A randomised trial comparing submucosal haemorrhoidectomy with radiofrequency bistoury vs. diathermic haemorrhoidectomy

European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 79-85

  Filingeri, V ^c   Gravante, G ^c   Baldessari, E ^c   Craboledda, P ^a   Bellati, F ^b   Casciani, C U ^a  

^a S EUGENIO HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY CAMPUS BIO MEDICO   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Haemorrhoidectomy; Proctology; Radiofrequency surgery

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; CEFTRIAXONE; DIAZEPAM; KETOROLAC; LACTULOSE; METRONIDAZOLE;

ACCURACY; ADULT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEFECATION; DIATHERMY; FEMALE; HEMORRHOID; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; OPERATION DURATION; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; POSTOPERATIVE INFECTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RADIOFREQUENCY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; ELECTROCOAGULATION; ELECTROSURGERY; FEMALE; HEMORRHOIDS; HUMANS; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; MALE; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; RADIO WAVES; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, OPERATIVE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 3242660828     PISSN: 11283602     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (16)

1. Filingeri V, Casciani CU. Submucosal haemorrhoidectomy with a radiofrequency bistoury. Minerva Chir 1997; 52: 1255-1259.
2. Andrews BT, Layer GT, Jackson BT, Nicholls RJ. Randomised trial comparing diathermic hemorrhoidectomy with the scissors dissection Milligan Morgan operation. Dis Col Rectum 1993; 36: 580-583.
3. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001; 357: 1191-1194.
4. Anon R. New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology 1963; 24: 111.
5. Parks AG. The surgical treatment of haemorrhoids. In Rob C, Smith R. Operative Surgery - Chap. 5: Abdomen and Rectum and Anus. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: J B Lippincott, 1969; 706-717.
6. White WF. Radiosurgery: an advancement over the scalpel in many procedures. Podiatr Prod Rep 1986; 3: 16-25.
7. Milligan ETC, Morgan C, Naughton-Jones LF, Office RR. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal and the operative treatment of haemorrhoids. Lancet 1937; ii: 1119-1124.
8. 2 laser Haemorrhoidectomy - does it alter anorectal function or decrease pain compared to diathermic haemorrhoidectomy? Int J Colorectal Dis 1995; 10: 22-24.
9. Longo A. Treatment of haemorrhoidal disease by reduction of mucosal and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular stapling device: a new procedure. Proceedings of the Sixth World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery, 3 June 1998. Rome: Monduzzi Editore, 777-784.
10. Palazzo FF, Francio DL, Clifton MA. Randomised clinical trial of Ligasure versus open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 154-157.
11. Jayne Dg, Botterill I. Ambrose NS. Brennan TG, Guillou PJ, O'Riordain DS. Randomised clinical trial of Ligasure versus diathermic diathermy for day-case haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2002; 89: 428-432.
12. Bailey HR, Ferguson JA. Prevention of urinary retention by fluid restriction following anorectal operations. Dis Colon Rectum 1976; 19: 250-252.
13. Salvati EP, Kleckner MS. Urinary retention in anorectal and colonic surgery. Am J Surg 1957; 94: 114-117.
14. Prasad ML, Abcarian H. Urinary retention following operations for benign anorectal disease. Dis Colon Rectum 1978; 21: 490-492.
15. Bennet RC, Friedman RH, Goligher IC. Late results haemorrhoidectomy by ligature and excision. Br Med J 1963; 2: 216-219.
16. Thompson WHF. The nature of haemorrhoids. Br J Surg 1975; 62: 542-552.