Conventional, closed haemorrhoidectomy versus resection with a circular stapler: A prospective randomized study;Hämorrhoidektomie: Konventionelle exzision versus resektion mit dem klammernahtgerät. Prospektiv, randomisierte studie

Deutsche Medizinische Wochenschrift

Volumn 129, Issue 30, 2004, Pages 1611-1617

  Hasse, C ^a,c   Sitter, H ^a   Brune, M ^a   Wollenteit, I ^b   Lorenz, W ^a   Rothmund, M ^a  

^a PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

^b Klinik fur Allgemeinchirurgie   (Germany)

^c Coloproktologie Praxisklinik ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLEEDING; DETERIORATION; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HUMAN; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZATION; REDUCTION; STANDARDIZATION; STAPLER; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; WOUND; WOUND CLOSURE;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; FECAL INCONTINENCE; FEMALE; HEMORRHOIDS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; SURGICAL STAPLERS; SURGICAL STAPLING; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 3242878075     PISSN: 00120472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-829001     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD. A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 1996; 39: 681-685
2. Brown SR, Ballan K, Ho E, Ho Fams YH, Seow-Choen F. Stapled mucosectomy for acute thrombosed circumferentially prolapsed piled: a prospective randomised comparison with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. Colorectal Disease 2001; 3: 175-178
3. Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJM, Nystrom P-O, Kamm MA, Phillips RKS. Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000; 356: 730-733
4. Corman ML. Haemorrhoids. 4th ed (Hrsg). Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, In: Corman ML. Colon and rectal surgery. 1998: 64-72
5. Fansler WA, Anderson JK. A plastic operation for certain types of hemorrhoids. JAMA 1933; 101: 1064-1072
6. Farinetti A, Saviano M. Surgical treatment of haemorrhoids disease by circular stapler. Analysis of costs. Minerva Chir 2000; 55: 401-407
7. Ferguson JA, Heaton JR. Closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1959; 2: 176
8. Friedman LM, Furberg CD, DeMets DL. Sample size. 2nd ed (Hrsg). Littleton: PSG Publishing Company INC, Littleton PSG Publishing Company INC, In: Friedman LM, Furberg CD, DeMets DL. Fundamentals of clinical trials. 1985: 83-107
9. Ganio E, Altomare F, Gabrielli A, Milito G, Canuti S. Prospective randomised multicentre trial comparing stapled with open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 669-674
10. Helmy MA. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy. J Egypt Parasit 2000; 30: 951-958
11. Herold A, Kirsch JJ. Komplikationen nach Stapler-Hämorrhoidektomie. Ergebnisse einer Umfrage in Deutschland. Coloproktology 2001; 23: 8-16
12. Ho Y-H, Cheong W-K, Tsabg C et al. Stapled hemorrhoidectomy - cost and effectiveness randomized controlled trial including incontinence scoring anorectal manometry and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months. Dis Colon Rectum 2000; 43: 1666-1675
13. Ho Y-H, Seow-Choen F, Tan M, Leong AF. Randomized controlled trial of open and closed haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 1997; 84: 1729-1730
14. Jorge JMN, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993; 36: 77-84
15. Keighley MRB, Williams NS. Haemorrhoids. 1st ed (Hrsg). London, Philadelphia, Toronto, Sydney, Tokyo: Saunders Company Ltd, In: Keighley MRB, Williams NS. Surgery of the Anus, Rectum and Colon. 1998: 78-84
16. Khalil KH, O'Bichere A, Sellu D. Randomized clinical trial of sutured versus stapled closed haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 1352-1355
17. Khubchandani IT, Trimpi HD, Sheets JA. Closed hemorrhoidectomy with local anesthesia. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1972; 135: 955-957
18. Loder PB. Minor anorectal conditions. 1st ed (Hrsg). London, Philadelphia, Toronto, Sydney, Tokyo: Saunders Company Ltd, In: Phillips RKS. Colorectal Surgery. 1998: 287-297
19. Longo A. Treatment of haemorrhoid disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with circular suturing device: a new procedure. Proceedings of the Sixth World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, 3 June 1998. Bologna: Monduzzi Editore, 1998: 777-784
20. MacRae HM, McLeod RS. Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities. A meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 687-694
21. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Rachel Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey: III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and reliability across diverse patient groups. Medical Care 1994; 32: 40
22. Mehigan BJ, Monson JRT, Hartley JE. Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 355: 782-785
23. Milligan ETC, Morgan CN, Jones LE, Officer R. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal, and operative treatment of haemorrhiods. Lancet 1937; 46: 1119-1124
24. Mortensen N, Romanos J. Hemorrhoids. 1st ed (Hrsg). New York, Edinburgh, London, Madrid, Melbourne, San Francisco, Tokyo: Churchill Livingstone, In: Nicholls RJ, Dozois RR. Surgery of the Colon and Rectum. 1998: 209-231
25. Ortiz H, Marzo J, Armendariz P. Randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus conventional diathermy haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 1376-1381
26. Parks AG. The surgical treatment of Haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1956; 43: 337
27. Roe AM, Bartolo DC, Vellacott KD, Locke-Edmunds J, Mortensen NJ. Submucosal versus ligation excision hemorrhoidectomy: a comparison of anal sensation, anal sphincter manometry and postoperative pain and function. Br J Surg 1987; 74: 948-951
28. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000; 355: 779-781
29. Schmidt MP, Fischbein J, Shatavi H. Stapler-Hämorrhoidektomie versus plastisch-rekonstruktive Verfahren - OP-Verfahren im klinischen Vergleich. Zentralbl Chir 2002; 127: 15-18
30. Shalaby R, Desoky A. Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2001; 88: 1049-1053
31. Smyth EF, Baker RP, Wilken BJ, Hartley JE, White TJ, Monson JR. Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003; 361: 1437-1438
32. Thomson WHF. The nature of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1975; 62: 542-552
33. Jr. Ware JE. How to score the SF-36 health survey, Boston. Medical Outcomes Trust 1994; 27: 134
34. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF 36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care 1992; 30: 473-479
35. Ware JE. SF-36: manual and interpretation guide. Boston: Health Institute. New England Medical Center 1993; 16: 92
36. Wolfe JS, Munoz JJ, Rosin JD. Survey of hemorrhoidectomy practice: open versus closed techniques. Dis Colon Rectum 1979; 22: 536-538