Reliability, cost-effectiveness, and safety of reuse of ancillary devices for ERCP

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 60, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 246-252

  Prat, Frédéric ^a,b   Spieler, Jean François ^a   Paci, Sabine ^a   Pallier, Coralie ^a   Fritsch, Jacques ^a   Daniel Choury, André ^a   Pelletier, Gilles ^a   Raspaud, Sylvie ^a   Nordmann, Patrice ^a   Buffet, Catherine ^a  

^a INSERM   (France)

^b BICÊTRE HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANNULATION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY; HEALTH ECONOMICS; HEPATITIS B; HEPATITIS B VIRUS; HEPATITIS C; HEPATITIS C VIRUS; HUMAN; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MICROBIOLOGICAL EXAMINATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; RISK FACTOR;

CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY, ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; EQUIPMENT REUSE; EQUIPMENT SAFETY; FRANCE; HUMANS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STERILIZATION;

EID: 3242788668     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0016-5107(04)01685-2     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Provenzale D. Economic analysis of endoscopic accessories. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 9:1999;573-586
2. Petersen B.T. Advantages of disposable endoscopic accessories. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 10:2000;341-348
3. Wolfsen H.C. Advantages of reusable accessories. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 10:2000;349-359
4. Furman P.J. Third-party reprocessing of endoscopic accessories. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am. 10:2000;385-392
5. Lee R.M., Vida F., Kozarek R.A., Raltz S.L., Ball T.J., Patterson D.J., et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of reusable double-channel sphincterotome. Gastrointest Endosc. 49:1999;477-482
6. Cohen J., Haber G.B., Kortan P., Dorais A.L., Scheider D.M., Cirocco M., et al. A prospective study of the repeated use of sterilized papillotomes and retrieval baskets for ERCP: quality and cost-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 45:1997;122-127
7. Kozarek R.A., Raltz S.L., Ball T.J., Patterson D.J., Brandabur J.J. Reuse of disposable sphincterotomes for diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a one-year prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 49:1999;39-42
8. Axon A., Kruse A., Urgell R., Struelens M., Petersen C., Spencer K., et al. ESGE guidelines for the reprocessing of accessories in digestive endoscopy. Endoscopy. 28:1996;534-535
9. Yang R., Ng S., Nichol M., Laine L. A cost and performance evaluation of disposable and reusable biopsy forceps in GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 51:2000;266-270
10. Deprez P.H., Horsmans Y., Van Hassel M., Hoang P., Piessevaux H., Geubel A. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps; a prospective cost evaluation. Gastrointest Endosc. 51:2000;262-265
11. Rizzo J., Bernstein D., Gress F. A performance, safety and cost comparison of reusable and disposable endoscopic biopsy forceps: a prospective, randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 51:2000;257-261
12. Lejeune C., Prost P., Michiels C., Roullaud-Guenfoudi M.P., Phelip J.M., Martin L., et al. Disposable versus reusable biopsy forceps. A prospective cost-analysis in the gastrointestinal endoscopy unit of the Dijon University Hospital. [French] Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 25:2001;669-673
13. Carr-Locke DL, Conn MI, Faigel DO, Laing K, Leung JW, Mills MR, et al. Device reprocessing companies. ASGE technology status evaluation, May 1998.
14. Jung M., Beilenhoff U., Pietsch M., Kraft B., Rippin G. Standardized reprocessing of reusable colonoscopy biopsy forceps is effective: results of a German multicenter study. Endoscopy. 35:2003;197-202
15. Wilkinson M., Simmons N., Bramble M., Leicester R., D'Silva J., Boys R., et al. Report of the working party of the endoscopy committee of the British Society of Gastroenterology on the reuse of endoscopic accessories. Gut. 42:1998;304-306
16. Bronowicki J.P., Venard V., Botté C., Monhoven N., Gastin I., Chone L., et al. Patient-to-patient transmission of hepatitis C virus during colonoscopy. N Engl J Med. 337:1997;237-240
17. Langenberg W., Rauws E.A., Oudbier J.H., Tytgat G.N. Patient-to-patient transmission of Campylobacter pylori by fiberoptic gastroduodenoscopy and biopsy. J Infect Dis. 161:1990;507-511
18. Axon A.T.R., Beilenhoff U., Bramble M.G., Ghosh S., Kruse A., Mc Donnell G.E., et al. Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (vCJD) and gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopy. 33:2001;1070-1080
19. Canard J.M., Cellier C., Houcke P., Laurent J., Gorce D., Landi B. Prospective multicenter study comparing a standard reusable sphincterotome with a disposable triple-lumen sphincterotome. Gastrointest Endosc. 51:2000;704-707
20. Drummond M., O'Brien B., Stoddart G., Torrance G. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 2nd ed.:1997;University Press, Oxford
21. Lajonchère J.P. Report of the study group on sterilization of medical devices. Internal report. August 2002;Assistance Publique-Htptaux de Paris, Paris
22. Kozarek R.A. Coming clean on reuse of endoscopic equipment. Gut. 42:1998;155-156