Comparison of results of lactic acid sting tests between sensitive skin and nonsensitive skin after tape stripping

Korean Journal of Dermatology

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 527-535

  Lee, Weon Ju ^a   Jang, Yun Hwan ^a   Kim, Do Won ^a   Lee, Seok Jong ^a   Na, Gun Yeon ^a   Chung, Sang Lip ^a  

^a Kyungpook National University School of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Lactic acid sting test; Sensitive skin; Tape stripping

Indexed keywords

LACTIC ACID;

ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FOREARM; HUMAN; LACTIC ACID STING TEST; SCORING SYSTEM; SKIN IRRITATION; SKIN SENSITIVITY; SKIN TEST; SKIN WATER LOSS; STRATUM CORNEUM;

EID: 3242674428     PISSN: 04944739     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Amin S, Maibach HI. Cosmetic intolerance syndrome: pathophysiology and management. Cosmet Dermatol 1996;9:34-42
2. Draelos ZD. Sensitive skin: perceptions, evaluation, and treatment. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1997;8:67-68
3. Johnson AW, Nettesheim S. The care of normal skin, In: Arndt KA, Robinson JK, Leboit PE, Wintroub BU. Cutaneous medicine and surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1996:78-79
4. Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Sensitive and ethnic skin: A need for special skin-care agents. Dermatol Clin 1991;9: 89-92
5. Mills OH, Berger RS. Defining the susceptibility of acne-prone and sensitive skin populations to extrinsic factors. Dermatol Clin 1991;9:93-7
6. Simion FA, Rau AH. Sensitive skin: what is and how formulate it. Cosmet Toilet 1994;109:43-49
7. Maibach HI, Engasser PG. Cosmetic intolerance syndrome. Semin Dermatol 1986;5:273-276
8. Green BG. Measurement of sensory irritation of the skin. Am J Contact Dermat. 2000;11:170-180
9. Lammintausta K, Maibach HI, Wilson D. Mechanisms of subjective (sensory) irritation. Dermatosen 1988;36:45-49
10. Frosch PJ, Kligman AM. A method for appraising the stinging capacity of topically applied substances. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1977;28:197-209
11. Grove G, Soschin D, Kligman AM. Guideline for performing facial stinging tests. Prosc 12th Congress Internat Fed Soc of Cosmet Chem, Paris, Sept 1982:13-17
12. Mayne JR, Mills OH, Lyssikatos. Lactic acid sting assay: reproducibility and symmetry of subjective sting response. J Derm Clin Eval Soc 1992;3:63
13. Laden K. Studies on irritancy and stinging potential. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1973;24:385-393
14. Basketter DA, Griffiths HA. A study of the relationship between susceptibility to skin stinging and skin irritation. Contact Dermatitis 1993;4:158-162
15. Christensen M, Kligman AM. An improved procedure for conducting lactic acid stinging tests on facial skin. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1996;47:1-11
16. Fisher A. Cosmetic actions and reactions: therapeutic, irritant, and allergic. Cutis 1980;26:22-29
17. Willis CM, Shaw S, Lacharriere OD, Baverel M, Reiche L, Jourdain R, et al. Sensitive skin: an epidemiological study. Br J Dermatol 2001;145:258-263
18. Aramaki J, Kawana S, Effendy I, Happle R, Loffier H. Differences of skin irritation between Japanese and European women. Br J Dermatol 2002;146:1052-1056
19. Kompaore F, Marty JP, Dupon C. In vivo evaluation of the stratum corneum barrier function in blacks, Caucasians and Asians with noninvasive methods. Skin Pharmacol 1993;6:200-207
20. Frosch PJ. Clinical aspects of irritant contact dermatitis, In: Raycroft RJG, Menne T, Frosch PJ, Lepoittevin JP. Textbook of contact dermatitis. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2001;33.7-347
21. Seidenari S, Francomano M, Mantovani L. Baseline biophysical parameters in subjects with sensitive skin. Contact Dermatitis 1998;38:311-315
22. Lammintausta K, Maibach HI. Irritant reactivity in males and females. Contact Dermatitis 1987;17:276-280
23. Berardesca E, Maibach HI. Racial differences in sodium lauryl sulphate induced cutaneous irritation: black and white. Contact Dermatitis 1988;18:65-70
24. Muizzuddin N, Marenus KD, Males DH. Factors defining sensitive skin and its treatment. Am J Contact Dermatitis 1998;9:170-175
25. Maibach HI, Lammintausta K, Berardesca E, Freeman S. Tendency to irritation: sensitive skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 1989;21:833-835
26. Lammintausta K, Maibach HI, Wilson D. Susceptibility to cumulative and acute irritant dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 1988;19:84-90
27. Agner T, Serup J. Individual and instrumental variations in irritant patch test reactions-clinical evaluations and quantification by bioengineering methods. Clin Exp Dermatol 1990;15:29-33
28. Coverly J, Peters L, Whittle E, Basketter DA. Susceptibility to skin stinging, non-immunologic contact urticaria and acute skin irritation: is there a relationship? Contact Dermatitis 1998;38:90-95
29. Frosch P, Duncan S, Kingman AM. Cutaneous biometrics I. The response of human skin to dimethyl sulfoxide. Br J Dermatol 1980;102:263-274
30. Agner T, Serup J. Quantification of the DMSO response: A test for assessment of sensitive skin. Clin Exp Dermatol 1989;14:214-217
31. Eriksson G, Lambke Lo. Regeneration of human epidermal surface and water barrier function after stripping. Acta Derm Venerol(Stockh) 1971;51:169-178
32. Pinkus H. Examination of the epidermis by the strip method of removing horny layers. I. Observations on thickness of the horny layer, and on mitotic activity after stripping. J Invest Dermatol 1951;16:383-386
33. van der Valk PG, Maibach HI. Functional study of the skin barrier to evaporative water loss by means of repeated cellophane-tape stripping. Clin Exp Dermatol 1990;15:180-182
34. Weigand DA, Gaylor JR. Removal of stratum corneum in vivo: an improvement on the cellophane tape stripping technique. J Invest Dermatol 1973;60:84-87
35. Pinnagoda J, Tupker RA, Coenraads PJ, Nater JP. Prediction of susceptibility to an irritant response by transepidermal water loss. Contact Dermatitis 1989;20:341-346