The role of auditory feedback in birdsong

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 1016, Issue , 2004, Pages 463-475

  Konishi, Masakazu ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory feedback; Gating; Song learning; Songbirds; Vocal control system

Indexed keywords

GLUTAMIC ACID;

AGE DISTRIBUTION; ANESTHESIA; ATMOSPHERIC PRESSURE; AUDITORY RESPONSE; CANARY; CHANNEL GATING; CONFERENCE PAPER; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FOREBRAIN; HEARING; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; LANGUAGE; MEMORY; NERVE CELL; NONHUMAN; PREMOTOR CORTEX; RECORDING; RESPONSE TIME; SINGING; SLEEP; SONGBIRD; THEORETICAL MODEL; VOCAL CORD; WAKEFULNESS;

AVES; PASSERI;

EID: 3242681429     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1196/annals.1298.010     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (90)

1. WILSON, D.M. 1961. The central nervous control of flight in a locust. J. Exp. Biol. 38: 471-490.
2. MARLER, P. & M. TAMURA. 1962. Song variation in three populations of white-crowned sparrows. Condor 64: 368-377.
3. MARLER, P. & M. TAMURA. 1964. Culturally transmitted patterns of vocal behavior in sparrows. Science 146: 1483-1486.
4. MARLER, P. 1970. A comparative approach to vocal learning: song development in white-crowned sparrows. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. Monogr 71: 1-25.
5. KONISHI, M. 1963. The role of audition in the development and maintenance of avian vocal behavior. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley.
6. KONISHI, M. 1965. The role of auditory feedback in the control of vocalization in the white-crowned sparrow. Z. Tierpsychol. 22: 770-783.
7. MARLER, P. 1964. Inheritance and learning in the development of animal vocalizations. In Acoustic Behavior of Animals, R.-G. Busnell, Ed.: 228-243. Elsevier. Amsterdam.
8. DITTUS, W.P.J. & R.E. LEMON. 1970. Auditory feedback in the singing of cardinals. Ibis 112: 544-548.
9. MARLER, P. & M.S. WASER. 1977. The role of auditory feedback in canary song development. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 91: 8-16.
10. PRICE, P.H. 1979. Developmental determinants of structure in zebra finch song. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 93: 260-277.
11. MARLER, P. & V. SHERMAN. 1983. Song structure without auditory feedback: emendations of the auditory template hypothesis. J. Neurosci. 3: 517-531.
12. MARLER, P. 1997. Three models of song learning: evidence from behavior. J. Neurobiol. 33: 501-516.
13. MARGOLIASH, D. 2002. Evaluating theories of bird song learning: implications for future directions. J. Comp. Physiol. A 188: 851-866.
14. MARLER, P. & S. PETERS. 1982. Subsong and plastic song: their role in the vocal learning process. In Acoustic Communication in Birds. Vol. 2. Song Learning and Its Consequences. D.E. Kroodsma & E.H. Miller, Eds. Academic Press. New York.
15. MARLER, P. & S. PETERS. 1982. Developmental overproduction and selective attrition: New processes in the epigenesis of birdsong. Dev. Psychobiol. 15: 369-378.
16. SCHLEIDT, W. 1961. Operative Entfernung des Gehörorgans ohne Schädigung angrenzede Labyrinthteile bei Putenküken. Experientia 17: 464-465.
17. KONISHI, M. 1963. The role of auditory feedback in the vocal behavior of the domestic fowl. Z. Tierpsychol. 20: 349-367.
18. NOTTEBOHM, F. & M.E. NOTTEBOHM. 1971. Vocalizations and breeding behavior of surgically deafened ring doves (Streptopelia risoria). Anim. Behav. 19: 313-327.
19. KROODSMA, D.E. & M. KONISHI. 1991. A suboscine bird (eastern phoebe, Sayornis phoebe) develops normal song without auditory feedback. Anim. Behav. 42: 477-484.
20. KONISHI, M. 1964. Effects of deafening on song development in two species of juncos. Condor 66: 85-102.
21. KONISHI, M. 1965. Effects of deafening on song development in American robins and black-headed grosbeaks. Z. Tierpsychol. 22: 349-367.
