Nader voters in the 2000 Presidential Election: What would they have done without him?

Social Science Journal

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 423-431

  Southwell, Priscilla L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3242797483     PISSN: 03623319     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soscij.2004.04.009     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Abramson P.R. Aldrich J.H. The decline of electoral participation in America American Political Science Review 76 1982 502-521
2. Abramson P.R. Aldrich J. Paolino P. Rohde D.W. Third-party candidates and independent candidates in American politics: Wallace Political Science Quarterly 110 1995 349-368
3. Asbee E. The Also-Rans: Nader, Buchanan and the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Political Quarterly 72 2001 159-169
4. Black J.H. The multicandidate calculus of voting: Application to Canadian Federal Elections American Journal of Political Science 22 1979 609-638
5. Bowler S. Lanoue D.L. Strategic and protest voting for third parties: The case of the Canadian NDP Western Political Quarterly 45 1992 485-500
6. Brody R.A. Sniderman P.M. From life space to polling place British Journal of Political Science 7 1977 337-360
7. Cain B.E. Strategic voting in Britain American Journal of Political Science 22 1978 639-655
8. Chressanthis G.A. Shaffer S.D. Major-party failure and third-party voting in Presidential Elections, 1976-1988 Social Science Quarterly 74 1993 264-273
9. Citrin J. Comment: The political relevance of trust in Government American Political Science Review 68 1974 973-988
10. Clarke H. Acock A. National elections and political attitudes: The case of political efficacy British Journal of Political Science 19 1989 551-562
11. Donovan T. Bowler S. Terrio T. Support for third parties in California American Politics Quarterly 28 2000 50-72
12. Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of Democracy. New York: Harper - Row.
13. Duverger, M., (1967). Political parties. London: Lower and Brydone.
14. Erikson R.S. Why do people vote? Because they are registered American Politics Quarterly 9 1981 259-276
15. Finifter A. Dimensions of political alienation American Political Science Review 65 1970 329-341
16. Katosh J.P. Traugott M.W. Costs and values in the calculus of voting American Journal of Political Science 26 1982 361-376
17. Lacy D. Burden B. The vote-stealing and turnout effects of Ross Perot in the 1992 U.S. Presidential Election American Journal of Political Science 43 1999 233-255
18. McCann, J. A., - Rapoport, R. B. (1999). Heeding the call: An assessment of mobilization with H. Ross Perot's 1992 Presidential Campaign. American Journal of Politics, 43, 1-28.
19. Niemi R.G. Craig S.C. Mattei F. Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study American Political Science Review 85 1991 1407-1441
20. Nownes A.J. Primaries, general elections, and voter turnout: A multinomial logit model of the decision to vote American Politics Quarterly 20 1992 205-226
21. Palfrey, T. A. (1989). Mathematical proof of Duverger's law. In: P.C. Oredshook (Ed.), Models of strategic choice in politics. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
22. Rosenberg L.S. Brody R.A. Participation in political primaries Western Political Quarterly 41 1988 253-273
23. Shaffer S.D. A multivariate explanation of decreasing turnout in Presidential Elections, 1960-1976 American Journal of Political Science 25 1981 68-95
24. Southwell P. Everest M. The electoral consequences of alienation: Nonvoting and third party voting in the 1992 Presidential Race Social Science Journal 35 1998 43-52
25. Verba, S., - Nie, N. (1972). Participation in America. New York: Harper - Row.
26. Verba, S., Nie, N., - Kim, J. (1978). Participation and political equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Verba, S., Schlozman, K., - Brady, H. (1995). Voice and equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.