Stimulus control by same-versus-different relations among multiple visual stimuli

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 347-357

  Wasserman, Edward A ^a,c   Frank, Andrea J ^a   Young, Michael E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^b SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c E11 SSH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COLUMBA;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONCEPT FORMATION; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PIGEONS AND DOVES; PROBLEM SOLVING; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; COLUMBIDAE; CONCEPT FORMATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; GENERALIZATION, STIMULUS; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; REACTION TIME; TRANSFER (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0036780459     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.28.4.347     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Astley, S. L., & Wasserman, E. A. (1992). Categorical discrimination and generalization in pigeons: All negative stimuli are not created equal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 193-207.
2. Delius, J. D. (1994). Comparative cognition of identity. In P. Bertelson, P. Eelen, & G. d'Ydewalle (Eds.), International perspectives on psychological science (Vol. 1, pp. 25-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Ennaceur, A., & Delacour, J. (1988). A new one-trial test for neurobio-logical studies of memory in rats: I. Behavioral data. Behavioural Brain Research, 31, 47-59.
4. Goldstone, R. L., & Barsalou, L. W. (1998). Reuniting perception and conception. Cognition, 65, 231-262.
5. Gottselig, J. M., Wasserman, E. A., & Young, M. E. (2001). Attentional tradeoffs in pigeons learning to discriminate newly-relevant visual stimulus dimensions. Learning and Motivation, 32, 240-253.
6. Holman, E. W. (1973). Temporal properties of gustatory spontaneous alternation in rats. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 85, 536-539.
7. Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., & Wasserman, E. A. (1996). The what and the where of the pigeon's processing of complex visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 60-67.
8. Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (2000). The pigeon's discrimination of shape and location information. Visual Cognition, 7, 417-436.
9. Locke, J. (1975). An essay concerning human understanding. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press. (Original work published 1690)
10. Pomplun, M., Sichelschmidt, L., Wagner, K., Clermont, T., Rickheit, G., & Ritter, H. (2001). Comparative visual search: A difference that makes a difference. Cognitive Science, 25, 3-36.
11. Premack, D. (1983). The codes of man and beast. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, 125-137.
12. Premack, D. (1988). Minds with and without language. In L. Weiskrantz (Ed.), Thought without language (pp. 46-65). New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Roberts, W. A. (1997). Does a common mechanism account for timing and counting phenomena in the pigeon? In C. M. Bradshaw & E. Szabadi (Eds.), Time and behaviour: Psychological and neurobehavioural analyses (pp. 185-215). Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland/Elsevier Science.
14. Save, E., Poucet, B., & Thinus-Blanc, C. (1998). Landmark use and the cognitive map in the rat. In S. Healy (Ed.), Spatial representation in animals (pp. 119-132). New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Thinus-Blanc, C., Save, E., & Poucet, B. (1998). Animal spatial cognition and exploration. In N. Foreman & R. Gillett (Eds.), A handbook of spatial research paradigms and methodologies: Vol. 2. Clinical and comparative studies (pp. 59-86). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
16. Thompson, R. K. R., & Oden, D. L. (2000). Categorical perception and conceptual judgments by nonhuman primates: The paleological monkey and the analogical ape. Cognitive Science, 24, 363-396.
17. Wasserman, E. A., Fagot, J., & Young, M. E. (2001). Same-different conceptualization by baboons (Papio papio). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115, 42-52.
18. Wasserman, E. A., Hugart, J. A., & Kirkpatrick-Steger, K. (1995). Pigeons show same-different conceptualization after training with complex visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 21, 248-252.
19. Young, M. E., & Wasserman, E. A. (1997). Entropy detection by pigeons: Response to mixed visual displays after same-different discrimination training. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 157-170.
20. Young, M. E., & Wasserman, E. A. (2001a). Entropy and variability discrimination. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 278-293.
21. Young, M. E., & Wasserman, E. A. (2001b). Evidence for a conceptual account of same-different discrimination learning in the pigeon. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8, 677-684.
22. Young, M. E., Wasserman, E. A., & Dalrymple, R. M. (1997). Memory-based same-different conceptualization by pigeons. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 552-558.
23. Young, M. E., Wasserman, E. A., & Gamer, K. L. (1997). Effects of number of items on the pigeon's discrimination of same from different visual displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 491-501.
24. Zentall, T. R., & Riley, D. A. (2000). Selective attention in animal discrimination learning. Journal of General Psychology, 127, 45-66.