A spatially explicit resource-based approach for managing stream fishes in riverscapes

Environmental Management

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 322-335

  Le Pichon, Céline L E ^a   Gorges, Guillaume ^a   Boët, Philippe ^a   Baudry, Jacques ^a   Goreaud, François ^b   Faure, Thierry ^b  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

^b Cemagref   (France)

Author keywords

Barbus barbus; Complementation; Fragmentation; Landscape ecology; Resource habitat mapping; Restoration; Spatial pattern analysis; Stream fishes

Indexed keywords

COSTS; ECOLOGY; FISHERIES; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; STREAM FLOW;

FRAGMENTATION; RIVERSCAPES; STREAM FISHES;

RIVERS;

FISH; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; STREAM;

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; CYPRINIFORMES; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FEEDING; FISH; FRANCE; HABITAT PATCHINESS; NONHUMAN; REVIEW; SPAWNING; STREAM (RIVER);

ANIMALS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DIET; ECOLOGY; FISHES; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REPRODUCTION; RIVERS;

BARBUS BARBUS; CYPRINIDAE; CYPRINIFORMES; PISCES;

EID: 32444443531     PISSN: 0364152X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-005-0027-3     Document Type: Review

References (95)

1. Adriaensen, F., J. P. Chardon, G. De Blust, E. Swinnen, S. Villalba, H. Gulinck, and E. Matthysen. 2003. The application of "least-cost" modelling as a functional landscape model. Landscape and Urban Planning 64:233-247.
2. Allan, J. D. 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: The influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 35:257-284.
3. Amoros, C., and G. Bornette. 2002. Connectivity and biocomplexity in waterbodies of riverine floodplains. Freshwater Biology 47:761-776.
4. Baguette, M., and G. Mennechez. 2004. Resource and habitat patches, landscape ecology and metapopulation biology: A consensual viewpoint. Oikos 106:399-403.
5. Baras, E. 1992. A study of time and space utilisation strategies in the common barbel Barbus barbus (L.). Cahiers d'Ethologie 12:125-442.
6. Baras, E. 1997. Environmental determinants of residence area selection by Barbus barbus in the river Ourthe. Aquatic Living Resources 10:195-206.
7. Baras, E., H. Lambert, and J. C. Philippart. 1994. A comprehensive assessment of the failure of Barbus barbus spawning migrations through a fish pass in the canalized river Meuse (Belgium). Aquatic Living Resources 7:181-189.
8. Baudry, J., H. Boussard, and N. Schermann 2005. CHLOÉ 3.0: Freeware of multi-scales analyses on ASCII raster files. Rennes, INRA, SAD-Armorique. Available from (hup://www.rennes.inra.fr/sad/tools/indexoutil. htm).
9. Bayley, P. B., and H. W. Li. 1992. Riverine fishes. Pages 251-281 in P. Calow, and G. E. Petts (eds.), The rivers handbook: Hydrological and ecological principles. Blackwell, Oxford.
10. Baxter, C. V. 2002. Fish movement and assemblage dynamics in a Pacific northwest riverscape. PhD dissertation. Oregon State University, Corvallis.
11. Boët, P., J. Belliard, R. Berrebi dit Thomas, and E. Tales. 1999. Multiple human impacts by the city of Paris on fish communities in the Seine river basin, France. Hydrobiologia 410:59-68.
12. Bretschko, G. 1995. River/land ecotones: Scales and patterns. Hydrobiologia 303:83-91.
13. Casselman, J. M., and C. A. Lewis. 1996. Habitat requirements of northern pike (Esox lucius). Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53:161-174.
14. Cowx, I. G., and R. L. Welcomme. 1998. Rehabilitation of rivers for fish. Fishing News Books.
15. Dauble, D. D., R. L. Johnson, and A. P. Garcia. 1999. Fall Chinook salmon spawning in the tailraces of Lower Snake River hydroelectric projects. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 128:672-679.
16. Dennis, R. L. H., T. G. Shreeve, and H. Van Dyck. 2003. Towards a functional resource-based concept for habitat: A butterfly biology viewpoint. Oikos 102:417-426.
17. Detenbeck, N. E., P. W. DeVore, G. J. Niemi, and A. Lima. 1992. Recovery of temperate-stream fish communities from disturbance: A review of case studies and synthesis of theory. Environmental Management 16:33-53.
18. Dunning, J. B., B. J. Danielson, and H. R. Pulliam. 1992. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65:169-175.
19. Fausch, K. D., C. E. Torgensen, C. V. Baxter, and H. W. Li. 2002. Landscapes to riverscapes: Bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes. BioScience 52:483-498.
