Increasing Dutch adolescents' willingness to register their organ donation preference: The effectiveness of an education programme delivered by kidney transplantation patients

European Journal of Public Health

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 106-110

  Smits, Marleen ^a   Van Den Borne, Bart ^a   Dijker, Anton J ^a   Ryckman, Richard M ^b  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MAINE   (United States)

Author keywords

(ex )patients; Adolescents; Education; Organ donation; Registration

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEATH; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EXPECTANCY; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; REGISTER; RELATIVE; SCHOOL; SCIENCE; SELF CONTROL; SELF REPORT; STUDENT;

ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE; EDUCATION; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; NETHERLANDS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUESTIONNAIRES; TISSUE AND ORGAN PROCUREMENT;

EID: 32244448747     PISSN: 11011262     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cki055     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Reubsaet A, Van den Borne B, Brug J, et al. Determinants of the intention of Dutch adolescents to register as organ donors. Soc Sci Med 2001;53:383-92.
2. Reubsaet A, Brug J, Van den Borne B, Van Hooff H. Predictors of organ donation registration among Dutch adolescents. Transplantation 2001;71:1-6.
3. Scollay PA, Doucett M, Perry M, Winterbottom B. AIDS education of college students: the effect of an HIV-positive lecturer. AIDS Educ Prev 1992;4:160-71.
4. Sunwoo J, Brenman A, Escobed J, et al. School-based AIDS education for adolescents. J Adol Health 1995;16:309-15.
5. Kline JA, Wilson WM. Ex-addicts in drug abuse prevention education. Drug Forum 1972;1:357-66.
6. Van den Thillart FELEH. The effect of different ways of education on the intention of adolescents to register themselves and to donate organs: the influence of sex and the value pattern of the respondent. Master Thesis Maastricht: Universiteit Maastricht, 2002.
7. De Jong EJC. Voor onszelf of voor elkaar? De Wet op de orgaandonatie (For ourselves or for each other? The Act on organ donation.) Zorg Verzekering 1998;6:67-77.
8. Dute JCJ, Hermans HEGM. Regulation of health care. Maarssen: Elsevier Gezondheidszorg, 2000.
9. Rosendal H, Beekum WT, Legemaate J, et al. Evaluation of the Act on Organ Donation. Den Haag: ZonMw, 2001.
10. Bandura A. Social learning theory. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 1977.
11. Ajzen I. Attitudes, personality and behavior. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 1988.
12. Birkimer JC, Barbee AP, Francis ML, et al. Effect of refutational messages, thought provocation, and decision deadlines on signing to donate organs. J Appl Soc Psychol 1994;24:1735-61.
13. Nolan BE, McGrath PJ. Social-cognitive influences on the willingness to donate organs. In: Shanteau J, Harris RJ, editors. Organ donation and transplantation: psychological and behavioural factors. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 1992:25-36.
14. Reubsaet A, Brug J, Kitslaar J, et al. The impact and evaluation of two school-based interventions on intention to register an organ donation preference. Health Educ Res, 2004;19:447-56.