Viewer-external frames of reference in the mental transformation of 3-D objects

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 67, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 1269-1279

  Waszak, Florian ^a,b   Brewing, Knut ^c   Mausfeld, Rainer ^d  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN COGNITIVE AND BRAIN SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^c JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 32644445632     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193558     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. ASCH, S. E., & WITKIN, H. A. (1948). Studies in space orientation: II. Perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 455-477.
2. AUTODESK, INC. (2000). 3D Studio Max [Computer software]. San Rafael, CA: Author.
3. BANKS, M. S., & STOLARZ, S. J. (1975). The effect of head tilt on meridional differences in acuity: Implications for orientation constancy. Perception & Psychophysics, 17, 17-22.
4. BIEDERMAN, I. (1972). Perceiving real-world scenes. Science, 177, 77-80.
5. BIEDERMAN, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
6. BLANZ, V., TARR, M. J., & BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (1999). What object attributes determine canonical views? Perception, 28, 575-599.
7. BÜLTHOFF, H. H., & EDELMAN, S. (1992). Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 89, 60-64.
8. BÜLTHOFF, H. H., & EDELMAN, S. (1993). Evaluating object recognition theories by computer graphics psychophysics. In T. A. Poggio & D. A. Glaser (Eds.), Exploring brain functions: Models in neuroscience(pp. 139-164). New York: Wiley.
9. BÜLTHOFF, H. H., EDELMAN, S., & TARR, M. J. (1995). How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? Cerebral Cortex, 3, 247-260.
10. CARPENTER, M., & PROFFITT, D. R. (2001). Comparing viewer and array mental rotations in different planes. Memory & Cognition, 29, 441-448.
11. COOPER, L. A. (1976). Demonstration of a mental analog of an external rotation. Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 296-302.
12. CORBALLIS, M. C., NAGOURNEY, B. A., SHETZER, L. I., & STEFANATOS, G. (1978). Mental rotation under head tilt: Factors influencing the location of the subjective reference frame. Perception & Psychophysics, 24, 263-273.
13. CORBALLIS, M. C., & ROLDAN, C. E. (1975). Detection of symmetry as a function of angular orientation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 1, 221-230.
14. CORBALLIS, M. C., ZBRODOFF, J., & ROLDAN, C. E. (1976). What's up in mental rotation? Perception & Psychophysics, 19, 525-530.
15. CREF.M, S. H., WRAGA, M., & PROFFITT, D. R. (2001). Imagining physically impossible self-rotations: Geometry is more important than gravity. Cognition, 81, 41-64.
16. DREWING, K., WASZAK, F., & MAUSFELD, R. (1997). Untersuchungen zu Struktur und Referenz richtungsabhängiger Effekte perspektivenneutralisierender Operationen. In W. Krause, U. Kotkamp, & R. Goertz (Eds.), Proceedings der 3. Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Kognitionswissenschaften (pp. 25-26). Jena: Friedrich-Schiller-Universität.
17. EDELMAN, S., & BÜLTHOFF, H. H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects. Vision Research, 32, 2385-2400.
18. GAUTHIER, I., HAYWARD, W. G., TARR, M. J., ANDERSON, A. W., SKUDLARSKI, P., & GORE, J. C. (2002). BOLD activity during mental rotation and viewpoint-dependent object recognition. Neuron, 34, 161-171.
19. GILLAM, B., & MCGRATH, D. (1979). Orientation relative to the retina determines perceptual organization. Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 177-181.
20. HAYWARD, W. G., & TARR, M. J. (1997). Testing conditions for view-point invariance in object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 1511-1521.
21. HAYWARD, W. G., & WILLIAMS, P. (2000). Viewpoint dependence and object discriminability. Psychological Science, 11, 7-12.
22. HINTON, G. E., & PARSONS, L. M. (1981). Frames of reference and mental imagery. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 261-277). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. HINTON, G. E., & PARSONS, L. M. (1988). Scene-based and viewer-centered representations for comparing shapes. Cognition, 30, 1-35.
24. HOCK, H. S., & SULLIVAN, M. (1981). Alternative spatial reference systems: Intentional vs. incidental learning. Perception & Psychophysics, 29, 467-474.
25. HUMMEL, J. E., & BIEDERMAN, I. (1992). Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. Psychological Review, 99, 480-517.
26. HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1983). Reference frames and shape perception. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 151-196.
27. JOLICœUR, P. (1988). Mental rotation and the identification of disoriented objects. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42, 461-478.
