Spatial variation and density-dependent dispersal in competitive coexistence

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 271, Issue 1547, 2004, Pages 1497-1506

  Amarasekare, Priyanga ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Competition; Density dependent dispersal; Dominance; Pre emption; Source sink dynamics; Spatial variation

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION (ECOLOGY); DISPERSAL; DOMINANCE; EMIGRATION; SOURCE-SINK DYNAMICS; SPATIAL VARIATION;

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY; COMPETITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISPERSION; DOMINANCE BEHAVIOR; EXISTENTIALISM; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MIGRATION; NONHUMAN; POPULATION DENSITY DEPENDENCE; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION ANALYSIS; SPECIES COEXISTENCE;

EID: 3242689009     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2004.2696     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Aars, J. & Ims, R. A. 2000 Population dynamic and genetic consequences of spatial density-dependent dispersal in patchy populations. Am. Nat. 155, 252-265.
2. Amarasekare, P. 2004 The role of density-dependent dispersal in single species source-sink dynamics. J. Theor. Biol. 226, 159-168.
3. Amarasekare, P. & Nisbet, R. 2001 Spatial heterogeneity, source-sink dynamics and the local coexistence of competing species. Am. Nat. 158, 572-584.
4. Birkhead, T. R. 1977 The effect of habitat and density on breeding success of the common guillemot (Uria aalge). J. Anim. Ecol. 46, 751-764.
5. Codeco, C. T. & Grover, J. P. 2001 Competition along a spatial gradient of resource supply: a microbial experimental model. Am. Nat. 157, 300-315.
6. Denno, R. F. & Peterson, M. A. 1995 Density-dependent dispersal and its consequences for population dynamics. In Population dynamics (ed. N. Cappuccino & P. W. Price), pp. 113-130. San Diego, CA: Academic.
7. Diffendorfer, J. E. 1998 Testing models of source-sink dynamics and balanced dispersal. Oikos 81, 417-433.
8. Doncaster, C. P., Colbert, J., Doligez, B., Gustafsson, L. & Danchin, E. 1997 Balanced dispersal between spatially varying local populations: an alternative to the source-sink model. Am. Nat. 150, 424-445.
9. Fonseca, D. M. & Hart, D. D. 1996 Density-dependent dispersal of black fly neonates is mediated by flow. Oikos 75, 49-58.
10. Herzig, A. L. 1995 Effects of population density on long-distance dispersal in the goldenrod beetle Trirhabda virgata. Ecology 76, 2044-2054.
11. Holling, C. S. 1959 Some characteristics of simple types of predation and parasitism. Can. Entomol. 91, 385-398.
12. Howe, R. W., Davis, G. J. & Mosca, V. 1991 The demographic significance of sink populations. Biol. Conserv. 57, 239-255.
13. Hubbell, S. P. 2001 The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography: monographs in population biology. Princeton University Press.
14. Kishimoto, K. 1990 Coexistence of any number of species in the Lotka-Volterra competitive system over two patches. Theor. Popul. Biol. 38, 149-158.
15. Kuussaari, M., Sacceri, I., Camara, M. & Hanski, I. 1998 Allee effect and population dynamics in the Glanville fritillary butterfly. Oikos 82, 384-392.
16. Lamont, B. B., Klinkhamer, P. G. L. & Witkowski, E. T. F. 1993 Population fragmentation may reduce fertility to zero in Banksia goodii: a demonstration of the Allee effect. Oecologia 94, 446-450.
17. Levin, S. A. 1974 Dispersion and population interactions. Am. Nat. 108, 207-228.
18. Mouquet, N. & Loreau, M. 2002 Coexistence in metacommunities: the regional similarity hypothesis. Am. Nat. 159, 420-426.
19. Murdoch, W. W. & Oaten, A. 1975 Predation and population stability. Adv. Ecol. Res. 9, 1-131.
20. Murray, J. D. 1993 Mathematical biology. New York: Springer.
21. Murrell, D. J. & Law, R. 2003 Heteromyopia and the spatial coexistence of similar competitors. Ecol. Lett. 6, 48-59.
22. Nishimura, K. & Kishida, O. 2001 Coupling of two competitive systems via density-dependent migration. Ecol. Res. 16, 359-368.
23. Pacala, S. W. & Roughgarden, J. 1982 Spatial heterogeneity and interspecific competition. Theor. Popul. Biol. 21, 92-113.
24. Pulliam, H. R. 1988 Sources, sinks and population regulation. Am. Nat. 132, 652-661.
25. Pulliam, H. R. & Danielson, B. J. 1991 Sources, sinks and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics. Am. Nat. 137, 50-66.
26. Rhainds, M., Gries, G. & Saleh, A. 1998 Density and pupation site of apterous female bagworms, Metisa plana (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Psychidae), influence the distribution of emergent larvae. Can. Entomol. 130, 603-613.
27. Shmida, A. & Ellner, S. 1984 Coexistence of plant species with similar niches. Vegetation 58, 29-55.
28. Snyder, R. & Chesson, P. 2003 Local dispersal can facilitate coexistence in the presence of permanent spatial heterogeneity. Ecol. Lett. 6, 301-309.
29. Sutherland, L. J., Gill, J. & Norris, K. 2002 Density-dependent dispersal in animals: concepts, evidence, mechanisms and consequences. In Dispersal ecology (ed. J. Bullock), pp. 134-151. Cambridge University Press.
30. Veit, R. & Lewis, M. A. 1996 Dispersal, population growth, and the Allee effect: dynamics of the house finch invasion of eastern North America. Am. Nat. 148, 255-274.
31. Wolff, J. O. 1997 Population regulation in mammals: an evolutionary perspective. J. Anim. Ecol. 66, 1-13.