22. AKUTAGAWA, E. & M. KONISHI. 1985. Neuronal growth, atrophy and death in a sexually dimorphic song nucleus in the zebra finch. Nature 315: 145-147.
23. GUETTINGER, H.R. 1979. The integration of learnt and genetically programmed behaviour: a study of hierarchical organization in songs of canaries, greenfinches and their hybrids. Z. Tierpyschol. 49: 285-303.
24. GUETTINGER, H.R., J. WOLFFGRAMM & F. THIMM. 1978. The relationship between species specific song programs and individual learning in song birds. Behaviour 65: 241-262.
25. NOTTEBOHM, F., T.M. STOKES & C.M. LEONARDO. 1976. Central control of song in the canary, Srinus canaria. J. Comp. Neurol. 165: 457-486.
26. KATZ, L.C. & M.E. GURNEY. 1981. Auditory responses in the zebra finch's motor system for song. Brain Res. 211: 192-197.
27. MCCASLAND, J.S. & M. KONISHI. 1981. Interaction between auditory and motor activities in an avian song control nucleus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 7815-7819.
28. MARGOLIASH, D. 1983. Acoustic parameters underlying the responses of song-specific neurons in the white-crowned sparrow. J. Neurosci. 3: 1039-1057.
29. WILLIAMS, H. & F. NOTTEBOHM. 1985. Auditory responses in avian vocal motor neurons: a motor theory for song perception in birds. Science 229: 279-282.
30. WILLIAMS, H. 1989. Multiple representations and auditory-motor interactions in the avian song system. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 563: 148-164.
31. DOUPE, A.J. & M. KONISHI. 1992. Song selective auditory circuits in the vocal control system of the zebra finch. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 11339-11343.
32. VOLMAN, S.F. 1993. Development of neural selectivity for birdsong during vocal learning. J. Neurosci. 13: 4737-4747.
33. DOUPE, A.J. 1997. Song and order-selective neurons in the songbird anterior forebrain and their emergence during vocal development. J. Neurosci. 17: 1147-1167.
34. SOLIS, M.M. & A.J. DOUPE. 1997. Anterior forebrain neurons develop selectivity by an intermediate stage of birdsong learning. J. Neurosci. 17: 6447-6462.
35. SOLIS, M.M. & A.J. DOUPE. 1999. Contributions of tutor and BOS experience to neural selectivity in the songbird anterior forebrain. J. Neurosci. 19: 4559-4584.
36. SOLIS, M.M. & A.J. DOUPE. 2000. Compromised neural selectivity for song in birds with impaired sensorimotor learning. Neuron 25: 109-121.
37. MARGOLIASH, D. & E.S. FORTUNE. 1992. Temporal and harmonic combination-sensitive neurons in the zebra finch's HVc. J. Neurosci. 12: 4309-4326.
38. LEWICKI, M.S. & M. KONISHI. 1995. Mechanisms underlying the sensitivity of songbird forebrain neurons to temporal order. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 5582-5586.
39. LEWICKI, M.S. 1996. Intracellular characterization of song-specific neurons in the zebra finch forebrain. J. Neurosci. 16: 5855-5863.
40. THEUNISSEN, F.E. & A.J. DOUPE. 1998. Temporal and spectral sensitivity of complex auditory neurons in the nucleus HVc of male zebra finches. J. Neurosci. 18: 3786-3802.
41. THEUNISSEN, F.E., K. SEN & A.J. DOUPE. 2000. Spectral-temporal receptive fields of nonlinear auditory neurons obtained using natural sounds. J. Neurosci. 20: 2315-2331.
42. JANATA, P. & D. MARGOLIASH. 1999. Gradual emergence of song selectivity in sensorimotor structures of the male zebra finch song system. J. Neurosci 19: 5108-5118.
43. COLEMAN, M.J. & R. MOONEY. 2002. Source of auditory input to the songbird nucleus HVc revealed by pairwise recordings in Nif and HVc. Soc. Neurosci. Abst. 588.4.
44. MOONEY, R. 2000. Different subthreshold mechanisms underlie song selectivity in identified HVc neurons of the zebra finch. J. Neurosci. 20: 5420-5436.
45. MOONEY, R., M.J. ROSEN & C.B. STURDY. 2002. A bird's eye view: top down intracellular analyses of auditory selectivity for learned vocalizations. J. Comp. Physiol. A 188: 879-895.