20. Fisher, W. L., and F. J. Rahel. 2004. Geographic information systems applications in stream and river fisheries. Pages 49-84 in W. L. Fisher, and F. J. Rahel (eds.), Geographic information systems in fisheries. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
21. Freeman, M. C. 1993. Effects of habitat availability on dispersion of a stream cyprinid. Environmental Biology of Fishes 37:121-130.
22. Frissell, C. A., W. J. Liss, C. E. Warren, and M. D. Hurley. 1986. A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed context. Environmental Management 10:199-214.
23. Gerking, S. D. 1959. The restricted movement offish populations. Biological Review 34:221-242.
24. Gowan, C., and K. D. Fausch. 1996. Mobile brook trout in two high-elevation Colorado streams: Re-evaluating the concept of restricted movement. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 53:1370-1381.
25. Gustafson, E. J. 1998. Quantifying landscape spatial pattern: What is the state of the art? Ecosystems 1:143-156.
26. Gustafson, E. J., and G. R. Parker. 1994. Using an index of habitat patch proximity for landscape design. Landscape and Urban Planning 29:117-130.
27. Hanski, I. 1994. A practical model of metapopulation dynamics. Journal of Animal Ecology 63:151-162.
28. Harris, G., and A. L. Heathwaite. 2005. Inadmissible evidence: Knowledge and prediction in land and riverscapes. Journal of Hydrology 304:3-19.
29. Hawkins, C. P., J. L. Kershner, P. A. Bisson, M. D. Bryant, L. M. Decker, S. V. Gregory, D. A. Mccullough, C. K. Overton, G. H. Reeves, R. J. Steedman, and M. K. Young. 1993. A hierarchical approach to classifying stream habitat features. Fisheries 18:3-12.
30. He, H. S., B. E. DeZonia, and D. J. Mladenoff. 2000. An aggregation index (AI) to quantify spatial patterns of landscapes. Landscape Ecology 15:591-601.
31. Hilderbrand, R. H., A. D. Lemly, and C. A. Dolloff. 1999. Habitat sequencing and the importance of discharge in inferences. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 19:198-202.
32. Hirzel, A., and A. Guisan. 2002. Which is the optimal sampling strategy for habitat suitability modelling. Ecological Modelling 157:331-341.
33. Huber, M., and A. Kirchhofer. 1998. Radio telemetry as a tool to study habitat use of nase (Chondrostoma nasus L.) in medium-sized rivers. Hydrobiologia 372:309-319.
34. Jochem, R., B. J. H. Koolstra, and J. P. Chardon. 2002. LARCH: An ecological application of GIS in river studies. Pages 63-74 in R. S. E. W. Leuven, I. Poudevigne, and R. M. Teew (eds.), Application of geographic information systems and remote sensing in river studies. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands.
35. Johnson, L. B., and S. H. Gage. 1997. Landscape approaches to the analysis of aquatic ecosystems. Freshwater Biology 37:113-132.
36. Johnston, C. E. 2000. Movement patterns of imperiled blue shiners (Pisces : Cyprinidae) among habitat patches. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 9:170-176.
37. Joly, P., C. Morand, and A. Cohas. 2003. Habitat fragmentation and amphibian conservation: Building a tool for assessing landscape matrix connectivity. Comptes Rendus Biologies 326:132-139.
38. Kelly, N. M., D. Field, F. A. Cross, and R. Emmet. 1998. Remote sensing of forest-clearing effects on essential fish habitat of Pacific salmon. Pages 252-267 in L. R. Benaka (ed.), Fish habitat: Essential Fish. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
39. Knaapen, J. P., M. Scheffer, and B. Harms. 1992. Estimating habitat isolation in landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 23:1-16.
40. Kocik, J. F., and C. P. Ferreri. 1998. Juvenile production variation in salmonids: Population dynamics, habitat, and the role of spatial relationships. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 55:191-200.
41. Kotliar, N. B., and J. A. Wiens. 1990. Multiple scales of patchiness and patch structure: A hierarchical framework for the study of heterogeneity. Oikos 59:253-260.
42. Leuven, R. S. E. W., and I. Poudevigne. 2002. Riverine landscape dynamics and ecological risk assessment. Freshwater Biology 47:845-865.
43. Leuven, R. S. E. W., I. Poudevigne, and R. M. Teeuw. 2002. Remote sensing and geographic information systems as emerging tools for riverine habitat and landscape evaluation: From concepts to models. Pages 63-74 in R. S. E. W. Leuven, I. Poudevigne, and R. M. Teew (eds.), Application of geographic information systems and remote sensing in river studies. Backhuys Publishers, Leiden, The Netherlands.
44. Lonzarich, D. G., M. L. Warren, and M. R. E. Lonzarich. 1998. Effects of habitat isolation on the recovery of fish assemblages in experimentally defaunated stream pools in Arkansas. Canadian Journal of Fisheries Aquatic Science 55:2141-2149.
