The reinvention of public green space

Urban Geography

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 365-384

  Pincetl, Stephanie ^a   Gearin, Elizabeth ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

GIS; Los Angeles; Public urban open space; Regreening; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

GIS; GREENSPACE; PUBLIC SPACE; URBAN PLANNING;

CALIFORNIA; LOS ANGELES; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 32544448802     PISSN: 02723638     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.26.5.365     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. American Forests, 1999, CITY green [computer software]. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Barrette, M., 2000, Anyone searching for examples of innovative land planning wouldn't necessarily look to water and storm water projects. But that could be a mistake. Planning, Vol. 66, No. 8, 14-21.
3. Bass, J. M., 2001, Parks and the city. Planning, Vol. 67, No. 8, 4-9.
4. Bass, J. M., Ewert, A., and Chavez, D. J., 1993, Influence of ethnicity on recreation and natural environment use patterns: Managing recreation sites for ethnic and racial diversity. Environmental Management, Vol. 17, No. 4, 523-529.
5. Beatle, T., 2000, Preserving biodiversity: Challenges for planners. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 66, No. 1, Winter 5-26.
6. Burch, E. L., 2002, Five generations of the Garden City: Tracing Howard's legacy in twentieth-century residential planning. In K.C. Parsons and D. Schuyler, editors, From Garden City to Green City. The Legacy of Ebenezer Howard. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 171-200.
7. Burgess, J., Harrison C. M., and Limb, M., 1988, People, parks and the urban green: A study of popular meanings and values for open spaces in the city. Urban Studies, Vol. 25, 455-473.
8. Carr, D. S. and Williams, D. R., 1993, Understanding the role of ethnicity in outdoor recreation experiences. Journal of Leisure Research, Vol. 25, No. 1, 22-38.
9. City of Los Angeles Planning Department, 2000, Vermont/Western Station Neighborhood Area Plan, CPC 00-1776SP, EIR 94-0212 GPF. Los Angeles, CA: Author, August 10.
10. Cleveland, C. J., 1987, Biophysical economics: Historical perspective and current research trends. Ecological Modeling, Vol. 338, 47-73.
11. Cranz, G., 1982, The Politics of Park Design: A History of Urban Parks in America. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Daily, G., editor, 1997, Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Nature's Ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island.
13. Draper, J., 1996, The art and science of park planning in the United States: Chicago's small parks, 1902-1905. In M. C. Sies and C. Silver, editors, Planning the Twentieth-Century American City. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 98-119.
14. Enlow, C., 2002, Streets as parks, in Seattle, open space is where you find it. Planning, Vol. 68, No. 5, 16-17.
15. Floyd, F. M., 1998, Getting beyond marginality and ethnicity: The challenge for race and ethnic studies in leisure research. Journal of Leisure Research, Vol. 30, No. 1, 3-22.
16. Floyd, F. M., McGuire, F. A., Shinew, K. J., and Noe, F. P., 1994, Race, class, and leisure activity preferences: marginality and ethnicity revisited. Journal of Leisure Research, Vol. 26, No. 2, 158-173.
17. Fulton, W., Pendall, R., Nguyen, M., and Harrison, A., 2001, Who Sprawls Most? How Growth Patterns Differ Across the U.S. The Brookings Institution Survey Series. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
18. Gearin, E. and Kahle, C., 2006, Youth perceptions of Urban Nature: A Focus Group Study in Los Angeles. Children, Youth, and Environment, Vol. 16, No. 1.
19. Greenhalgh, L. and Worpole, K., 1995, Park Life: Urban Parks and Social Renewal. A Report by Comedia in Association with Demos, Da Costa, London. Gloucester, UK: Comedia.
20. Halprin, L., 1979, The collective perception of cities. In Lisa Taylor, editor, Urban Open Spaces. New York, NY: Cooper-Hewitt Museum and the Smithsonian Institution, 3.
21. Harvey, D., 2003, Paris, Capital of Modernity. New York, NY: Routledge.
22. Heynen, N. C., 2003, The scalar production of injustice within the urban forest. Antipode, Vol. 35, Issue 5, 980-998.
23. Hiltzik, M., 2003, It doesn't take a genius - or a recall candidate - to see the flaws in Proposition 13. Los Angeles Times, August 21, C-1, 1-2.
24. Hise, G. and Deverell, W., 2000, Eden By Design, The 1930 Olmsted-Bartholomew Plan for the Los Angeles Region. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