46. ROSEN, M.J & R. MOONEY. 2000. Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to auditory selectivity in a song nucleus critical for vocal plasticity. J. Neurosci. 20: 5437-5448.
47. ROSEN, M.J. & R. MOONEY. 2003. Inhibitory and excitatory mechanisms underlying auditory responses to learned vocalizations in the songbird nucleus HVC. Neuron 39: 177-194.
48. MOONEY, R., W. HOESE & S. NOWICKI. 2001. Auditory representation of the vocal repertoire in a songbird with multiple song types. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 12778-12783.
49. NORDEEN, K.W. & E.J. NORDEEN. 1992. Auditory feedback is necessary for the maintenance of stereotyped song in adult zebra finches. Behav. Neural. Biol. 57: 58-66.
50. OKANOYA, K. & A. YAMAGUCHI. 1997. Adult Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata) require real-time auditory feedback to produce normal song syntax. J. Neurobiol. 4: 343-356.
51. WOOLLEY, S.M. & E.W. RUBEL. 1997. Bengalese finches Lonchura striata domestica depend upon auditory feedback for maintenance of adult song. J. Neurosci. 17: 6380-6390.
52. WOOLLEY, S.M.N. & E.W. RUBEL. 2002. Vocal memory and learning in adult Bengalese finches with regenerated hair cells. J. Neurosci. 22: 7774-7787.
53. LOMBARDINO, A.J. & F. NOTTEBOHM. 2000. Age at deafening affects the stability of learned song in adult male zebra finches. J. Neurosci. 20: 5054-5064.
54. NOTTEBOHM, F. 1968. Auditory experience and song development in the chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs). Ibis 110: 549-567.
55. SUTHERS, R.A. F. GOLLER & J.M. WILD. 2002. Somatosensory feedback modulates the respiratory motor program of crystallized birdsong. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 5680-5685.
56. LEONARDO, A. 2002. Neural dynamics underlying complex behavior in a songbird. Ph.D. thesis, California Institute of Technology. Pasadena, CA.
57. LEONARDO, A. & M. KONISHI. 1999. Decrystallization of adult birdsong by perturbation of auditory feedback. Nature 399: 466-470.
58. CYNX, J. & U. VON RAD. 2001. Immediate and transitory effects of delayed auditory feedback on bird song production. Anim. Behav. 62: 305-312.
59. BRAINARD, M.S. & A.J. DOUPE. 2001. Alteration of auditory feedback causes both acute and lasting changes to Bengalese finch song. Soc. Neurosci. Abst. 269.6.
60. BOTTJER, S.W., E.A. MIESNER & A.P. ARNOLD. 1984. Forebrain lesions disrupt development but not maintenance of song in passerine birds. Science 224: 901-903.
61. SOHRAJI, F., E.J. NORDEEN & K.W. NORDEEN. 1990. Selective impairment of song learning following lesions of a forebrain nucleus in the juvenile zebra finch. Behav. Neural. Biol. 53: 51-63.
62. SCHARFF, C. & F. NOTTEBOHM. 1991. A comparative study of the behavioral deficit following lesions of various parts of the zebra finch song system: implication for vocal learning. J. Neurosci. 11: 2896-2913.
63. VICARIO, D.S. & K.H. YOHAY. 1993. Song-selective auditory input to a forebrain vocal control nucleus in the zebra finch. J. Neurobiol. 24: 488-505.
64. KITTELBERGER, J.M. & R. MOONEY. 1999. Lesions of an avian forebrain nucleus that disrupt song development alter synaptic connectivity and transmission in the vocal premotor pathway. J. Neurosci. 19: 9385-9398.
65. HESSLER, N.A. & A.J. DOUPE. 1999. Singing related neural activity in a dorsal forebrain-basal ganglia circuit of adult zebra finches. J. Neurosci. 19: 10461-10481.
66. WILLIAMS, H. & N. METHA. 1999. Changes in the adult zebra finch song require a forebrain nucleus that is not necessary for song production. J. Neurobiol. 39: 14-28.
67. BRAINARD, M.S. & A.J. DOUPE. 2000. Interruption of a basal ganglia-forebrain circuit prevents plasticity of learned vocalizations. Nature 404: 762-766.
