Adult Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata var. domestica) require real- time auditory feedback to produce normal song syntax

Journal of Neurobiology

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 343-356

  Okanoya, Kazuo ^a,c   Yamaguchi, Ayako ^b  

^a NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH CENTER   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c CHIBA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Auditory feedback; Close ended learner; Deafening; Lonchura striata; Vocal motor control

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BIRD; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; LEARNING; NONHUMAN; PHONETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGING;

ACOUSTICS; AGING; ANIMALS; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; BIRDS; COCHLEA; COMPUTER SYSTEMS; FEEDBACK; MALE; REFERENCE VALUES; VOCALIZATION, ANIMAL;

EID: 0030765376     PISSN: 00223034     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4695(199710)33:4<343::AID-NEU1>3.0.CO;2-A     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. BEEMAN, K. (1992). Signal User's Manual: Engineering Design, Belmont, MA.
2. BOTTJER, S. W. and ARNOLD, A. P. (1984). The role of feedback from the vocal organ. I. Maintenance of stereotypical vocalizations by adult zebra finches. J. Neurosci. 4:2387-2396.
3. BOTTJER, S. W., MIESNER, E. A., and ARNOLD, A. P. (1984). Forebrain lesions disrupt development but not maintenance of song in passerine birds. Science 224:901-902.
4. BRAUTH, S. E. (1990). Investigation of central auditory nuclei in the budgerigar with cytochrome oxidase histochemistry. Brain Res. 508:142-146.
5. BRINDLEY, E. L. (1991). Response of European robins to playback of song: neighbor recognition and overlapping. Anim. Behav. 41:503-512.
6. CATCHPOLE, C. K. (1976). Temporal and sequential organisation of song in the sedge warbler (Acrocephalus schoenobaenus). Behaviour 46:224-246.
7. CLARK, C., MARLER, P., and BEEMAN, K. (1987). Quantitative analysis of animal vocal phonology: an application to swamp sparrow song. Ethology 76:101-115.
8. CLAYTON, N. S. (1987). Song learning in Bengalese finches: a comparison with zebra finches. Ethology 76:247-255.
9. GUETTINGER, H. R. (1979). The integration of learned and genetically programmed behaviour: a study of hierarchical organization in songs of canaries, greenfinches and their hybrids. Z. Tierpsychol. 49:285-303.
10. GUETTINGER, H. R. (1981). Self-differentiation of song organization rules by deaf canaries. Z. Tierpsychol. 56:323-340.
11. HARTLEY, R. S., CHINN, M. S., and ULLRICH, N. F. E. (1997). Left syringeal dominance in testosteronetreated female canaries. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 67:248-253.
12. HULTSCH, H. (1993). Tracing the memory mechanisms in the song acquisition of birds. Neth. J. Zool. 43:155-171.
13. IMMELMANN, K. (1969). Song development in the zebra finch and other estrildid finches. In: Bird Vocalizations. R. A. Hinde, Ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 61-74.
14. KONISHI, M. (1964). Effects of deafening on song development in two species of juncos. Condor 66:85-102.
15. KONISHI, M. (1965). The role of auditory feedback in the control of vocalization in the white-crowned sparrow. Z. Tierpsychol. 22:770-783.
16. KONISHI, M. and NOTTEBOHM, F. (1969). Experimental studies in the ontogeny of avian vocalizations. In: Bird Vocalizations. R. A. Hinde, Ed. Cambrige University Press, Cambridge, pp. 29-60.
17. KROODSMA, D. E. (1982). Learning and the ontogeny of sound signals in birds. In: Acoustic Communication in Birds. Vol. 2. D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, Eds. Academic Press, New York, pp. 1-23.
18. KROODSMA, D. E. and BAYLIS, J. R. (1982). Appendix: a world survey of evidence for vocal learning in birds. In: Acoustic Communication in Birds, Vol. 2. D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, Eds. Academic Press, New York, pp. 311-377.
19. KROODSMA, D. E. and BRENOWITZ, E. (1996). The neuroethology of birdsong. In: Ecology and Evolution of Acoustic Communication in Birds. D. E. Kroodsma and E. H. Miller, Eds. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, pp. 285-304.
