The mule duck: Genetic determinism of an intergeneric hybrid;Le canard mulard: Déterminisme génétique d'un hybride intergénérique

Productions Animales

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 295-308

  Brun, J M ^a   Richard, M M ^a   Marie Etancelin, C ^a   Rouvier, R ^a   Larzul, C ^a  

^a CEMAGREF   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMALIA;

EID: 32244440895     PISSN: 09900632     EISSN: 09900632     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (119)

1. Babilé R., 1989. La production de foie gras de canards de Barbarie (Cairina moschata): aspects génétiques, nutritionnels et technologiques, Thèse de Doctorat, Institut polytechnique de Toulouse, 315p.
2. e Journ. Rech. Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Bordeaux, France, 27-28 Oct. 1998, 45-48.
3. Baéza E., 1995. La viande de canard: production et principales caractéristiques. INRA Prod. Anim., 8, 117-125.
4. Baéza E., de Carville H., Salichon M.R., Marché G., Leclercq B., 1997. Effects of selection over three and four generations on meat yield and fatness in Muscovy ducks. Br, Poult. Sci., 38, 359-365.
5. Baéza E., Salichon M.R., Marché G., Wacrenier X., Dominguez B., Culioli J., 2000, Effects of age and sex on the structural, chemical and technological characteristics of mule duck meat. Br. Poult. Sci., 41, 300-307.
6. Baéza E., Rideau N., Chartrin P., Davail S., Hoo-Paris R., Mourot J., Guy G, Bernadet M.D., Hermier D., 2005. Canards de Barbarie, Pékin et leurs croisements: aptitude à l'engraissement. INRA Prod. Anim., 18 (2), 131-141.
7. Batellier F., Marchal F., Scheller M.F., Gautron J., Sellier N., Taouis M., Monbrun C., Vignal A., Brillard J.P., 2004. Sex-ratios in mule duck embryos at various stages of incubation. Theriogenology, 61, 573-580.
8. Bebak, 1959. The histological background of fertility in an intergeneric cross. Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci., set Sci. Biol., 7, 9, 371-375.
9. e Journ. Rech. Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Bordeaux, France, 27-28 Oct. 1998, 49-52.
10. e Journ. Rech. Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Arcachon, France, 4-5 Oct. 2000, 139-142.
11. Brillard J.P.,1993. Sperm storage and transport following natural mating and artificial insemination. Poult. Sci., 72, 923-928.
12. Brody S., 1945. Bioenergetics and growth. Reinhold Publ. Corp., New York, 484-494.
13. st World Conf. Waterfowl, Taichung, Taiwan, 1-4 Dec. 1999, 193-198.
14. e Journ. Rech. Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Pau, France, 9-10 Oct. 2002, 21-24.
15. Brun J.M., Larzul C., 2003. Inheritance of reproductive traits of female common ducks (Anas platyrhynchos) in pure breeding and in inter-generic crossbreeding with Muscovy ducks (Cairina moschata). Br. Poult. Sci., 44, 1-6.
16. nd World Poult. Congr., Istanbul, Turquie, June 8-13, 2004, comm. O2.
17. Carefoot W.C., 1996. Chocolate: a sex-linked recessive plumage colour mutant of the domestic fowl. Br. Poult. Sci., 37, 867-868.
18. th Int. Symp. Waterfowl, Pise, Italie, 146.
19. Cheng Y.S., Rouvier R., Poivey J.P., Tai C., 1995. Genetic parameters of body weight, egg production and shell quality traits in the Brown Tsaiya laying ducks. Genet. Sel. Evol., 27, 459-472.
20. Cheng Y.S., Rouvier R., Poivey J.P., Tai J.J.L., Tai C., Huang S.C., 2002. Selection response for the number of fertile eggs of the Brown Tsaiya duck (Anas platyrhynchos) after a single insemination with pooled Muscovy (Cairina moschata) semen. Genet. Sel. Evol., 34, 597-611.
21. e Journ. Rech. Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Arcachon, France, 7-8 Oct. 2004, 49-52.
22. Clayton G.A., Powell J.C., 1979. Growth, food conversion, carcass yields and their heritabilities in ducks (Anas platyrhynchos). Br. Poult. Sci., 20, 121-127.
23. Denjean B., Ducos A., Darre A., Pinton A., Seguela A., Berland H., Blanc M. F., Fillon V., Darré R., 1997. Caryotypes des canards commun (Anas platyrhynchos), Barbarie (Cairina moschata) et de leur hybride. Rev. Méd. Vét., 148, 695-704.