68. BENTON, S., D.A. NELSON, P. MARLER & T.J. DEVOOGD. 1998. Anterior forebrain pathway is needed for stable song expression in adult male white-crowned sparrows (Zonotrichia leucophrys). Behav. Brain Res. 96: 135-150.
69. KOBAYASHI, K., H. UNO & K. OKANOYA. 2001. Partial lesions in the anterior forebrain pathway affect song production in adult Bengalese finches. Neuroreport 12: 353-358.
70. 0 contours in syllables. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer. 111: 357-366.
71. SCHNITZLER H.U. 1968. Die Ultraschallortungslaute der Hufeisennasen-Fledermäuse (Chiroptera, Rhinolophidae) in verschiedenen Orientierungssituationen. Z. vergl. Physiol. 57: 376-408.
72. SCHULLER, G. 1977. Echo delay and overlap with emitted orientation sounds and Doppler-shift compensation in the bat, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. J. Comp. Physiol. 114: 103-114.
73. SCHULLER, G., K. BEUTER & R. RÜBSAMEN. 1975. Dynamic properties of the compensation system for Doppler-shifts in the bat, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. J. Comp. Physiol. 97: 113-125.
74. TROYER, T.W. & A.J. DOUPE. 2000. An associational model of birdsong sensorimotor learning. 1. Efference copy and the learning of song syllables. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 1204-1223.
75. METZNER, W. 1993. An audio-vocal interface in echolocating horseshoe bats. J. Neurosci. 13: 1899-1915.
76. DAVE, A.S., A.C. YU & D. MARGOLIASH. 2000. Song replay during sleep and computational rules for sensorimotor vocal learning. Science 290: 812-816
77. DAVE, A.S., A.C. YU & D. MARGOLIASH. 1998. Behavioral state modulation of auditory activity in a vocal motor system. Science 282: 2250-2254.
78. RAUSKE, P.L., S.D. SHEA & D. MARGOLIASH. 2003. State and neuronal class-dependent reconfiguration in the avian song system. J. Neurophysiol. 89: 1688-1701.
79. NICK, T.A. & M. KONISHI. 2001. Dynamic control of auditory activity during sleep: Correlation between song response and EEG. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 14012-14016.
80. SCHMIDT, M.F. & M. KONISHI. 1998. Gating of auditory responses in the vocal control system of awake songbirds. Nat. Neurosci. 1: 513-518.
81. CARDIN, J.A. & M.F. SCHMIDT. 2002. Behavioral state-dependent modulation of auditory input to HVC and NIf. Neurosci. Abstr. 588.11.
82. FORTUNE, E.S. & D. MARGOLISH. 1995. Parallel pathways and convergence onto HVc and adjacent neostriatum of adult zebra finches (Teniopygia guttata). J. Comp. Neurol. 360: 413-441.
83. VATES, G.E., B.E. BROOME, C.V. MELLO & F. NOTTEBOHM. 1996. Auditory pathways of caudal telencephalon and their relation to the song system of adult male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). J. Comp. Neurol. 366: 613-642.
84. BOCO, T. & D. MARGOLIASH. 2001. NIf is a major source of auditory and spontaneous drive to HVc. Soc. Neurosci. Abstr. 381.2.
85. COLEMAN, M.J. & E.T. VU. 2001. Uva lesions affect the auditory responsiveness of HVC neurons in awake zebra finches. Soc. Neurosci. Abst. Program No. 538.12.
86. WILLIAMS, H. & D.S. VICARIO. 1993. Temporal patterning of song production: participation of nucleus uvaeformis of the thalamus. J. Neurobiol. 24: 903-912.
87. STRIEDTER G.F. & E.T. VU. 1998. Bilateral feedback projections to the forebrain in the premotor network for singing in zebra finches. J. Neurobiol. 34: 27-40.
88. SHEA, S.D. & D. MARGOLIASH. 2003. Basal forebrain cholinergic modulation of auditory activity in the zebra finch song system. Neuron 40: 1213-1226.
89. LI, R. & H. SAKAGUCHI. 1997. Cholinergic innervation of the song control nuclei by the ventral paleostriatum in the zebra finch: a double labeling study with fluorescence tracers and choline acetyltransferase immunohistochemistry. Brain Res. 763: 239-246.
90. NEALEN, P.M. & M.F. SCHMIDT. 2002. Comparative approaches to avian song system function: insight into auditory and motor processing. J. Comp. Physiol. A 188: 929-941.