Dynamic change and its prediction of ecological footprint in ecotone of Yunnan Province: A case study of Lijiang Naxi Autonomous County

Chinese Journal of Ecology

Volumn 24, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 1418-1424

  Jiang, Yiyi ^a   Wang, Yanglin ^a   Zhang, Yuan ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Dynamic change; Ecological footprint; Ecotone; Lijiang Naxi Autonomous County; Prediction

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS; ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; ECOTONE; MEASUREMENT METHOD; PREDICTION; SUSTAINABILITY;

ASIA; CHINA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; LIJIANG; YUNNAN;

EID: 32644463167     PISSN: 10004890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Chinese source. 2003. 23(5):1-6.
2. Chinese source. 2003. 21(3):324-330.
3. Chinese source. 2002. 27(4):42-45.
4. Chinese source. 2001. 24(4):305-309.
5. Chinese source. 2002. 3:3-5.
6. Chinese source. 2001. 23(2):164-169.
7. Chinese source. 2001. 23(6):25-29.
8. Chinese source. 1986.
9. Chinese source. 2002. 39(3):441-445.
10. Chinese source. 2003. 14(2):280-285.
11. Alden DM, Proops JLR, Gay PW. 1998. Industrial hemp's double dividend: A study for the USA[J]. Ecol. Econ., 25:291-301.
12. Bicknell KB, Ball RJ, Cullen R, et al. 1998. New methodology for the ecological footprint with an application to the New Zealand economy[J]. Ecol. Econ., 27:149-160.
13. Fricker A. 1998. The ecological footprint of New Zealand as a step towards sustainability[J]. Futures, 30(6):559-567.
14. Gerbens-Leenes PW, Nonhebel S. 2002. Consumption patterns and their effects on land required for food[J]. Ecol. Econ., 42:185-199.
15. Gerbens-Leenes PW, Nonhebel S, Ivens WPMF. 2002. A method to determine land requirements relating to food consumption patterns[J]. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 90:47-58.
16. Gossling S, Hansson CB, Horstmeier O, et al. 2002. Ecological footprint analysis as a tool to assess tourism sustainability[J]. Ecol. Econ., 43:199-211.
17. Hardi P, Barg S, Hodge T, et al. 1997. Measuring sustainable development: Review of current practice [A]. Occasional Paper Number 17 [C]. Ottawa Ontario: Industry Canada.
18. Jasson AM, Zucchetto J. 1978. Energy, economic and ecological relationships for Gotland, Sweden: A regional system study[A]. Swedish Natural Science Research Council: Ecological Bulletins 28[C]. Stockholu: Swedish Natural Science Research Council.
19. Lenzen M, Murray SA. 2001. A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia[J]. Ecol. Econ., 37:229-255.
20. Odum EP. 1975. Ecology: The Link Between the Natural and Social Sciences[M]. New York: Holt-Saunders.
21. Odum EP. 1989. Ecology and Our Endangered Life-support system[M]. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.
22. Rees WE. 1992. Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: What urban economics leaves out[J]. Environ. Urbaniz., 4(2):121-130.
23. Rees WE, Wackernagel M. 1998. Monetary analysis: Turning a blind eye on sustainability[J]. Ecol. Econ., 29:47-52.
24. Rees WE, Wackernagel M. 1996. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth[M]. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
25. Rees WE, Wackernagel M. 1996. Urban ecological footprints: Why cites cannot be sustainable and why they are a key to sustainability [J]. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 16:223-248.
26. Wackernagel M, Lewan L, Borgström-Hansson C. 1999. Evaluating the use of natural capital with the ecological footprint: Applications in Sweden and sub-regions[J]. Ambio, 28:604-612.
27. Wackernagel M, Onisto L, Bello P, et al. 1999. National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept[J]. Ecol. Econ., 29:375-390.
28. Wackernagel M, Rees WE. 1997. Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital: Economics from an ecological footprint perspective[J]. Ecol. Econ., 20:3-24.
29. Wackernagel M, Silverstein J. 2000. Big things first focusing on the scale imperative with the ecological footprint[J]. Ecol. Econ., 32:391-394.
30. Warren-Rhodes K, Koenig A. 2001. Ecosystem appropriation by Hong Kong and its implications for sustainable development[J]. Ecol. Econ., 39:347-359.