Representation of lexical form: Evidence from studies of sublexical ambiguity

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1308-1314

  McLennan, Conor T ^a,b   Luce, Paul A ^a   Charles Luce, Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

Author keywords

Allophonic specificity; Lexical; Phonological ambiguity; Spoken word recognition; Sublexical

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; SEMANTICS;

HUMANS; PHONETICS; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEMANTICS; VOCABULARY;

EID: 32644480632     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1308     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Charles-Luce, J. (1997). Cognitive factors involved in preserving a phonemic contrast. Language and Speech, 40, 229-248.
2. Church, B. A., & Schacter, D. L. (1994). Perceptual specificity of auditory priming: Implicit memory for voice intonation and fundamental frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 43-57.
3. Connine, C. M. (2004). It's not what you hear but how often you hear it: On the neglected role of phonological variant frequency in auditory word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1084-1089.
4. Fox, R. A., & Terbeek, D. (1977). Dental flaps, vowel duration and rule ordering in American English. Journal of Phonetics, 5, 27-34.
5. Goldinger, S. D. (1996). Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1166-1183.
6. Grossberg, S. D. (1986). The adaptive self-organization of serial order in behavior: Speech, language, and motor control. In E. C. Schwab & H. C. Nusbaum (Eds.), Pattern recognition by humans and machines, Vol. 1: Speech perception (pp. 187-294). New York: Academic Press.
7. Grossberg, S., & Myers, C. W. (2000). The resonant dynamics of speech perception: Interword integration and duration-dependent backward effects. Psychological Review, 107, 735-767.
8. Ladefoged, P. (2001). A course in phonetics (4th ed.). New York: Harcourt College.
9. Luce, P. A., Goldinger, S. D., Auer, E. T., & Vitevitch, M. S. (2000). Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and PARSYN. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 615-625.
10. Luce, P. A., & McLennan, C. T. (2005). Spoken word recognition: The challenge of variation. In D. B. Pisoni & R. E. Remez (Eds.), Handbook of speech perception (pp. 591-609). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
11. McLennan, C. T. (in press). The time course of variability effects in the perception of spoken language: Changes across the lifespan. Language and Speech.
12. McLennan, C. T., & Luce, P. A. (2005). Examining the time course of indexical specificity effects in spoken word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 306-321.
13. McLennan, C. T., Luce, P. A., & Charles-Luce, J. (2003). Representation of lexical form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 539-553.
14. McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1-86.
15. Mullennix, J. W., Pisoni, D. B., & Martin, C. S. (1989). Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85, 365-378.
16. Patterson, D., & Connine, C. M. (2001). Variant frequency in flap production: A corpus analysis of variant frequency in American English flap production. Phonetica, 58, 254-275.
17. Pisoni, D. B., & Luce, P. A. (1987). Acoustic-phonetic representations in word recognition. Cognition, 25, 1-52.