Support for third parties in California

American Politics Research

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 50-71

  Donovan, Todd ^a   Bowler, Shaun ^b   Terrio, Tammy ^a  

^a WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0010098385     PISSN: 1532673X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1532673X00028001003     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Abramson, P. (1979). Developing party identification: A further examination of life-cycle, generational and period effects. American Journal of Political Science, 23(1), 78-96.
2. Alvarez, R. M., & Nagler, J. (1995). Economics, issues and the Perot candidacy: Voter choice in the 1992 election. American Journal of Political Science, 39(3), 714-744.
3. Alvarez, R. M., & Nagler, J. (1998). When politics and models collide: Estimating models of multiparty elections. American Journal of Political Science, 42(1), 55-96.
4. Bell, C., & Price, C. (1984). California government today: Politics of reform. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
5. Burnham, W. D. (1970). Critical elections and the mainsprings of American politics. New York: Norton.
6. Chaney, C., Alvarez, R. M., & Nagler, J. (1998). Explaining the gender gap in U.S. presidential elections. Political Research Quarterly, 51(2), 311-340.
7. Collet, C. (1993). Bye-bye GOP, ta-ta Dems: California voters flee traditional parties. California Journal, 24(10), 33-37.
8. Collet, C., & Hansen, J. R. (1995, March). The rise of third parties in western states. Paper presented at a meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Portland, OR.
9. Converse, P. (1976). The dynamics of party support. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
10. Converse, P., Miller, W., Rusk, J., & Wolfe, A. (1969). Continuity and change in American politics: Parties and issues in the 1968 election. American Political Science Review, 63(4), 1083-1110.
11. Cox, G. (1997). Making votes count. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Duverger, M. (1959). Political parties. New York: John Wiley.
13. Eiden, J., & Schweitzer, D. (1971). New third party radicalism: The case of the California Peace and Freedom Party. Western Political Quarterly, 24(3), 761-774.
14. Gold, H. (1995). Third party voting in presidential elections: A study of Perot, Anderson and Wallace. Political Research Quarterly, 48(4), 751-774.
15. Jennings, M. K., & Markus, G. (1984). Partisan orientations over the long-haul. American Political Science Review, 78(4), 1000-1018.
16. Lowenstein, D. (1995). Third parties and independent candidates. In D. Lowenstein, Election law: Cases and materials (pp. 391-424). Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
17. Riker, W. (1982). The two-party system and Duverger's law: An essay on the history of political science. American Political Science Review, 76(3), 753-766.
18. Rosenstone, S., Behr, R., & Lazarus, E. (1984). Third parties in America: Citizen response to major party failure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. Shepsle, K., & Bonchek, M. (1997). Analyzing politics: Rationality, behavior and institutions. New York: Norton.
20. Stambough, S. J., & Thorson, G. R. (1995). Anti-incumbency and the 1992 elections: The changing face of presidential coattails. Journal of Politics, 57(1), 210-219.
21. Tolchin, S. (1996). The angry American: How voter rage is changing the nation. Boulder, CO: Westview.
22. Vowels, J. (1995). The politics of electoral reform in New Zealand. International Political Science Review, 16(1), 117-115.