45. Lowe, W. H. 2002. Landscape-scale spatial population dynamics in human-impacted stream systems. Environmental Management 30:225-233.
46. Lucas, M. C., and E. Baras. 2001. Migration of freshwater fishes. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
47. Lucas, M. C., and E. Batley. 1996. Seasonal movements and behaviour of adult barbel Barbus barbus, a riverine cyprinid fish: Implications for river management. Journal of Applied Ecology 33:1345-1358.
48. MacGarigal, K., and B. J. Marks. 1995. FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. General Technical Report PNW-351, USDA Forest Service, Corvallis, OR.
49. Meaden, G. J. 2004. Challenges of using geographic information systems in aquatic environments. Pages 13-48 in W. L. Fisher, and F. J. Rahel (eds.), Geographic information systems in fisheries. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
50. Mertes, L. A. K. 2002. Remote sensing of riverine landscapes. Freshwater Biology 47:799-816.
51. Metzger, J.-P., and H. Décamps. 1997. The structural connectivity threshold: An hypothesis in conservation biology at the landscape scale. Acta Oecologica 18:1-12.
52. Morita, K., and S. Yamamoto. 2002. Effects of habitat fragmentation by damming on the persistence of stream-dwelling charr populations. Conservation Biology 16:1318-1323.
53. Muller, E. 1997. Mapping riparian vegetation along rivers: Old concepts and new methods. Aquatic Botany 58:411-437.
54. O'Neill, R. V., J. R. Krummel, R. H. Gardner, G. Sugihara, B. Jackson, D. L. DeAngelis, B. T. Milne, M. G. Turner, B. Zygmunt, S. W. Christensen, V. H. Dale, and R. L. Graham. 1988. Indices of landscape pattern. Landscape Ecology 1:153-162.
55. Pain, G., J. Baudry, and F. Burel. 2000. LandPop: Un outil d'étude de la structure spatiale des populations animales fragmentées. Géomatique 10:89-106.
56. Pedroli, B., G. de Blust, K. Looy, and S. van Rooij. 2002. Setting targets in strategies for river restoration. Landscape Ecology 17:5-18.
57. Petts, G. E., and C. Amoros. 1996. Fluvial hydrosystems. Chapman & Hall, London.
58. Plotnick, R. E., R. H. Gardner, and R. V. O'Neill. 1993. Lacunarity indices as measures of landscape texture. Landscape Ecology 8:201-211.
59. Poizat, G., and D. Pont. 1996. Multi-scale approach to species-habitat relationships: Juvenile fish in a large river section. Freshwater Biology 36:611-622.
60. Poole, G. C. 2002. Fluvial landscape ecology: Addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuum. Freshwater Biology 47:641-660.
61. Pretty, J. L., S. C. Harrison, D. J. Shepherd, C. Smith, A. G. Hildrew, and R. D. Hey. 2003. River rehabilitation and fish populations: Assessing the benefit of instream structures. Journal of Applied Ecology 40:251-265.
62. Pringle, C. M., R. J. Naiman, G. Bretschko, J. R. Karr, M. W. Oswood, J. R. Webster, R. L. Welcomme, and M. J. Winterbourn. 1988. Patch dynamics in lotic systems: The stream as a mosaic. Journal of North American Benthological Society 7:503-524.
63. Puestow, T. M., A. Simms, and K. Butler. 2001. Mapping of salmon habitat parameters using airborne imagery and digital ancillary data. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 67:309-317.
64. Rabeni, C. F., and R. B. Jacobson. 1993. The importance of fluvial hydraulics to fish-habitat restoration in low-gradient alluvial streams. Freshwater Biology 29:211-220.
65. Rabeni, C. F., and S. P. Sowa. 2002. A landscape approach to managing the biota of streams and rivers. Pages 114-142 in J. Liu, and W. Taylor (eds.), Integrating landscape ecology into natural resource management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
66. Ray, N., A. Lehmann, and P. Joly. 2002. Modeling spatial distribution of amphibian populations: A GIS approach based on habitat matrix permeability. Biodiversity and Conservation 11:2143-2165.
67. Richards, K., J. Brasington, and F. Hughes. 2002. Geomorphic dynamics of floodplains: Ecological implications and a potential modelling strategy. Freshwater Biology 47:559-579.
68. Rubec, P. J., M. S. Coyne, R. H. McMichael, Jr., and M. E. Monaco. 1998. Spatial methods being developed in Florida to determine essential fish habitat. Fisheries 23:21-25.
69. Rushton, S. P., P. W. W. Lurz, R. Fuller, and P. J. Garson. 1997. Modelling the distribution of the red and grey squirrel at the landscape scale: A combined GIS and population dynamics approach. Journal of Applied Ecology 34:1137-1154.
70. Saad, Y., and M. Sosonkina. 1999. Distributed schur complement techniques for general sparse linear systems. Journal of Science Computing 21:1337-1356.
