Time-course of control by specific stimulus features and relational cues during same-different discrimination training

Learning and Behavior

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 183-189

  Gibson, Brett M ^a,b   Wasserman, Edward A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONCEPT FORMATION; CONTROL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS; LEARNING; NONHUMAN; PIGEON; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; TRAINING; VISUAL STIMULATION;

EID: 3242660738     PISSN: 15434494     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/bf03196019     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. COOK, R. [G.], BLAISDELL, A., LEVISON, D., & GILLETTE, S. (2001, March). How big is avian long-term associative memory? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Comparative Cognition Society, Melbourne, FL.
2. COOK, R. G., KATZ, J. S., & CAVOTO, B. R. (1997). Pigeon same-different concept learning with multiple stimulus classes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 417-433.
3. FETTERMAN, J. G. (1996). Dimensions of stimulus complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 3-18.
4. GIBSON, B. M., & WASSERMAN, E. A. (2003). Pigeons learn stimulus identity and stimulus relations when both serve as redundant, relevant cues during same-different discrimination training. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 84-91.
5. GOTTSELIG, J. M., WASSERMAN, E. A., & YOUNG, M. E. (2001). Attentional tradeoffs in pigeons learning to discriminate newly relevant visual stimulus dimensions. Learning & Motivation, 32, 240-253.
6. HERRNSTEIN, R. J. (1990). Levels of stimulus control: A functional approach. Cognition, 37, 133-166.
7. HERRNSTEIN, R. J., LOVELAND, D. H., & CABLE, C. (1976). Natural concepts in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 285-311.
8. MORGAN, C. L. (1894). An introduction to comparative psychology. In D. N. Robinson (Series & Vol. Ed.), Significant contributions to the history of psychology: Series D. Comparative Psychology: Vol. II. C. L. Morgan (pp. 1-377). Washington, DC: University Publications of America.
9. SANTIAGO, H. C., & WRIGHT, A. A. (1984). Pigeon memory: Same/different concept learning, serial probe recognition acquisition, and probe delay effects on the serial-position function. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 498-512.
10. VAUGHAN, W., JR., & GREENE, S. L. (1984). Pigeon visual memory capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 256-271.
11. WASSERMAN, E. A., FRANK, A. J., & YOUNG, M. E. (2002). Stimulus control by same-versus-different relational among multiple visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28, 347-357.
12. WASSERMAN, E. A., HUGART, J. A., & KIRKPATRICK-STEGER, K. (1995). Pigeons show same-different conceptualization after training with complex visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 248-252.
13. WRIGHT, A. A., COOK, R. G., & KENDRICK, D. F. (1989). Relational and absolute stimulus learning by monkeys in a memory task. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 237-248.
14. YOUNG, M. E., & WASSERMAN, E. A. (1997). Response to mixed visual displays after same-different discrimination training. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 157-170.
15. YOUNG, M. E., & WASSERMAN, E. A. (2001). Evidence for a conceptual account of same-different discrimination learning in the pigeon. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 677-684.