24. Denk A.G, Gautschi B., Carter K., Kempenaers B., 2004. Seven polymorphic microsatellite loci for paternity assessment in the mallard (Anas platyrhynchos). Mol. Ecol. Notes, 4, 506-508.
25. Dickerson G, 1969. Experimental approaches in utilizing breed resources, Anim. Breed. Abstr., 37, 191-202.
26. e Journ. Rech. Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Arcachon, France, 7-8 Oct. 2004, 9-12.
27. Etches R.J., 1996. Reproduction in poultry. CAB International, 318p.
28. Faure, J.M., Val-Laillet, D., Guy, G, Bernadet, M-D., Guémené, p., 2003. Fear and stress reactions in two species of duck and their hybrid. Horm, Behav., 43, 568-572.
29. Fields R. L., Scribner K.T., 1997. Isolation and characterization of novel waterfowl microsatellite loci: cross-species comparisons and research applications, Mol, Ecol., 6, 199-202.
30. Fillon V., Vignoles M., Garrigues A., Crooijmans R.P., Groenen M.A., Séguéla A., Gellin J., Vignal A., 2001. Comparative avian cytogenetics: establishment of chromosome correspondence by fluorescent in situ hybridisation. Br. Poult. Sci., 42, 23-24.
31. Fournier E., Peresson R., Guy G., Hermier D., 1997. Relationships between storage and secretion of hepatic lipids in two breeds of geese with different susceptibility to liver steatosis, Poult. Sci., 79, 599-607.
32. Gille U., Salomon F.V., 1994. Heart and body growth in ducks. Growth Dev. Aging, 58, 75-81.
33. Gomot L., 1973. Intersexuality in birds. Study of the effects of hybridization and post-embryonic ovariectomy, special print.
34. Gomot L., Bonin 1965. L'hybridation canard pékin x cane de Barbarie. Etude comparée des canards mâles Pékin, Barbarie et hybride. Annales Scientifiques de l'Université de Besançon, 3, 19-38.
35. st World Poultry Congress, Montréal, Canada, 20-24 Août 2000.
36. Guémené D., Fournel E., Faure J.M., Guy G., 2003, Effets génotype, phénotype, âge et mode d'élevage sur les réponses comportementales et endocriniennes de canards mulards mâles. In: L'éthologie appliquée aujourd'hui, C. Baudoin (ed), Editions ED, Paris, France, 1, 65-72.
37. e Journ. Rech. Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Arcachon, France, 7-8 Oct. 2004, 81-87.
38. e Joum. Rech. Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Arcachon, France, 7-8 Oct. 2004, 99-104.
39. Guttenbach M., Nanda I., Feichtinger W., Masabanda J.S., Griffin D.K., Schmid M., 2003 Comparative chromosome painting of chicken autosomal paints 1-9 in nine different bird species, Cytogen. Genome Res, 103, 173-184.
40. e Journ. Rech. Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Arcachon, France, 7-8 Oct. 2004, 1-8.
41. Guy G., Rousselot-Pailley D., Gourichon D., 1995. Comparaison des performances de l'oie, du canard mulard et du canard de Barbarie soumis au gavage, Ann. Zootech., 44, 297-305.
42. Guy G., Rousselot-Pailley D., Rouvier R., 1998. Description de la croissance de canettes mulardes. Ann. Zootech., 45, 303-310.
43. st World Waterfowl Conference, Taichung, Taiwan, 1-4 Dec. 1999, 462-468.
44. e Journ. Rech. Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Pau, France, 9-10 Oct. 2002, 37-40.
45. Gvaryahu G., Robinzon B., Meltzer A., Perek M., Snapir N., 1984. Artificial insemination and natural mating in the crossbreeding of the Muscovy drake and the Pekin duck. Poult. Sci., 63, 386-387.
46. Haldane J.E.S., 1922. Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. J. Genet., 12, 101-109.
47. Hermier D., Saadoun A., Salichon M.R., Sellier N., Rousselot-Pailley D., Chapman M.J. 1991, Plasma lipoproteins and liver lipids in two breeds of geese with different susceptibility to hepatic steatosis; changes induced by development and force-feeding. Lipids, 26, 331-339.
48. Hermier D., Guy G., Guillaumin S., Davail S., André J.M., Hoo-Paris R. 2003. Differential channelling of liver lipids in relation to susceptibility to hepatic steatosis in two species of ducks. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B, Biochem. Mol. Biol., 135, 663-675.
49. Hetzel D.J.S., 1983. The egg production of intensively managed Alabio and Tegal ducks and their reciprocal crosses, World Rev. Anim. Prod., 19, 4.
