A framework for objective structural frame selection

Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers: Structures and Buildings

Volumn 159, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 45-52

  Soetanto, Robby ^a   Dainty, Andrew R J ^a   Glass, Jacqueline ^a   Price, Andrew D F ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Buildings, structures design; Research development structural frameworks

Indexed keywords

BUILDINGS; CIVIL ENGINEERING; DECISION MAKING; ENGINEERS; EVALUATION; PERFORMANCE; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES & DESIGN; FRAMEWORK FOSTERS; MULTI-CRITERIA; RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT STRUCTURAL FRAMEWORKS;

STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

BUILDINGS; CIVIL ENGINEERING; DECISION MAKING; ENGINEERS; EVALUATION; PERFORMANCE; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT; STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

CIVIL ENGINEERING;

EID: 32644446873     PISSN: 09650911     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1680/stbu.2006.159.1.45     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. HIGGIN G. and JESSOP N. Communications in the Building Industry: the Report of a Pilot Study. Tavistock Publications, London, 1965.
2. MOHSINI R. A. Performance and building: problems of evaluation. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, ASCE, 1989, 3, No. 4, 235-242.
3. BATES F. L. Institutions, organizations, and communities: a general theory of complex structures. Pacific Sociological Review, 1960, 3, No. 2, 59-70.
4. BALLAL T. M. A. and SHER W. D. Artificial neural network for the selection of buildable structural systems. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2003, 10, No. 4, 263-271.
5. IDRUS A. and NEWMAN J. Construction related factors influencing the choice of concrete floor systems. Construction Management and Economics, 2002, 20, 13-19.
6. IDRUS A. and NEWMAN J. IFESS: a computer tool to aid structural engineers at the conceptual design stage. Construction Innovation, 2003, 3, 127-143.
7. SOETANTO, R. DAINTY, A. R. J., GLASS J. and PRICE A. D. F. Criteria for assessing the potential performance of hybrid concrete structural frames. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2004, 11, No. 6, 414-425.
8. OPPENHEIM A. N. Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. Pinter, London, 1992.
9. GOODCHILD C. H. Hybrid Concrete Construction: Combining Structural Materials for Speed, Quality and Economy in Buildings. British Cement Association, Berkshire, 1995.
10. GLASS, J. and BAICHE, B., Perceptions of hybrid concrete construction in the UK construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2001, 8, No. 1, 67-77.
11. GLASS J. A best practice process model for hybrid concrete construction. Construction Management and Economics, 2005, 23, No. 2, 169-184.
12. ELLIOTT K. S. Precast Concrete in Mixed Construction: a State-of-the-Art Review. FIB Commission 6-Task Group TG2, 2002, FIB Bulletin No. 19.
13. KPI WORKING GROUP. KPI Report for the Minister for Construction. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London, 2000.
14. BUILDING RESEARCH ESTABLISHMENT. Housing Quality Indicators. BRE, Watford. See http://www.hqiuk.com/viewed May 2003.
15. SUSTAINABILITY WORKING GROUP. Environmental Performance Indicators for Sustainable Construction. See http://www.m4i.org.uk/rc/publications/reports/ m4i_epi_report2001.pdf viewed May 2003.
16. BUILDING RESEARCH ESTABLISHMENT. The M4I Sustainability Indicator Assessment Tool. BRE, Watford. See http://www.m4i.org.uk/m4i/toolkits/ sustainability/sustain.aspviewed May 2003.
17. BUILDING RESEARCH ESTABLISHMENT. BREEAM Offices 2003: Design & Procurement Assessment Checklist. BRE, Watford. See http://products.bre.co.uk/ breeam/BREEAM_May2003/pdf%/o20documents/DPPredictionChecklist2003.pdf viewed May 2003.
18. ARUP. Sustainable Project Appraisal Routine. See http://www.arup.com/ sustainability/services/services.cfm viewed May 2003.
19. DTI, BRE and CIRIA. Environment Key Performance Indicators. See http://www.cbpp.org.uk/news/article.jsp?id=1716 and http://www.cbpp.org.uk/ resourcecentre/publications/kpi.jsp viewed August 2003.
20. CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY COUNCIL. Design Quality Indicator Questionnaire. CIC, London, 2000.
21. COHEN R., STANDEVEN M., BORDASS B. and LEAMAN A. Assessing building performance in use 1: the Probe process. Building Research and Information, 2001, 29, No. 2, 85-102.
22. DOUGLAS J. Developments in appraising the total performance of buildings. Structural Survey, 1994, 12, No. 6, 10-15.
23. PREISER W. F. E. The habitability framework: a conceptual approach towards linking human behaviour and physical environment. Design Studies, 1983, 4, No. 2, 84-91.
24. PREISER W. F. E. Towards a performance-based conceptual framework for systematic POEs. In Building Evaluation PREISER W. F. E. (ed.) Plenum Press, New York, 1989.
25. PREISER W. F. E. Post-occupancy evaluation: how to make buildings work better. Facilities, 1995, 13, No. 11, 19-28.
26. CARPENTER C. L. and OLOUFA A. A. Post occupancy evaluation of buildings and development of facility performance criteria. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 1995, 1, No. 2, 77-81.
27. SANDERS P. A. and COLLINS B. L. Post-Occupancy Evaluation of the Forrestal Building. Report prepared for US Department of Energy by US Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Building and Fire Research Laboratory, Gaithersburg, 1995. See http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build95/PDF/b95080.pdf viewed May 2003.
28. BOTTOM C., MCGREAL S. and HEANEY G. Evaluating office environments using tenant organization perceptions. Facilities, 1997, 15, No. 7/8, 195-203.
29. Liu A. M. M. Residential satisfaction in housing estates: a Hong Kong perspective. Automation in Construction, 1999, 8, 511-524.
30. PREISER W. F. E. and SCHRAMM U. Intelligent office building performance evaluation. Facilities, 2002, 20, No. 7/8, 279-287.
31. GLASS J. Best Practice Guidance on Hybrid Concrete Construction, Work stage 2: Practitioner interviews. Unpublished research report, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, 2002.
32. BARRETT P. Hybrid concrete: improved processes and performance. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Structures and Buildings, 2003, 156, No. 2, 193-203.