Peer-to-peer human-robot interaction for space exploration

AAAI Fall Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn FS-04-05, Issue , 2004, Pages 87-90

  Fong, Terrence ^a   Nourbakhsh, Illah ^a  

^a NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; MAN MACHINE SYSTEMS; ROBOTS; SPACE RESEARCH;

CONTEXTUAL DIALOGUE; HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION; SPACE EXPLORATION;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 32844468412     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Cabrol, N. 1999. Proceedings of the Astronaut-Rover interaction post Silver Lake field test debriefing: results, lessons learned, and directions for future human exploration of planetary surfaces. Technical Report NP-2004-01-334-HQ, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA.
2. Fong, T., Kaber, D., Lewis, M., Scholtz, J., Schultz, A., and Steinfeld, A. 2004. Common metrics for human-robot interaction, in submission.
3. Fong, T., Thorpe, C., and Baur, C. 2003. Multi-robot remote driving with collaborative control. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 50(4).
4. Fong, T. 2001. Collaborative control: a robot-centric model for vehicle teleoperation. Ph.D. Dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. CMU-RI-TR-01-34.
5. Goodrich, M., and Olsen, D. 2003. Seven principles of efficient human robot interaction. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 3943-3948.
6. Hansen, R., and Ford, K. 2004. A human centered vision of Mars exploration. Technical Report NAG9-1386, Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, University of West Florida.
7. Hart, S., and Staveland, L. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In Hancock, P., and Meshkati, N., eds., Human Mental Workload. North-Holland Elsevier Science.
8. Huntsberger, T., Rodriguez, G., and Schenker, P. 2000. Robotics challenges for robotic and human Mars exploration. In Proc. Robotics.
9. Jones, H., and Rock, S. 2002. Dialogue-based human-robot interaction for space construction teams. In Proc. IEEE Aerospace Conference.
10. McFarlane, D. 1990. Coordinating the interruption of people in human-computer interaction. In Proc. HCI Interact.
11. NASA. 2004. The vision for space exploration. Technical Report NP-2004-01-334-HQ, NASA, Washington, DC.
12. Proud, R., Hard, J., and Mrozinski, R. 2003. Methods for determining the level of autonomy to design into a human spaceflight vehicle: a function specific approach. In Proc. NIST Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems.
13. Rodriguez, G., and Weisbin, C. 2003. A new method to evaluate human-robot system performance. Autonomous Robots 14(2):165-178.
14. Scholtz, J., Young, J., Drury, J., and Yanco, H. 2004. Evaluation of human-robot interaction awareness in search and rescue. In Proc. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.
15. Scholtz, J. 2003. Theory and evaluation of human robot interactions. In Proc. Hawaii International Conference on System Science 36.
16. Smith, B., and Tyler, S. 1997. The design and application of MIDAS: a constructive simulation for human-system analysis. In Proc. Simulation Technology and Training (SIMTECT).
17. Sofge, D., Perzanowski, D., Skubic, M., Bugajska, M., Trafton, J., Cassimatis, N., Brock, D., Adams, W., and Schultz, A. 2004. Cognitive tools for humanoid robots in space. In Proc. IFAC Symposium on Automatic Control in Aerospace.
18. Sun, R., and Ling, C. 1998. Computational cognitive modeling, the source of power, and other related issues. AI Magazine (Summer 1998).