|
Volumn 51, Issue 6, 2000, Pages 704-707
|
Prospective multicenter study comparing a standard reusable sphincterotome with a disposable triple-lumen sphincterotome
a a,b a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CANNULATION;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
COST CONTROL;
DEVICE;
ENDOSCOPIC SPHINCTEROTOMY;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
|
EID: 0034044273
PISSN: 00165107
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1067/mge.2000.105720 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (6)
|
References (8)
|