50. Hetzel D.J.S., 1984. Comparative performance of intensively managed Khaki Campbell and Native Indonesian ducks. Trop. Anim. Health Prod., 16, 39-85.
51. Hollander W.F., 1970. Sex-linked chocolate coloration in the Muscovy duck. Poult. Sci., 49, 594-596.
52. th Int. Symp. Waterfowl, Pise, Italie, 64-66.
53. Hu YH., 1999. Variabilité génétique des performances de croissance et de ponte dans une lignée de canards de Barbarie sélectionnée à Taïwan; Viabilité embryonnaire précoce dans le croisement intergénérique des canards. Thèse de doctorat, Institut National Polytechnique, Toulouse, 125p.
54. Hu Y.H., Poivey J.P., Rouvier R., Wang C.T., Tai C. 1999. Heritabilities and genetic correlations of body weights and feather length in growing Muscovy selected in Taiwan. Br. Poult. Sci., 40, 605-612.
55. Huang H.H., 1985. Selection of white mule ducks. J. Chin. Soc. Anim. Sci., 14, 111-122.
56. Huang H.H., Chow T.C., 1974. Artificial insemination in mule duck production. Proc. XV World. Poult. Congr., New Orleans, USA, 261-262.
57. Huang M.C., Sung Y.Y., 1988. Cytogenetical analysis of the germ cell in the domestic drake and mule drake. Proc. Natl. Sci. Counc, B. ROC, 12 (4), 202-208.
58. nd World Poult Congr., Istanbul, Turquie, June 8-13 2004, Comm. O2.
59. Huang Y., Tu J., Cheng X., Tang B., Hu X., Liu Z., Feng J., Lou Y, Lin L., Zhao Y., Li N., 2005. Characterization of 35 novel microsatellite DNA markers from the duck (Anas platyrhynchos) genome and cross-amplification in other birds. Genet Sel. Evol., 37, 455-472.
60. Imbert B., 2002. Comparaison génétique des caractéristiques biochimiques du magret de canard. Diplôme de Recherche Universitaire de l'Institut National Polytechnique de Toulouse, 63p.
61. th Eur. Symp. Waterfowl, Halle, Allemagne, 26-31 mars 1995, 433-438.
62. Klemm R., Reiter K., Pingel H., 1994. Results and effects of direct selection for feed efficiency in the domestic ducks: 2. Report: Methodical aspects. Arch. Geflügelk., 58, 176-181.
63. Knizetova H., Hyanek J., Knize B., Prochatzova H., 1991. Analysis of growth curve of fowl. II. Ducks. Br. Poult Sci., 22, 1027-1038.
64. Knizetova H., Hyanek J., Hyankova L., Belicek P., 1995. Comparative study of growth curves in poultry. Genet Sel. Evol., 27, 365-375.
65. Lake P.E., 1975. Gamete production and the fertile period with particular reference to domesticated birds. Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond., 35, 225-244.
66. Larzul C., 2002a. Genetic parameters for overfed mule duck traits. 7th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest Prod., Montpellier, France, August 19-23 2002, Comm. 04-08.
67. e Journ. Rech. Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Pau, France, 9-10 Oct 2002, 33-36.
68. st World Conf. Waterfowl, Taichung, Taiwan, 1-4 Dec. 1999, 122-126.
69. Laizul C., Rouvier R., Rousselot-Pailley D., Guy G, 2000. Estimation of genetic parameters in a white plumage "polish" geese strain for growth and carcass traits in non overfed animals, and for growth and overfeeding traits in overfed animals. Genet Sel. Evol., 32, 415-427.
70. e Journ. Rech. Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Pau, France, 9-10 Oct. 2002, 29-32.
71. Larzul C., Guy G, Bernadet M.D., 2004. Feed efficiency, growth and carcass traits in female mule ducks. Arch. Gefügelk., 6, 265-268.
72. Lee S.R., Kang C.L., 1997. Improving the percentage of white plumage in Mule ducks. J. Taiwan Livest. Res., 30, 293-299.
73. Leclercq B., 1990. Croissance et composition corporelle du Canard de Barbarie. In: B. Sauveur et H. de Carville (eds), Le Canard de Barbarie, INRA, Paris, 23-39.
74. Lutz-Ostertag Y., 1965. Le croisement canard Khaki-Campbell x Cane Barbarie. Arch. Anat. Hist. Embryol., 48, 300-327.
75. Maak S., Wimmers K., Weigend S., Neumann K., 2003. Isolation and characterization of 18 microsatellites in the Peking duck (Anasplatyrhynchos) and their application in other waterfowl species. Mol. Ecol. Notes, 3, 224-227.