28. JOLICœUR, P. (1990). Identification of disoriented objects: A dual-systems theory. Mind & Language, 5, 387-410.
29. JOLICœUR, P., & HUMPHREY, G. K. (1998). Perception of rotated two-dimensional and three-dimensional objects and visual shapes. In V. Walsh & J. Kulikowski (Eds.), Perceptual constancy: Why things look as they do (pp. 69-123). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. LARGE, M.-E., MCMULLEN, P. A., & HAMM, J. P. (2003). The role of axes of elongation and symmetry in rotated object naming. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 1-19.
31. LAWSON, R., & HUMPHREYS, G. W. (1998). View-specific effects of depth rotation and foreshortening on the initial recognition and priming of familiar objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 60, 1052-1066.
32. LAWSON, R., HUMPHREYS, G. W., & JOLICœUR, P. (2000). The combined effects of plane disorientation and foreshortening on picture naming: One manipulation or two? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 568-581.
33. LOGOTHETIS, N. K., & PAULS, J. (1995). Psychophysical and physiological evidence for viewer-centered object representations in the primate. Cerebral Cortex, 3, 270-288.
34. MAFFEI, L., & CAMPBELL, F. W. (1970). Neurophysiological localization of the vertical and horizontal visual coordinates in man. Science, 167, 386-387.
35. MARR, D., & NISHIHARA, H. K. (1978). Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Series B, 200, 269-291.
36. MCMULLEN, P. A., & JOLICœUR, P. (1990). The spatial frame of reference in object naming and discrimination of left-right reflections. Memory & Cognition, 18, 99-115.
37. PALMER, S. E. (1989). Reference frames in the perception of shape and orientation. In B. E. Shepp & S. Ballesteros (Eds.), Object perception: Structure and process (pp. 121-163). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
38. PALMER, S. E. (1999). Vision science: Photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. PALMER, S. E., ROSCH, E., & CHASE, P. (1981). Canonical perspective and the perception of objects. In J. Long & A. Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 135-151). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. PARSONS, L. M. (1987). Visual discrimination of abstract mirrorreflected three-dimensional objects at many orientations. Perception & Psychophysics, 42, 49-59.
41. PERRETT, D. I., ORAM, M. W., & ASHBRIDGE, E. (1998). Evidence accumulation in cell populations responsive to faces: An account of generalization of recognition without mental transformations. Cognition, 67, 111-145.
42. POGGIO, T., & EDELMAN, S. (1990). A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects. Nature, 343, 263-266.
43. ROBERTSON, L. C., PALMER, S. E., & GOMEZ, L. M. (1987). Reference frames in mental rotation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 368-379.
44. ROCK, I. (1956). The orientation of forms on the retina and in the environment. American Journal of Psychology, 69, 513-528.
45. ROCK, I., & HEIMER, W. (1957). The effect of retinal and phenomenal orientation on the perception of form. American Journal of Psychology, 70, 493-511.
46. SEKULER, A. B., & SWIMMER, M. B. (2000). Interactions between symmetry and elongation in determining reference frames for object perception. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 42-56.
47. SHEPARD, R. N., & COOPER, L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. SHEPARD, R. N., & METZLER, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
49. SPERLING, G. (1960). The information available in brief visual presentation. Psychological Monographs, 74(11, Whole No. 98), 1-29.
50. TARR, M. J. (1995). Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 55-82.
51. TARR, M. J., & B̈LTHOFF, H. H. (1998). Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine. In M. J. Tarr & H. H. Bülthoff (Eds.), Object recognition in man, monkey, and machine (pp. 1-20). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
52. TARR, M. J., & PINKER, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.
53. ULLMAN, S. (1989). Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition. Cognition, 32, 193-254.
54. ULLMAN, S. (1998). Three-dimensional object recognition based on the combination of views. Cognition, 67, 21-44.
55. ULLMAN, S., & BASRI, R. (1991). Recognition by linear combinations of models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, 13, 992-1006.
56. WADE, N. J. (1973). Orientation and spatial frequency effects on linear afterimages: The retinal reference for selectivity - A supplementary report. Perception & Psychophysics, 14, 384-386.
57. WILSON, K. D., & FARAH, M. J. (2003). When does the visual system use viewpoint-invariant representations during recognition? Cognitive Brain Research, 16, 399-415.
58. WRAGA, M., CREEM, S. H., & PROFFITT, D. R. (1999). The influence of spatial reference frames on imagined object- and viewer rotations. Acta Psychologica, 102, 247-264.
59. WRAGA, M., CREEM, S. H., & PROFFITT, D. R. (2000). Updating displays after imagined object and viewer rotations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 151-168.