Hierarchical models for avian ecologists

Condor

Volumn 108, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-4

  Kristan III, William B ^a,b   Scott, J Michael ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AVES;

EID: 32344440437     PISSN: 00105422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1650/0010-5422(2006)108[0001:HMFAE]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. BATTIN, J., AND J. J. LAWLER. 2006. Cross-scale correlations and the design and analysis of avian habitat selection studies. Condor 108:59-70.
2. CUSHMAN, S. A., AND K. MCGARIGAL. 2002. Hierarchical, multi-scale decomposition of species-environment relationships. Landscape Ecology 17:637-646.
3. FRITZ, H., S. SAID, AND H. WEIMERSKIRCH. 2003. Scale-dependent hierarchical adjustments of movement patterns in a long-range foraging seabird. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B 270:1143-1148.
4. GOLDSTEIN, H. 2003. Multilevel statistical models. 3rd ed. Hodder Arnold, London.
5. HINSLEY, S. A. 2000. The costs of multiple patch use by birds. Landscape Ecology 15:765-775.
6. HOWELL, C. A., S. C. LATTA, T. M. DONOVAN, P. A. PORNELUZI, G. R. PARKS, AND J. FAABORG. 2000. Landscape effects mediate breeding bird abundance in midwestern forests. Landscape Ecology 15:547-562.
7. HOX, J. J. 1995. Applied multilevel analysis. TT-Publikaties, Amsterdam.
8. HUSTON, M. A. 2002. Critical issues for improving predictions, p. 7-21. In J. M. Scott, P. J. Heglund, M. L. Morrison, J. B. Haufler, M. G. Raphael, W. A. Wall, and F. B. Samson [EDS.], Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, DC.
9. JAMES, F. C. 1971. Ordinations of habitat relationships among breeding birds. Wilson Bulletin 83:215-236.
10. KING, G. 1997. A solution to the ecological inference problem. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
11. KNICK, S. T., AND J. T. ROTENBERRY. 1995. Landscape characteristics of fragmented shrubsteppe habitats and breeding passerine birds. Conservation Biology 9:1059-1071.
12. KRISTAN, W. B., III. 2006. Sources and expectations for hierarchical structure in bird-habitat associations. Condor 108:5-12.
13. LAWLER, J. J., AND T. C. EDWARDS JR. 2006. A variance-decomposition approach to investigating multiscale habitat associations. Condor 108:47-58.
14. LINK, W. A., J. R. SAUER, AND D. K. NIVEN. 2006. A hierarchical model for regional analysis of population change using Christmas Bird Count data, with application to the American Black Duck. Condor 108:13-24.
15. LUDWIG, J. A., AND D. J. TONGWAY. 1995. Spatial organisation of landscapes and its function in semi-arid woodlands, Australia. Landscape Ecology 10:51-63.
16. MAURER, B. A. 2002. Predicting distribution and abundance: thinking within and between scales, p. 125-132. In J. M. Scott, P. J. Heglund, M. L. Morrison, J. B. Haufler, M. G. Raphael, W. A. Wall, and F. B. Samson [EDS.], Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, DC.
17. MCGARIGAL, K., AND W. C. MCCOMB. 1995. Relationships between landscape structure and breeding birds in the Oregon Coast Range. Ecological Monographs 65:235-260.
18. MCINTYRE, N. E., AND J. A. WIENS. 1999. Interactions between landscape structure and animal behavior: the roles of heterogeneously distributed resources and food deprivation on movement patterns. Landscape Ecology 14:437-447.
19. O'CONNOR, R. J. 2002. The conceptual basis of species distribution modeling: time for a paradigm shift?, p. 25-33. In J. M. Scott, P. J. Heglund, M. L. Morrison, J. B. Haufler, M. G. Raphael, W. A. Wall, and F. B. Samson [EDS.], Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, DC.
20. O'NEILL, R. V., D. L. DEANGELIS, J. B. WADE, AND T. F. H. ALLEN. 1986. A hierarchical concept of ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
21. ÖSTMAN, Ö., AND A. R. IVES. 2003. Scale-dependent indirect interactions between two prey species through a shared predator. Oikos 102:505-514.
22. SCOTT, J. M., P. J. HEGLUND, M. L. MORRISON, J. B. HAUFLER, M. G. RAPHAEL, W. A. WALL, and F. B. SAMSON [EDS.]. 2002. Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, DC.
23. STAUFFER, D. F. 2002. Linking populations and habitats: where have we been? Where are we going?, p. 53-61. In J. M. Scott, P. J. Heglund, M. L. Morrison, J. B. Haufler, M. G. Raphael, W. A. Wall, and F. B. Samson [EDS.], Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, DC.
24. SVANCARA, L. K., E. O. GARTON, K. T. CHANG, J. M. SCOTT, P. ZAGER, AND M. GRATSON. 2002. The inherent aggravation of aggregation: an example with elk aerial survey data. Journal of Wildlife Management 66:776-787.
25. THOGMARTIN, W. E., M. G. KNUTSON, AND J. R. SAUER. 2006. Predicting regional abundance of rare grassland birds with a hierarchical spatial count model. Condor 108:25-46.
26. THOMAS, C. D., AND J. T. LENNON. 1999. Birds extend their ranges northwards. Nature 399:213.
27. WIENS, J. A. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional Ecology 3:385-397.
28. WIENS, J. A. 2002. Predicting species occurrences: progress, problems, and prospects, p. 739-749. In J. M. Scott, P. J. Heglund, M. L. Morrison, J. B. Haufler, M. G. Raphael, W. A. Wall, and F. B. Samson [EDS.], Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Island Press, Washington, DC.
29. WITH, K. A. 1994. Using fractal analysis to assess how species perceive landscape structure. Landscape Ecology 9:25-36.
30. WONDZELL, S. M., G. L. CUNNINGHAM, AND D. BACHELET. 1996. Relationships between landforms, geomorphic processes, and plant communities on a watershed in the northern Chihuahuan Desert. Landscape Ecology 11:351-362.