76. Marchand C.R., Gomot L., 1972. Variations annuelles de l'activité testiculaire du canard hybride issu du croisement Pékin male (Anas p) x Femelle Barbarie (Cairina m). C.R. séances Soc. Biol., 166, 556-561.
77. Maruyama K., Akbar M.K., Turk C.M., 1999. Growth patterns and carcass development in male ducks selected for growth rate. Br. Poult Sci., 40, 233-239.
78. Mialon M.M., 1985. Croisement entre 3 souches de Barbarie et de canes communes: performances de reproduction, de gavage des mulards obtenus. Mémoire de fin d'études, ENITA Bordeaux, 53p.
79. Mignon-Grasteau S., Beaumont C., Poivey J.P., Rochambeau H. de., 1998. Estimation of the genetic parameters of sexual dimorphism of body weight in "label" chickens and Muscovy ducks. Genet Sel. Evol., 30, 481-491.
80. e Conf. Eur. Aviculture, Paris, France, 1, 99-103.
81. Migliore L., Romboli I., Fedeli-Avanzi C., 1988. Génétique du plumage du canard de Barbarie (Cairina Moschata). Une mise au point. Les Colloques de l'INRA, 42, 29-38.
82. Mort C.L., Lockhart L.H., Rigdon R.H., 1968. Chromosomes of the sterile hybrid duck. Cytogenetics, 7, 403-412.
83. Mourot J., Guy G, Lagarrigue S., Peiniau P., Hermier D., 2000. Role of hepatic lipogenesis in the susceptibility to fatty liver in the goose (Aaser anser). Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B Comp. Biochem., 126, 81-87.
84. Olver M.D., Preez J.J., Kuyper M.A., Mould DJ., 1977. The carcass composition and growth of the "mule" ducklings compared to purebred ducklings. Agroanimalia, 9, 7-12.
85. Onishi N. et al., 1955. Studies on the artificial inseminations of ducks. Bull. Nat. Inst Agric. Sci., 11, 1-16.
86. e Journ. Rech. Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Arcachon, Fiance, 7-8 Oct. 2004, 19-22.
87. th Int Symp. Waterfowl, Budapest, Hongrie, 48-50.
88. Pingel H., 1990a. Genetics of egg production and reproduction in waterfowl. In: Poultry breeding and genetics, R.D. Crawford Ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 771-780.
89. Pingel H., 1990b. Genetics of growth and meat production in waterfowl In: Poultry breeding and genetics, R.D. Crawford Ed., Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 691-704.
90. Poivey JP, Cheng YS, Rouvier R., Tai C., Wang CT, Liu HL, 2001. Genetic parameters of reproductive traits in Brown Tsaiya ducks artificially inseminated with semen from Muscovy ducks. Poult Sci., 80, 703-709.
91. Poujardieu B., Guichard F., Laventure P., 1994. Paramètres génétiques de croissance et de gavage de la cane commune. Genet Sel. Evol., 26, 463-472.
92. th World Poultry Cong., Helsinki, Finlande, 108-109.
93. Ramirez D.A., Arboleda C.R., Escote L.J., Ticohermonso E., 1976. The cytogenetics of intergeneric hybrids of Anas hochas and Cairina moschata. Phillipine Agriculturalist, 60, 6.
94. st World Conf. Waterfowl, Taichung, Taiwan, 1-4 Dec. 1999, 597-602.
95. Ricard F.H., de Carville H., Marché G., 1988. Etude comparative de la composition anatomique des canards de Barbarie, Pékin et mulard. In: La génétique du canard de Barbarie (Cairina moschata) et du mulard, R. Rouvier (ed.), Les colloques de l'INRA, 42, 75-99.
96. e Journ. Rech. Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Pau, France, 9-10 Oct 2002, 41-45.
97. emes Journ. Rech. Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Arcachon, France, 7-8 Oct. 2004, 157-165.
98. Rouvier R., Tai J.J.L., Tai C., 1984. L'insémination artificielle des canes communes pour la production de mulards i Taiwan. La situation actuelle. In: Insémination artificielles et amélioration génétique: bilan et perspectives critiques. Les colloques de l'INRA, 29, 360-367.
99. Rouvier R., Mialon M.M., Salzmann F., Poujardieu B., 1988. Fertilité et éclosabilité des œufs d'une souche de cane Pékin (Anas platyrhynchos) en croisement interspécifique avec le Barbarie (Cairina moschata) par insémination artificielle. Ann. Zootech., 37, 73-86.
