Criteria for assessing the potential performance of hybrid concrete structural frames

Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management

Volumn 11, Issue 6, 2004, Pages 414-425

  Soetanto, R ^a   Dainty, A R J ^a   Glass, J ^a   Price, A D F ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Concretes; Design and development; Performance criteria

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION; COSTS; LIFE CYCLE; PERFORMANCE; TECHNOLOGY;

DESIGN QUALITY; FLEXIBILITY; PERFORMANCE CRITERIA; STAKEHOLDERS;

STRUCTURAL FRAMES;

EID: 9144221532     PISSN: 09699988     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/09699980410570175     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Arditi, D., Ergin, U. and Gunhan, S. (2000), "Factors affecting the use of precast concrete systems", Journal of Architectural Engineering, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 79-86.
2. Arup. (2003), Sustainable Project Appraisal Routine, available at: www.arup.com/sustainability/services/services.cfm (accessed May 2003)
3. Ballal, T.M.A. and Sher, W.D. (2003), "Artificial neural network for the selection of buildable structural systems", Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 263-71.
4. Barrett, P. (2003), "Hybrid concrete: improved processes and performance", Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Structures and Buildings, Vol. 156 No. SB2, pp. 193-203.
5. Bottom, C., McGreal, S. and Heaney, G. (1997), "Evaluating office environments using tenant organization perceptions", Facilities, Vol. 15 Nos 7/8, pp. 195-203.
6. BRE (2000a), Housing Quality Indicators, available at: www.hqiuk.com/ (accessed May 2003)
7. BRE (2000b), The M4I Sustainability Indicator Assessment Tool, available at: www.m4i.org.uk/m4i/toolkits/sustainability/sustain.asp (accessed May 2003)
8. BRE (2001), BREEAM Offices 2003: Design and Procurement Assessment Checklist, available at http://products.bre.co.uk/breeam/BREEAM_May2003/pdf%20documents/ DPPredictionChecklist2003.pdf (accessed May 2003)
9. Bryman, A. and Cramer, D. (2004), "Constructing variables", in Hardy, M. and Bryman, A. (Eds), Handbook of Data Analysis, Sage Publications, London.
10. Carpenter, C.L. and Oloufa, A.A. (1995), "Post occupancy evaluation of buildings and development of facility performance criteria", Journal of Architectural Engineering, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 77-81.
11. CIC (2002), Design Quality Indicator Questionnaire, Construction Industry Council, London.
12. Cohen, R., Standeven, M., Bordass, B. and Leaman, A. (2001), "Assessing building performance in use 1: the Probe process", Building Research and Information, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 85-102.
13. Construction Best Practice Programme (2003), available at: www.cbpp.org.uk/ (accessed October 2003)
14. Douglas, J. (1994), "Developments in appraising the total performance of buildings", Structural Survey, Vol. 12 No. 6, pp. 10-15.
15. DTI, BRE and CIRIA (2003), Environment Key Performance Indicators, available at: www.cbpp.org.uk/news/artide.jsp?id =1716 and www.cbpp.org.uk/resourcecentre/publications/kpi.jsp (accessed August 2003)
16. Egan, J. (1998), Rethinking Construction, The report of the Construction Task Force on the scope for improving quality and efficiency in UK construction. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London.
17. Egan, J. (2002), Accelerating Change, a report by Strategic Forum for Construction chaired by Sir John Egan.
18. Freedman, S. (2001), "Design factors influencing the aesthetics of architectural precast concrete", PCI Journal, Vol. 46 No. 2, pp. 44-60.
19. Gann, D.M., Salter, A.J. and Whyte, J.K. (2003), "Design quality indicator as a tool for thinking", Building Research and Information, Vol. 31 No. 5, pp. 318-33.
20. Gibb, A.G.F. (1999), Off-site Fabrication: Prefabrication, Pre-assembly and Modularisation, Whittles Publishing, Caithness.
21. Glass, J. (2002), Best Practice Guidance on Hybrid Concrete Construction, Work stage 2: Practitioner Interviews, unpublished research report, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford.
22. Glass, J. (2004), "A best practice process model for hybrid concrete construction", Construction Management and Economics (under review).
23. Glass, J. and Baiche, B. (2001), "Perceptions of hybrid concrete construction in the UK construction industry", Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 67-77.
24. Goodchild, C.H. (1995), Hybrid Concrete Construction: Combining Structural Materials for Speed, Quality and Economy in Buildings, British Cement Association, Berkshire.
25. Goodchild, C.H. (2001), Hybrid Concrete Construction for the UK Market Final Report on Research into Using Combinations of In-situ and Precast Concrete in Structural Frames to Achieve Better Value for UK Customers, Reinforced Concrete Council, Crowthorne.
26. Hinze, J. and Wiegand, F. (1992), "Role of designers in construction worker safety", Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 118 No. 4, pp. 677-84.
27. Idrus, A.B. and Newman, J.B. (2002), "Construction related factors influencing the choice of concrete floor systems", Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 20, pp. 13-19.
28. Kompass (1999-2000), Register of British Industry and Commerce, Kompass Publisher Ltd.
29. KPI Working Group (2000), KPI Report for the Minister for Construction, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London.
30. Latham, M. (1994), Constructing the Team, Final report of the government/industry review of procurement and contractual arrangements in the United Kingdom construction industry, HMSO, Department of Environment, London.
31. Liu, A.M.M. (1999), "Residential satisfaction in housing estates: a Hong Kong perspective", Automation in Construction, Vol. 8, pp. 511-24.
32. Movement for Innovation/ M4I (2003), available at: www.m4i.org.uk/m4i/ (accessed October 2003)
33. Preiser, W.F.E. (1995), "Post-occupancy evaluation: how to make buildings work better", Facilities, Vol. 13 No. 11, pp. 19-28.
34. Preiser, W.F.E. and Schramm, U. (2002), "Intelligent office building performance evaluation", Facilities, Vol. 20 Nos 7/8, pp. 279-87.
35. Sanders, P.A. and Collins, B.L. (1995), Post-Occupancy Evaluation of the Forrestal Building, Report prepared for US Department of Energy by US Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Building and Fire Research Laboratory, Gaithersburg, available at: http://fire.nist.gov/bfrlpubs/build95/PDF/b95080.pdf (accessed May 2003)
36. Soetanto, R. (2002), "Modelling satisfaction for main participants of the construction project coalition: a study of mutual performance assessment", Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton.
37. Sustainability Working Group (2001), Environmental Performance Indicators for Sustainable Construction, available at: www.m4i.org.uk/rc/publications/reports/m4i_epi_report2001.pdf (accessed May 2003)
38. Toole, T.M. (1994) "Task and environmental uncertainty and the adoption of technological innovations by home builders", unpublished PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.