaters, APHA, WCPF, AWWA, 20th Ed., Washington, DC, USA, 1999.
20. Peña, M.R.; Mara, D.D.; Sánchez, A. Dispersion studies in anaerobic ponds. Implications for design and operation. Water Sci. Technol. 2000, 42 (10-11), 273-282.
21. Mayo, A.W.; Noike, T. Effect of temperature and pH on the growth of heterotrophic bacteria in waste stabilization pond. Water Res. 1996, 30 (2), 447-455.
22. Tadesse, I.; Green, F.B.; Puhakka, J.A. Seasonal and diurnal variations of temperature, pH and dissolved oxygen in advanced integrated wastewater pond system treating tannery effluent. Water Res. 2004, 38 (3), 645-654.
23. de la Noüe, J.; Basseres, A. Bio-treatment of anaerobically treated swine manure with microalgae. Biol. Wastes 1989, 29, 17-31.
24. Lau, P.S.; Tam, N.F.Y.; Wong, Y.S. Operational optimisation of batch wise nutrient removal from wastewater by carageenan immobilized Chlorella vulgaris. Water Sci. Technol. 1998, 38 (1), 185-192.
25. Lau, P.S.; Tam, N.F.Y.; Wong, Y.S. Effect of algal density on nutrient removal from primary settled wastewater. Environ. Pollut. 1995, 89 (1-2), 59-66.
26. Maurer, M.; Boller, M. Modelling of phosphorus precipitation in wastewater treatment plants with enhanced biological phosphorus removal. Water Sci. Technol. 1999, 39 (1), 147-163.
27. Bouropoulus, N.C.; Koutsoukos, P.G. Spontaneous precipitation of struvite from aqueous solutions. J. Crystal Growth 2000, 213 (3-4), 381-388.
28. Andrews, J.F. A mathematical model for the continuous culture of microorganisms utilizing inhibitory substrates. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1968, 10, 707-723.
29. Riboo, C.; González, O.; Herrero, C.; Cid, A. Physiological response of freshwater microalga (Chlorella vulgaris) to triazine and phenylurea herbicides. Aquatic Toxicol. 2002, 59 (3-4), 225-235.
30. Borowitzka, M.A. Commercial production of microalgae: ponds, tanks, tubes and fermenters. J. Biotechnol. 1999, 70 (1-3), 313-321.
31. Hase, R.; Oikawa, H.; Sasao, C.; Morita, M.; Watanabe, Y. Photosynthetic production of microalgal biomass in a raceway system under greenhouse conditions in Sendai city. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2000, 89 (2), 157-163.
32. Molina, E.; Belarbi, E.H.; Ancien, F.G.; Robles, A.; Chisti, Y. Recovery of microalgal biomass and metabolites: process options and economics. Biotechnol. Adv. 2003, 20 (7-8); 491-515.
33. Zhang, X.W.; Cheng, F.; Johns, M.R. Kinetic models for heterotrophic growth of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii in batch and fed-batch cultures. Proc. Biochem. 1999, 35 (3-4), 385-389.