71. Schermann, N., and J. Baudry. 2002. Analyse descriptive multi-échelle de la structure d'un paysage: Application à la mosaïque d'occupation du sol d'un territoire agricole dans le bocage breton. Géomatique 12:169-186.
72. Schiemer, F., and H. Waidbacher. 1992. Strategies for conservation of a danubian fish fauna. Pages 363-382 in P. J. Boon, P. Calow, and G. E. Petts (eds.), River conservation and management. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
73. Schiemer, F., M. Zalewski, and J. E. Thorpe. 1995. Land/inland water ecotones: Intermediate habitats critical for conservation and management. Hydrobiologia 303:259-264.
74. Schilling, K. E., and C. F. Wolter. 2000. Application of GPS and GIS to map channel features in Walnut Creek, Iowa. Journal of American Water Resources Association 36:1423-1434.
75. Schlosser, I. J. 1991. Stream fish ecology: A landscape perspective. BioScience 41:704-712.
76. Schlosser, I. J. 1995. Critical landscape attributes that influence fish population dyamics in headwater streams. Hydrobiologia 303:71-81.
77. Schneider, D. C. 2001. The rise of the concept of scale in ecology. BioScience 51:545-553.
78. Smith, C. 1991. Social behaviour, homing and migration. Pages 509-529 in I. J. Winfield, and J. S. Nelson (eds.), Cyprinid fishes: Systematics, biology and exploitation. Chapman & Hall, London.
79. Smithson, E. B., and C. E. Johnston. 1999. Movement patterns of stream fishes in a Ouachita Highlands stream: An examination of the restricted movement paradigm. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 128:847-853.
80. Spruell, P., B. E. Rieman, K. L. Knudsen, F. M. Utter, and F. W. Allendorf. 1999. Genetic population structure within streams: Microsatellite analysis of bull trout populations. Ecology of Freshwater Fish 8:114-121.
81. Srivastava, S. K., U. K. Sarkar, and A. G. Ponniah. 2001. Arrangement of habitat information on a GIS platform to identify optimum and degraded areas of golden mahseer (Tor putitora, Hamilton) habitat. Pages 302-314 in T. Nishida, P. J. Kailola, and C. E. Hollingworth (eds.), Proceeding of the first international symposium on geographic information systems (GIS) in Fishery Science. Fishery GIS Research Group, Saitama, Japan.
82. Suarez-Seoane, S., and J. Baudry. 2002. Scale dependence of spatial patterns and cartography on the detection of landscape change: Relationships with species' perception. Ecography 25:499-511.
83. Tiffan, K. F., R. D. Garland, and D. W. Rondorf. 2002. Quantifying flow-dependent changes in subyearling fall chinook salmon rearing habitat using two-dimensional spatially explicit modeling. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 22:713-726.
84. Toepfer, C. S., W. L. Fischer, and W. D. Warde. 2000. A multistage approach to estimate fish abundance in streams using geographic information systems. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 20:634-645.
85. Torgersen, C. E. 2002. A geographical framework for assessing longitudinal patterns in stream habitat and fish distribution. PhD, Oregon State University.
86. Townsend, C. R. 1989. The patch dynamics concept of stream community ecology. Journal of North American Benthological Society 8:36-50.
87. Vos, C., J. Verboom, P. F. M. Opdam, and C. J. F. TerBraak. 2001. Toward ecologically scaled landscape indices. American Naturalist 157:24-41.
88. Vuilleumier, S., and R. Prelaz-Droux. 2002. Map of ecological networks for landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 58:157-170.
89. Ward, J. V. 1998. Riverine landscapes: Biodiversity patterns, disturbance regimes, and aquatic conservation. Biological Conservation 83:269-278.
90. Ward, J. V., and J. A. Stanford. 1995. The serial discontinuity concept: Extending the model to floodplain rivers. Regulated River. Research and Management 10:159-168.
91. Ward, J. V., F. Malard, and K. Tockner. 2002. Landscape ecology: A framework for integrating pattern and process in river corridors. Landscape Ecology 17:35-45.
92. Watzin, M. C., and A. W. McIntosh. 1999. Aquatic ecosystems in agricultural landscapes: A review of ecological indicators and achievable ecological outcomes. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 54:636-644.
93. Whited, D., J. A. Stanford, and J. S. Kimball. 2002. Application of airborne multispectral digital imagery to quantify riverine habitats at different base flows. River Research and Applications 18:583-594.
94. Wiens, J. A. 2002. Riverine landscapes: Taking landscape ecology into the water. Freshwater Biology 47:501-515.
95. Wu, J. G., and O. L. Loucks. 1995. From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: A paradigm shift in ecology. Quarterly Review of Biology 70:439-466.