25. Hutchison, R., 1987, Ethnicity and urban recreation: Whites, blacks, and hispanics in Chicago's public parks. Journal of Leisure Research, Vol. 19, No. 3, 205-222.
26. Ingrassia, R., 2000, Wasteland to waterfront. Planning, Vol 66, No. 5, 20.
27. Kayden, J., 2000, Plaza suite. Planning, Vol. 66, No. 3, March, 16-19.
28. Longcore, T., Li, C., and Wilson, J. P., 2004, Applicability of CITY green urban ecosystem analysis software to a densely built urban neighborhood, Urban Geography, Vol. 25, 173-186.
29. Loukaitou-Sideris, A. and Stieglitz, O., 2001, Children in Los Angeles Parks: A study of equity, quality, and children satisfaction with neighborhood parks. Town Planning Review, Vol. 73, No. 4, 467-488.
30. Markowitz, M., 2003, Riverfront revival. Planning, Vol. 69, No. 4, 36-38.
31. Miller, L., 1995, GIS branches into urban forestry. American City and County, Vol. 110, 35.
32. National Parks and Recreation Association, 2000, National Park Land Standards, 4-18. In Wolch, J., Wilson, J. P., and Fehrenbach, J., editors. Parks and Park Funding in Los Angeles: An Equity Mapping Analysis. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California, GIS Research Laboratory and Sustainable Cities Program.
33. Payne, L. L., Mowen, A. J., and Orsega-Smith, E., 2002, An examination of park preferences and behaviors among urban residents: the role of residential location, race, and age. Leisure Sciences, Vol. 24, 181-198.
34. Pincetl, S., 2003, Non-profit and park provision in Los Angeles: an exploration of the rise of governance approaches to the provision of local services. Social Science Quarterly, December. Vol. 84, No. 2,979-1001.
35. Pincetl, S., 1994, Rethinking citizenship, political organizing among Latino immigrants in Los Angeles. Planning and Environment A, Vol. 26, 895-914.
36. Pincetl, S., 1999, Transforming California, A Political History of Land Use and Development. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
37. Pincetl, S., Wolch, J., Wilson, J. P., and Longcore, T., 2003, Towards a Sustainable Los Angeles: A "Nature's Services" Approach: A Second Year Report to the John Randolph Haynes and Dora Haynes Foundation. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California Center for Sustainable Cities.
38. Platt, K., 2000, Going green, tips on creating urban greenways. Planning, Vol. 66, No. 8, 18-21.
39. Press, D., 2002, Saving Open Space. The Politics of Local Preservation in California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
40. Ramsey, C., 2001, Getting some green to sprout a median on Larchmont Boulevard. Los Angeles Times, E 1,5, September 13.
41. Rappleye, C., 2004, Parks and wreck. Los Angeles, City Beat, February, p. 3.
42. Rees, W. E., 1995, Achieving sustainability: reform or transformation? Journal of Planning Literature, Vol. 9, No. 4, 343-361.
43. Rome, A., 2001, The Bulldozer and the Countryside, Suburban Sprawl and the Rise of American Environmentalism. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
44. Rogers, P., 2002, Latinos take lead on environmental issues, voting shows emphasis shifting to inner-city needs. San Jose Mercury News, March 10, p. Al.
45. Schrag, P., 1998, Paradise Lost, California's Experience, America's Future. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
46. Schuyler, D., 1986, The New Urban Landscape, The Redefinition of City Form in Nineteenth-Century America. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
47. Staeheli, L. A., Kodras, J. E., and Flint, C., 1997, State devolution in America, implications for a diverse society. Urban Affairs Annual Reviews, Vol. 48, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48. Stone, C., 2001, The Atlanta experience re-examined: the link between agenda and regime change. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 25, No. 1, 20-34.
49. Swyngedouw, E. and Heynen, N. C., 2003, Urban political ecology, justice and the politics of scale. Antipode, Vol. 34, Issue 5, 898-918.
50. Thompson, L., 2001, The long good buy. How to plan, fund and complete a multijurisdictional recreation corridor. Planning Magazine, Vol. 67, No. 5, 4-9.
51. Tinsley, H. E. A., Tinsley, D. J., and Croskeys, D. E., 2002, Park usage, social milieu, and psychosocial benefits of park use reported by older urban park users from four ethnic groups. Leisure Sciences, Vol. 24, 199-218.
52. Wolch, J., Wilson, J. P., and Fehrenbach, J., 2002, Parks and Park Funding in Los Angeles: An Equity Mapping Analysis. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory and Sustainable Cities Program.
53. Young, T., 1995, Modern urban parks. The Geographical Review, Vol. 85, 535-551.