Preview search and contextual cuing

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 31, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1346-1358

  Hodsoll, John P ^a   Humphreys, Glyn W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Contextual cuing; Preview search; Visual search

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ADULT; CUES; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; REACTION TIME; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 32644473176     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1346     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Braithwaite, J. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2003). Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: Evidence from effects of foreknowledge on preview search. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 217-237.
2. Braithwaite, J. J., Humphreys, G. W., & Hulleman, J. (2005). Color-based grouping and inhibition in visual search: Evidence from a probe-detection analysis of preview search. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 81-101.
3. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cuing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28-71.
4. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science, 10, 360-365.
5. Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (2003). Implicit, long-term spatial contextual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 224-234.
6. Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2001). Visual marking besides the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 891-900.
7. Donk, M., & Verburg, R. C. (2004). Prioritizing new elements with a brief preview period: Evidence against visual marking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 282-288.
8. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433-458.
9. Humphreys, G. W., Braithwaite, J. J., Olivers, C. N. L., & Watson, D. G. (in press). Dynamic uses of memory in visual search over space and time. In C. McLeod & N. Nobato (Eds.), Dynamic processes in memory. London: Academic Press.
10. Humphreys, G. W., Jung-Stalmann, B., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2004). An analysis of the time course of attention in preview search. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 610-635.
11. Humphreys, G. W., Kyllinsbæk, S., Watson, D. G., Olivers, C. N. L., Law, I., & Paulson, O. (2004). Parieto-occipital areas involved in efficient filtering in search: A time course analysis of visual marking using behavioural and functional imaging procedures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 57(A), 610-635.
12. Humphreys, G. W., Watson, D. G., & Jolicoeur, P. (2002). Fractionating the preview benefit in search: Dual-task decomposition of visual marking by timing and modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 640-660.
13. Jiang, Y., & Chun, M. M. (2001). Selective attention modulates implicit learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 54(A), 1105-1124.
14. Jiang, Y., Chun, M. M., & Marks, L. (2002). Visual marking: Selective attention to asynchronous temporal groups. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 717-730.
15. Jiang, Y., & Leung A. W. (2005). Implicit learning of ignored visual context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 100-106.
16. Jiang, Y., & Vickery, T. (2004). Preview search and inhibition. Manuscript submitted for publication.
17. Kunar, M. A., Humphreys, G. W., & Smith, K. J. (2003). History matters: The preview benefit in search is not onset capture. Psychological Science, 14, 181-185.
18. Kunar, M., Humphreys, G. W., Smith, K. J., & Hulleman, J. (2003). What is "marked" in visual marking? Evidence for effects of configuration in preview search. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 982-996.
19. Livingstone, M. S., & Hubel, D. H. (1987). Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement and depth. Journal of Neuroscience, 7, 3416-3468.
20. Lleras, A., & Von Mühlenen, A. (2004). Spatial context and top-down strategies in visual search. Spatial Vision, 17, 465-482.
21. Neurobehavioral Systems. (2003). Presentation [Computer software]. Albany, CA: Author.
22. Olivers, C. N. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2003). Visual marking inhibits singleton capture. Cognitive Psychology, 47, 1-42.
23. Olivers, C. N. L., Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1999). Visual marking of locations and feature maps: Evidence from within-dimension conjunctions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 52(A), 679-715.
24. Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2001a). Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context. Visual Cognition, 9, 273-302.
25. Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2001b). Temporal contextual cuing of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1299-1313.
26. Peterson, M. S., & Kramer, A. F. (2001). Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1239-1249.
27. Theeuwes, J., Atchley, P., & Kramer, A. F. (1998). Visual marking of old objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 130-134.
28. Van Selst, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (1994). A solution to the effect of sample size on outlier elimination. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 47(A), 631-650.
29. Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90-122.
30. Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1998). Visual marking of moving objects: A role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 946-962.
31. Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (2000). Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 471-481.
32. Watson, D. G., Humphreys, G. W., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2004). Visual marking: Using time as well as space in visual selection. In C. Kaern-bach, E. Schröger, & H. Müller (Eds.), Psychophysics beyond sensation: Laws and invariants of human cognition (pp. 289-309). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 13-73). London: University College London Press.