20. LEMON, R. and CHATFIELD, C. (1971). Organization of song in cardinals. Anim. Behav. 19:1-17.
21. MARLER, P. and SHERMAN, V. (1983). Song structure without auditory feedback: emendations of the auditory emplate hypothesis. J. Neurosci. 3:517-531.
22. MAKLER, P. and WASER, M. S. (1977). Role of auditory feedback in canary song development. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 91:8-16.
23. NELSON, D. and MARLER, P. (1993). Measurement of song learning behavior in birds. In: Paradigms for the Study of Behavior. P. M. Conn, Ed. Academic Press, New York, pp. 447-465.
24. NORDEEN, K. W. and NORDEEN, E. J. (1992). Auditory feedback is necessary for the maintenance of stereotyped song in adult zebra finches. Behav. Neural Biol. 57:58-66.
25. NOTTEBOHM, F. (1968). Auditory experience and song development in the chaffinch (Fringila coelebs ). Ibis 110:549-568.
26. NOTTEBOHM, F., ALVAREZ-BUYLLA, A., CYNX, J., KIRN, J., LING, C.-Y., NOTTEBOHM, M., SUTER, R., TOLLES, A., and WILLIAMS, H. (1990) Song learning in birds: the relation between perception and production. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 329:115-124.
27. NOTTEBOHM, F. and NOTTEBOHM, M. (1978). Relationship between song repertoire and age in the canary Serinus canaria. Z. Teirpschol. 46:298-305.
28. NOTTEBOHM, F. and NOTTEBOHM, M. (1986). Development and seasonal changes in canary song and their relation to changes in the anatomy of song-control nuclei. Behav. Neural Biol. 46:445-471.
29. NOTTEBOHM, F., STOKES, T. M., and LEONARD, C. M. (1976). Central control of song in the canary, Serinus canarius. J. Comp. Neurol. 165:457-468.
30. OKANOYA, K. (1996). Temporal organizations in birdsong. In: Proceedings of the 3rd US-Japan Joint Meeting of Acoustical Society of America (Hawaii, 1996). Acoustical Society of Japan, pp. 125-128.
31. OKANOYA, K. and KIMURA, T. (1993). Acoustical and perceptual structures of sexually dimorphic distance calls in Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata domestica). J. Comp. Psychol. 107:386-394.
32. OKANOYA, K., YAMAGUCHI, A., and KIMURA, T. (1990). Crystallized songs of Bengalese finches (Lonchura striata domestica) deteriorate rapidly after deafening. Neurosci. Res. S14:S63.
33. OKANOYA, K., YONEDA, T., KIMURA, T., and YAMAGUCHI, A. (1991). Acoustic communication and auditory feedback in Bengalese finches. IEICE Tech. Report (Denshijyouhoutsuushingakkai Gijyutukenkyuu Houkoku) 90:55-61.
34. PRICE, P. H. (1979). Developmental determinants of structure in zebra finch song. J. Comp. Physiol. Psyhol. 93:260-277.
35. RICE, W. R. (1989). Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223-225.
36. SOHABJI, F., NORDEEN. E., and NORDEEN, K. (1990). Selective impairment of song learning following lesions of a forebrain nucleus in the juvenile zebra finch. Behav. Neural Biol. 53:51-63.
37. SOSSINKA, R. and BOEHNER, J. (1980). Song types in the zebra finch. Poephila guttata castanotis. Z. Tierpsychol. 53:123-132.
38. STODDART, P. K., BEECHER, M. D., and WILLIS, M. (1988). Response of territorial male song sparrows to song types and variations. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 22:125-130.
39. TSUTSUI, K. and BOTTJER, S. W. (1989). Afferent input from the vocal organ projects to forebrain nuclei that are involved with song learning in zebra finches. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress of Neuroethology (Berlin, Sept. 1989). J. Erber et al., Eds. George Thieme Verlag. Stuttgart, p. 118.
40. VICARIO, D. and WILLIAMS, H. (1993). Temporal patterning of song production: participation of nucleus Uvaforms of the thalamus. J. Neurobiol. 24:903-912.
41. WATANABE, A. and AOKI, K. (1996). The role of auditory feedback on song behavior in adult male Bengalese finches. Zool. Sci. 13:S59.
42. WOOLEY, S. M. N. and RUBEL, E. W. (1996). Bengalese finches depend upon auditory feedback for maintenance of stable adult song. Abstr. Soc. Neurosci. 22:693.
43. WRIGHT, S. P. (1992). Adjusted p-values for simultaneous inference. Biometrics 48:1005-1013.