100. Rouvier R., Guy G., Rousselot-Paillet D., Poujardieu B., 1994. Genetic parameters from factorial cross breeding in two duck strain (Anas platyrhynchos) brown Tsaiya and Pékin, for growth and fatty liver traits. Br. Poultry Sci., 35, 509-517.
101. ère Journ. Rech. Palmipèdes à Foie Gras, Bordeaux, France, 28-29 Avril 1993, 13-21.
102. Sauveur B., 1988. Reproduction des volailles et production d'oeufs. Editions INRA, Paris, France, 449p.
103. Sellier N., Brun J.M., Richard M.M., Batellier F., Dupuy V., Brillard J.P., 2005. Comparison of fertility and embryo mortality following artificial insemination of common duck females (Anas platyrhynchos) with semen from common or Muscovy (Cairina moschata) drakes. Theriogenology, 64, 429-439.
104. Setiawan I, Babilé R, Auvergne A, et al. 1994. Growth and carcass composition of 2 genetic types in mule ducklings. Ann. Zootech., 43, 185-196.
105. Shetty S., Griffin D.K., Graves J.A.M. 1999, Comparative painting reveals strong chromosome homology over 80 million years of bird evolution. Chrom. Res., 7, 289-295.
106. Snapir N., Rulf J., Meltzer A., Gvaryahu G., Rozenboim I., Robinzon B., 1998. Testosterone concentrations, testes weight and morphology of mule drakes (Muscovy drake x Khaki Campbell). Br. Poultry Sci., 39, 572-574.
107. Stai S. M., Hughes C. R. 2003, Characterization of microsatellite loci in wild and domestic Muscovy ducks (Cairina moschata), Anim. Genet., 34, 387-389.
108. Steele M.G, Wishart G.J., 1992, Evidence for a species-specific barrier to sperm transport within the vagina of the chicken hen. Theriogenology, 38, 1107-1114.
109. Tai C., Rouvier R., 1998, Crossbreeding effect on sexual dimorphism of body weight in intergeneric hybrids obtained between Muscovy and Pekin duck. Genet. Sel. Evol., 30, 163-170.
110. Tai Liu J.J., Tai C., 1984. Studies on the artificial insemination of ducks. 3. A comparison of fertility of pooled semen and individual male semen in the crosses between Muscovy (Cairina moschata) and Tsaiya duck (Anas platyrhynchos var domestica). J. Taiwan Livest. Res., 17, 85-89.
111. Tai Liu J.J., Tai C., 1991. Mule duck production in Taiwan. I. Artificial insemination of ducks. Food and Fertilizer Technology Center, extension Bulletin, 328, 1-6.
112. Tai C., Poivey J.P., Rouvier R., 1994. Heritability for duration of fertility traits in Brown Tsaiya female ducks (Anas platyrhynchos) by artifical insemination with pooled Muscovy (Cairina moschata) semen. Br. Poult. Sci., 37, 571-577.
113. Takahashi H., Satoh M., Minezawa M., Purwadaria T., Prasetyo H., 2001. Characteriza-tion of duck microsatellite repeat sequences. Jap. Agric. Res. Quart., 35, 217-219.
114. Tchelycheva L.A., Delpech P., Popescu C.P., Rodionov A.V., 1993. Arrêt de la condensation chromosomique chez l'hybride interspé cifique entre cane commune et canard de Barbarie, le mulard. Ann. Génét, 36, 190-193.
115. Tesoro, M., Migliore, L., Romboli, I., 1986. The karyotype of a duck hybrid: Anas platyrhyn-chos x Cairina moschata. Ann. Fac. Med.Vet.di Pisa, 39, 153-158.
116. Velez A., Brun J.M., Rouvier R., 1996. Crossbreeding effects on reproductive traits in two strains of duck (Anas platyrhynchos): Brown Tsaiya and Pekin. Br. Poult. Sci., 37, 571-577.
117. Vinoo, R.; Thangaraju, P.; Nainar, A. M. 1999. Karyological studies on domestic fowl, Japanese quail and domestic duck using embryo culture technique. Ind. J. Poultry Sci., 34, 135-139.
118. Watanabe M., 1959. Partial infertility of intergeneric hybrid eggs between the Muscovy Drake and the Common duck. J. Fac. Fish. Anim. Husb., Hiroshima Univ., 2, 330-373.
119. Watanabe M., 1961. Experimental studies on the artificial insemination of domestic ducks, with special references to the production of the mule ducks. J. Fac. Fish Anim. Husb., Hiroshima Univ., 3, 439-485.