An interview protocol and scoring rubric for evaluating teacher performance

Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 161-168

  Flowers, Claudia P ^a   Hancock, Dawson R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 32844469216     PISSN: 0969594X     EISSN: 1465329X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0969594032000121261     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ARCHER, J., 2000. State teacher policies tied to student results. Education Week, 19(17): 3–4.
2. BRANDT, R., 1996. On a new direction for teacher evaluation. Educational Leadership, 53(6): 30–33.
3. BROPHY, J. E., and GOOD, T. L., 1986. “ Teacher behavior and student achievement ”. In Handbook of Research on Teaching, (3rd edn), Edited by: WITTROCK, M., New York: Macmillan.
4. DANIELSON, C., and MCGREAL, T. L., 2000. Teacher Evaluation: to enhance professional practice, Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
5. DARLING-HAMMOND, L., 1997. The Right to Learn: a blueprint for creating schools that work, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6. DARLING-HAMMOND, L., and SNYDER, J., 2000. Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5/6): 523–545.
7. DAVEY, L., and NEILL, M., 1991. The Case Against a National Test (Report No. EDO-TM-91-6)., Washington DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED33870)
8. HUTCHINGS, P., and SHULMAN, L. S., 1999. The scholarship of teaching. Change, 31(5): 10–17.
9. INTERSTATE NEW TEACHER ASSESSMENT AND SUPPORT CONSORTIUM (INTASC). 1995. INTASC Standards for Competent Beginning Teachers Available online at: http://www.ccsso.org/ intascst.html
10. KOHN, A., 2000. The Case Against Standardized Testing: raising the scores, ruining the schools, Westport, CT: Heinemann.
11. LINN, R. L., 2000. Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(2): 4–16.
12. McLAUGHLIN, M. W., 1990. “ Embracing contraries: implementing and sustaining teacher evaluation ”. In The New Handbook of Teacher Evaluation, Edited by: MILLMAN, J., and DARLING-HAMMOND, L., Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13. McMILLAN, J. H., 2001. Classroom Assessment: principles and practice for effective instruction, (2nd edn), Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
14. MOSKAL, B. M., 2000. Scoring Rubrics pan I: what and when (Report No. EDO-TM-00-1)., Washington DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED446110)
15. NATIONAL BOARD FOR PROFESSIONAL TEACHING STANDARDS (NBPTS). 1996. NBPTS standards for accomplished teachers Available online at: http://www.nbpts.org
16. NEILL, M., 1999. Stop misusing tests to evaluate teachers. Social Education, 63(6): 330–333.
17. NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION. 2002. Teacher Evaluation Systems of North Carolina Available online at: http://www.ncpublicschools.org
18. PAPANASTASIOU, E. C., 1999. Teacher Evaluation: theories and practice (Report No. TM 030694)., Washington DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED439157)
19. PETERSON, K. D., 2000. Teacher Evaluation: a comprehensive guide to new directions and practices, (2nd edn), Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
20. POPHAM, W. J., 2000. Putting instruction on the line. The School Administrator, 57(11): 46–48.
21. SCLAN, E. M., 1994. Performance Evaluation for Experienced Teachers: an overview of state policies, Washington DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 373054)
22. SEARFOSS, L. W., and ENZ, B. J., 1996. Can teacher evaluation reflect holistic instruction?. Educational Leadership, 53(6): 38–41.
23. SHULMAN, L. S., 1998. Theory, practice, and the education of professionals. The Elementary School Journal, 98(5): 511–517.
24. STIGGINS, R. J., 1998. Classroom Assessment for Student Success, Washington DC: National Education Association.
25. SULLIVAN, K. A., and ZIRKEL, P. A., 1999. Documentation in teacher evaluation: what does the professional literature say?. NAASP Bulletin, 83(607): 48–59.
26. TELL, C., 2001. Appreciating good teaching: a conversation with Lee Shulman. Educational Leadership, 58(5): 6–11.
27. WEISS, E. M., and WEISS, S. G., 1998. New Directions in Teacher Evaluation, Washington DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 429052